Paper · 1992 · Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Seasonal patterns of biomass accumulation and carbon allocation in Pinustaeda seedlings exposed to ozone, acidic precipitation, and reduced soil Mg

G.S. Edwards; A.L. Friend; E.G. O'Neill; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
31
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Seasonal patterns of biomass accumulation and carbon allocation were determined for 1-year-old loblolly pine (Pinustaeda L.) seedlings grown in soil having either 15 or 35 μg Mg•g −1 and exposed to subambient, ambient, or twice ambient levels of ozone (O 3 ) and simulated rainfall at pH 3.8 or 5.2 in open-top chambers. Seedlings were harvested during the 1988 dormancy period, immediately prior to bud break in 1989, during the first and third foliar growth flushes of 1989, and at the end of the 1989 growing season. At each harvest, biomass of individual seedling components was determined for all seedlings, and 14 C allocation among components was determined on a subset of seedlings. Seedlings exposed to twice ambient O 3 exhibited a delay in fine-root production at the beginning of the 1989 growing season and reduced coarse-root biomass at the end of the 1989 growing season. Acidic precipitation and soil Mg treatments did not significantly affect biomass at any harvest date, nor were any treatment interactions observed. Biomass accumulation and carbon allocation were strongly affected by plant phenological stage, with maximum root allocation immediately prior to bud break and maximum shoot allocation at the end of the growing season. Seedlings exposed to twice ambient levels of O 3 exhibited increased total respirational losses, decreased foliar retention, and slightly reduced export of initial 14 C label to stem and roots compared with seedlings exposed to subambient O 3 ; however, these trends were not statistically significant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice ambient ozone delayed fine-root production early in the 1989 growing season.

Taxon
loblolly pinePinus taedae1
Organ / stage
fine-roote0
Treatment
twice ambient O 3e0
Outcome
fine-root productione0
Direction
delaye0
Comparator
ambiente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus taeda
Pinus taeda · TaxonWoodlot · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings exposed to twice ambient O 3 exhibited a delay in fine-root production at the beginning of the 1989 growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–815 · show in text ↑
e1

“loblolly pine (Pinustaeda L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice ambient ozone reduced coarse-root biomass at the end of the 1989 growing season.

Taxon
loblolly pinePinus taedae1
Treatment
twice ambient O 3e0
Outcome
coarse-root biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
ambiente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus taeda
Pinus taeda · TaxonWoodlot · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings exposed to twice ambient O 3 exhibited a delay in fine-root production at the beginning of the 1989 growing season and reduced coarse-root biomass at the end of the 1989 growing season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–886 · show in text ↑
e1

“loblolly pine (Pinustaeda L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Acidic precipitation did not significantly affect seedling biomass at any harvest.

Taxon
loblolly pinePinus taedae1
Treatment
Acidic precipitatione0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0
Comparator
soil Mg treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus taeda
Pinus taeda · TaxonWoodlot · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acidic precipitation and soil Mg treatments did not significantly affect biomass at any harvest date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–987 · show in text ↑
e1

“loblolly pine (Pinustaeda L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil Mg treatment did not significantly affect biomass at any harvest.

Taxon
loblolly pinePinus taedae1
Treatment
soil Mg treatmentse0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0
Comparator
Acidic precipitatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus taeda
Pinus taeda · TaxonWoodlot · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acidic precipitation and soil Mg treatments did not significantly affect biomass at any harvest date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–987 · show in text ↑
e1

“loblolly pine (Pinustaeda L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No treatment interactions were observed for biomass.

Taxon
loblolly pinePinus taedae1
Outcome
treatment interactionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus taeda
Pinus taeda · TaxonWoodlot · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nor were any treatment interactions observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1034 · show in text ↑
e1

“loblolly pine (Pinustaeda L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root carbon allocation was maximal immediately before bud break.

Taxon
loblolly pinePinus taedae1
Organ / stage
bud breake0
Outcome
root allocatione0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus taeda
Pinus taeda · TaxonWoodlot · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum root allocation immediately prior to bud break”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1189 · show in text ↑
e1

“loblolly pine (Pinustaeda L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot carbon allocation was maximal at the end of the growing season.

Taxon
loblolly pinePinus taedae1
Outcome
shoot allocatione0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus taeda
Pinus taeda · TaxonWoodlot · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum shoot allocation at the end of the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1251 · show in text ↑
e1

“loblolly pine (Pinustaeda L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice ambient ozone increased respirational losses relative to subambient ozone, without statistical significance.

Taxon
loblolly pinePinus taedae1
Treatment
twice ambient levels of O 3e0
Outcome
total respirational lossese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
subambient O 3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus taeda
Pinus taeda · TaxonWoodlot · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings exposed to twice ambient levels of O 3 exhibited increased total respirational losses, decreased foliar retention, and slightly reduced export of initial 14 C label to stem and roots compared with seedlings exposed to subambient O 3 ; however, these trends were not statistically significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1555 · show in text ↑
e1

“loblolly pine (Pinustaeda L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice ambient ozone decreased foliar carbon retention relative to subambient ozone, without statistical significance.

Taxon
loblolly pinePinus taedae1
Treatment
twice ambient levels of O 3e0
Outcome
foliar retentione0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
subambient O 3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus taeda
Pinus taeda · TaxonWoodlot · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings exposed to twice ambient levels of O 3 exhibited increased total respirational losses, decreased foliar retention, and slightly reduced export of initial 14 C label to stem and roots compared with seedlings exposed to subambient O 3 ; however, these trends were not statistically significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1555 · show in text ↑
e1

“loblolly pine (Pinustaeda L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice ambient ozone slightly reduced initial 14C export to stem and roots relative to subambient ozone, without statistical significance.

Taxon
loblolly pinePinus taedae1
Treatment
twice ambient levels of O 3e0
Outcome
export of initial 14 C label to stem and rootse0
Direction
slightly reducede0
Comparator
subambient O 3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus taeda
Pinus taeda · TaxonWoodlot · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings exposed to twice ambient levels of O 3 exhibited increased total respirational losses, decreased foliar retention, and slightly reduced export of initial 14 C label to stem and roots compared with seedlings exposed to subambient O 3 ; however, these trends were not statistically significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1555 · show in text ↑
e1

“loblolly pine (Pinustaeda L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–124 · show in text ↑

magnesium atom · growth · Pinus taeda (loblolly pine)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

ozone · growth · Pinus taeda (loblolly pine)Results differ

14 papers: 0 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

rainfall · growth · Pinus taeda (loblolly pine)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

ozone · molecular: metabolites · Pinus taeda (loblolly pine)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

ozone · yield · Pinus taeda (loblolly pine)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.