Paper · 2006 · Moor Journal of Agricultural Research

Effects of fertilizer types and different companion crops on the performance of sweet potato

B Osundare

16
claims
16
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in 2002 and 2003 cropping seasons, at the University of Ibadan Teaching and Research Farm to evaluate the effects of fertilizer types and different companion crops on the performance of sweet potato. The results obtained showed that the growth and yield of sweet potato were significantly influenced by fertilizer types and different companion crops. The significant percentage increases in sweet potato leaf area under fertilizer types were 182, 216 and 336% by inorganic, organic and inorganic +organic fertilizers, respectively. The significant percentage decreases in sweet potato leaf area under different companion crops were 23, 35 and 49% by sweet potato /maize, sweet potato/ cassava and sweet potato/cassava/cocoyam, respectively. The significant percentage increases in the length of sweet potato root tuber under fertilizer types were 15, 25 and 39% by inorganic, organic and inorganic+organic fertilizers, respectively. The significant percentage decreases in the length of sweet potato root tuber under different companion crops were 13 and 23% by sweet potato/ cassava and sweet potato/cassava /cocoyam, respectively. The significant percentage increases in sweet potato root tuber yield under fertilizer types were 27, 47 and 97% by inorganic, organic and inorganic + organic fertilizers, respectively. The significant percentage decreases in root tuber yield of sweet potato under companion crops were 9 and 19% by sweet potato/cassava and sweet potato/cassava/cocoyam, respectively. Keywords: cassava, cocoyam, fertilizer types, inorganic, organic fertilizer, maize Moor Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 5(2) 2004: 88-94

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic fertilizer increased sweet potato leaf area by 182%.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
inorganice0
Outcome
sweet potato leaf areae0
Direction
increasese0
Value
182e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percentage increases in sweet potato leaf area under fertilizer types were 182, 216 and 336% by inorganic, organic and inorganic +organic fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–549 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer increased sweet potato leaf area by 216%.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
organice0
Outcome
sweet potato leaf areae0
Direction
increasese0
Value
216e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percentage increases in sweet potato leaf area under fertilizer types were 182, 216 and 336% by inorganic, organic and inorganic +organic fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–549 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inorganic and organic fertilizer increased sweet potato leaf area by 336%.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
inorganic +organic fertilizerse0
Outcome
sweet potato leaf areae0
Direction
increasese0
Value
336%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percentage increases in sweet potato leaf area under fertilizer types were 182, 216 and 336% by inorganic, organic and inorganic +organic fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–549 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet potato with maize had 23% less leaf area.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
sweet potato /maizee0
Interactor
maizeZea mayse0weed
Outcome
sweet potato leaf areae0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
23e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · InteractorAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percentage decreases in sweet potato leaf area under different companion crops were 23, 35 and 49% by sweet potato /maize, sweet potato/ cassava and sweet potato/cassava/cocoyam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–758 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet potato with cassava had 35% less leaf area.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
sweet potato/ cassavae0
Interactor
cassavaManihot esculentae0weed
Outcome
sweet potato leaf areae0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
35e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Interactor葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percentage decreases in sweet potato leaf area under different companion crops were 23, 35 and 49% by sweet potato /maize, sweet potato/ cassava and sweet potato/cassava/cocoyam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–758 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet potato with cassava and cocoyam had 49% less leaf area.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
sweet potato/cassava/cocoyame0
Interactor
cassavaManihot esculentae0weed
Second interactor
cocoyamColocasia esculentae0weed
Outcome
sweet potato leaf areae0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
49%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Interactor葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · Second interactorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percentage decreases in sweet potato leaf area under different companion crops were 23, 35 and 49% by sweet potato /maize, sweet potato/ cassava and sweet potato/cassava/cocoyam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–758 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic fertilizer increased sweet potato tuber length by 15%.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
inorganice0
Outcome
length of sweet potato root tubere0
Direction
increasese0
Value
15e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percentage increases in the length of sweet potato root tuber under fertilizer types were 15, 25 and 39% by inorganic, organic and inorganic+organic fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–950 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer increased sweet potato tuber length by 25%.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
organice0
Outcome
length of sweet potato root tubere0
Direction
increasese0
Value
25e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percentage increases in the length of sweet potato root tuber under fertilizer types were 15, 25 and 39% by inorganic, organic and inorganic+organic fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–950 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertilizer increased sweet potato tuber length by 39%.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
inorganic+organic fertilizerse0
Outcome
length of sweet potato root tubere0
Direction
increasese0
Value
39%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percentage increases in the length of sweet potato root tuber under fertilizer types were 15, 25 and 39% by inorganic, organic and inorganic+organic fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–950 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cassava companion cropping decreased sweet potato tuber length by 13%.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
sweet potato/ cassavae0
Interactor
cassavaManihot esculentae0weed
Outcome
length of sweet potato root tubere0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
13e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Interactor葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percentage decreases in the length of sweet potato root tuber under different companion crops were 13 and 23% by sweet potato/ cassava and sweet potato/cassava /cocoyam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cassava and cocoyam companion cropping decreased sweet potato tuber length by 23%.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
sweet potato/cassava /cocoyame0
Interactor
cassavaManihot esculentae0weed
Second interactor
cocoyamColocasia esculentae0weed
Outcome
length of sweet potato root tubere0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
23%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Interactor葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · Second interactorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percentage decreases in the length of sweet potato root tuber under different companion crops were 13 and 23% by sweet potato/ cassava and sweet potato/cassava /cocoyam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic fertilizer increased sweet potato tuber yield by 27%.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
inorganice0
Outcome
sweet potato root tuber yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
27e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percentage increases in sweet potato root tuber yield under fertilizer types were 27, 47 and 97% by inorganic, organic and inorganic + organic fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer increased sweet potato tuber yield by 47%.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
organice0
Outcome
sweet potato root tuber yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
47e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percentage increases in sweet potato root tuber yield under fertilizer types were 27, 47 and 97% by inorganic, organic and inorganic + organic fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertilizer increased sweet potato tuber yield by 97%.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
inorganic + organic fertilizerse0
Outcome
sweet potato root tuber yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
97%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percentage increases in sweet potato root tuber yield under fertilizer types were 27, 47 and 97% by inorganic, organic and inorganic + organic fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cassava companion cropping decreased sweet potato tuber yield by 9%.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
sweet potato/cassavae0
Interactor
cassavaManihot esculentae0weed
Outcome
root tuber yield of sweet potatoe0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
9e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Interactor葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percentage decreases in root tuber yield of sweet potato under companion crops were 9 and 19% by sweet potato/cassava and sweet potato/cassava/cocoyam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1518 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cassava and cocoyam companion cropping decreased sweet potato tuber yield by 19%.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
sweet potato/cassava/cocoyame0
Interactor
cassavaManihot esculentae0weed
Second interactor
cocoyamColocasia esculentae0weed
Outcome
root tuber yield of sweet potatoe0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
19%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Interactor葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · Second interactorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percentage decreases in root tuber yield of sweet potato under companion crops were 9 and 19% by sweet potato/cassava and sweet potato/cassava/cocoyam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1518 · show in text ↑

Zea mays · growth · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · growth · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results differ

63 papers: 53 positive, 10 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

cultivation system · growth · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · organism · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 126 positive, 19 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.