Paper · 2010 · South African Journal of Botany

Age and orientation of the cotyledonary leaf explants determine the efficiency of de novo plant regeneration and Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation in Jatropha curcas L.

P. Mazumdar; A. Basu; A. Paul; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
68
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Effects of age and orientation of the explant on callus induction and de novo shoot regeneration from cotyledonary leaf segments of Jatropha curcas were studied. The callus induction and shoot regeneration capacity of cotyledonary leaf segments were found significantly related to the age of the explants and their orientation in culture medium. The youngest explant, derived from the cotyledonary leaf of germinated seed induced the highest regeneration response as compared to one- and two-week-old explants. A gradient response with age of the explant was observed in percentage of callus induction, shoot regeneration from callus and the number of shoots per regenerating callus. The explants cultured with their abaxial side in medium showed significantly higher regeneration response. The youngest explant was found to be most amenable to Agrobacterium-mediated transformation as compared to older explants. The fact that callus induced from the edges of the explant followed by de novo shoot induction, and strong transient gus expression observed in the edges of the explant are significant for routine Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and generation of stable transgenic plants in J. curcas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Callus induction and shoot regeneration capacity were significantly related to explant age and orientation.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Organ / stage
cotyledonary leaf segmentse0
Treatment
age of the explants and their orientation in culture mediume0
Outcome
callus induction and shoot regeneration capacitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The callus induction and shoot regeneration capacity of cotyledonary leaf segments were found significantly related to the age of the explants and their orientation in culture medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–345 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 166–184 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The youngest explants had the highest regeneration response compared with one- and two-week-old explants.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Organ / stage
cotyledonary leafe0
Treatment
The youngest explante0
Outcome
regeneration responsee0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
one- and two-week-old explantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The youngest explant, derived from the cotyledonary leaf of germinated seed induced the highest regeneration response as compared to one- and two-week-old explants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–510 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 166–184 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Callus induction percentage varied with explant age.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Organ / stage
explante0
Outcome
percentage of callus inductione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A gradient response with age of the explant was observed in percentage of callus induction, shoot regeneration from callus and the number of shoots per regenerating callus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 166–184 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot regeneration from callus varied with explant age.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Organ / stage
explante0
Outcome
shoot regeneration from calluse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A gradient response with age of the explant was observed in percentage of callus induction, shoot regeneration from callus and the number of shoots per regenerating callus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 166–184 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoots per regenerating callus varied with explant age.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Organ / stage
explante0
Outcome
number of shoots per regenerating calluse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A gradient response with age of the explant was observed in percentage of callus induction, shoot regeneration from callus and the number of shoots per regenerating callus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 166–184 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Abaxial-side-down explants had significantly higher regeneration response.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Treatment
abaxial side in mediume0
Outcome
regeneration responsee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The explants cultured with their abaxial side in medium showed significantly higher regeneration response.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 166–184 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The youngest explants were most amenable to Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Treatment
The youngest explante0
Interactor
AgrobacteriumAgrobacteriume0other
Outcome
Agrobacterium-mediated transformatione0
Direction
most amenablee0
Comparator
older explantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrobacterium
Agrobacterium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDidierFy · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The youngest explant was found to be most amenable to Agrobacterium-mediated transformation as compared to older explants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 166–184 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Callus formed at explant edges and was followed by de novo shoot induction.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Organ / stage
explante0
Outcome
callus induced from the edges of the explant followed by de novo shoot inductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“callus induced from the edges of the explant followed by de novo shoot induction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 166–184 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strong transient gus expression was seen at explant edges.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Organ / stage
explante0
Gene
guse0
Outcome
transient gus expressione0
Direction
stronge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strong transient gus expression observed in the edges of the explant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1082 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 166–184 · show in text ↑

in vitro · growth · Jatropha curcasPositive and negative results

27 papers: 25 positive, 2 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.