Paper · 1994 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

A glasshouse evaluation of sulfur fertilizer sources for crops and pastures. II. A comparison of sulfur coated triple superphosphates and gypsum

GJ Blair; M Dana; R Lefroy

8
claims
23
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In many parts of the world it has become more economical to use triple superphosphate (TSP) rather than single superphosphate (SSP) as a pasture fertilizer where only P deficiency exists. Coating TSP with elemental S is an attractive alternative to SSP for situations where P and S deficiency exists. A pot experiment was conducted on an S deficient Aquic Haplustalf soil to compare the ability of gypsum (G) and S coated TSP to supply S to a ryegrass/white clover pasture over 14 repeated harvests over a 96 week period. The adhesives used to coat S to TSP were UNE1, UNE3, UNE2 and a commercial product (HF). The reverse dilution 35S technique was used to calculate fertilizer S uptake. Total yields were highest with G and UNE1. Total fertilizer S recovery by the pasture was 64.4% for G and 52.3% and 52.9% for UNEl and UNE3 respectively. These amounts were significantly higher than from UNE2 or HF. The time course of fertilizer S release varied between products and shows that bonding method can affect S availability from S coated TSP products.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total pasture yields were highest with gypsum.

Taxon
ryegrass/white cloverTrifolium repensLoliume0
Treatment
gypsume0
Outcome
Total yieldse1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A pot experiment was conducted on an S deficient Aquic Haplustalf soil to compare the ability of gypsum (G) and S coated TSP to supply S to a ryegrass/white clover pasture over 14 repeated harvests over a 96 week period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–520 · show in text ↑
e1

“Total yields were highest with G and UNE1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–730 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total pasture yields were highest with the UNE1 S-coated TSP.

Taxon
ryegrass/white cloverTrifolium repensLoliume0
Treatment
UNE1e1
Outcome
Total yieldse1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A pot experiment was conducted on an S deficient Aquic Haplustalf soil to compare the ability of gypsum (G) and S coated TSP to supply S to a ryegrass/white clover pasture over 14 repeated harvests over a 96 week period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–520 · show in text ↑
e1

“Total yields were highest with G and UNE1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–730 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total fertilizer S recovery by the pasture was 64.4% for gypsum.

Taxon
ryegrass/white cloverTrifolium repensLoliume0
Treatment
Ge2
Outcome
Total fertilizer S recoverye2
Value
64.4%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A pot experiment was conducted on an S deficient Aquic Haplustalf soil to compare the ability of gypsum (G) and S coated TSP to supply S to a ryegrass/white clover pasture over 14 repeated harvests over a 96 week period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–520 · show in text ↑
e2

“Total fertilizer S recovery by the pasture was 64.4% for G”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–790 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total fertilizer S recovery by the pasture was 52.3% for UNE1.

Taxon
ryegrass/white cloverTrifolium repensLoliume0
Treatment
UNEle3
Outcome
Total fertilizer S recoverye2
Value
52.3%e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A pot experiment was conducted on an S deficient Aquic Haplustalf soil to compare the ability of gypsum (G) and S coated TSP to supply S to a ryegrass/white clover pasture over 14 repeated harvests over a 96 week period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–520 · show in text ↑
e2

“Total fertilizer S recovery by the pasture was 64.4% for G”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–790 · show in text ↑
e3

“52.3% and 52.9% for UNEl and UNE3 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–841 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total fertilizer S recovery by the pasture was 52.9% for UNE3.

Taxon
ryegrass/white cloverTrifolium repensLoliume0
Treatment
UNE3e3
Outcome
Total fertilizer S recoverye2
Value
52.9%e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A pot experiment was conducted on an S deficient Aquic Haplustalf soil to compare the ability of gypsum (G) and S coated TSP to supply S to a ryegrass/white clover pasture over 14 repeated harvests over a 96 week period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–520 · show in text ↑
e2

“Total fertilizer S recovery by the pasture was 64.4% for G”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–790 · show in text ↑
e3

“52.3% and 52.9% for UNEl and UNE3 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

S recovery from UNEl was significantly higher than from UNE2 or HF.

Taxon
ryegrass/white cloverTrifolium repensLoliume0
Treatment
UNEle3
Outcome
Total fertilizer S recoverye2
Direction
highere4
Comparator
UNE2 or HFe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A pot experiment was conducted on an S deficient Aquic Haplustalf soil to compare the ability of gypsum (G) and S coated TSP to supply S to a ryegrass/white clover pasture over 14 repeated harvests over a 96 week period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–520 · show in text ↑
e2

“Total fertilizer S recovery by the pasture was 64.4% for G”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–790 · show in text ↑
e3

“52.3% and 52.9% for UNEl and UNE3 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–841 · show in text ↑
e4

“These amounts were significantly higher than from UNE2 or HF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–903 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

S recovery from UNE3 was significantly higher than from UNE2 or HF.

Taxon
ryegrass/white cloverTrifolium repensLoliume0
Treatment
UNE3e3
Outcome
Total fertilizer S recoverye2
Direction
highere4
Comparator
UNE2 or HFe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A pot experiment was conducted on an S deficient Aquic Haplustalf soil to compare the ability of gypsum (G) and S coated TSP to supply S to a ryegrass/white clover pasture over 14 repeated harvests over a 96 week period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–520 · show in text ↑
e2

“Total fertilizer S recovery by the pasture was 64.4% for G”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–790 · show in text ↑
e3

“52.3% and 52.9% for UNEl and UNE3 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–841 · show in text ↑
e4

“These amounts were significantly higher than from UNE2 or HF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–903 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bonding method can affect S availability from S-coated TSP products, as the time course of fertilizer S release varied between products.

Taxon
ryegrass/white cloverTrifolium repensLoliume0
Treatment
bonding methode6
Outcome
fertilizer S releasee5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lolium
Lolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A pot experiment was conducted on an S deficient Aquic Haplustalf soil to compare the ability of gypsum (G) and S coated TSP to supply S to a ryegrass/white clover pasture over 14 repeated harvests over a 96 week period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–520 · show in text ↑
e5

“The time course of fertilizer S release varied between products”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–968 · show in text ↑
e6

“bonding method can affect S availability from S coated TSP products”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1051 · show in text ↑

lime · yield · Trifolium repens (white clover)Results differ

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

lime · yield · LoliumPositive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.