Paper · 2011 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Performance evaluation of rice varieties under the System of Rice Intensification compared with the conventional transplanting system

Amod Kumar Thakur; Sreelata Rath; Ashwani Kumar

10
claims
24
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Deras Research Farm, Khurda district, Bhubaneswar, Orissa, India, to evaluate the performance of different rice varieties managed under System of Rice Intensification (SRI) compared with the current transplanting system (CTS). Five rice varieties were used for the study: (i) Khandagiri (early-duration, 90 days); (ii) Lalat (early-medium duration, 110 days); (iii) Surendra (late-medium duration, 130 days); (iv) Hybrid CRHR-7 (late-medium duration, 135 days); and (v) Savitri (long-duration, 145 days). It was seen that SRI practices significantly (p < 0.05) improved the harvest index, percentage of effective tillers, panicle length, and various yield components in all the varieties. SRI hills having an open-canopy structure with higher leaf area index (LAI) resulted in greater light interception than the conventional transplanting methods. At the ripening stage, SRI plants had better root growth and a higher xylem exudation rate than CTS plants. This was associated with higher levels of chlorophyll in the lower leaves and a higher photosynthesis rate. Delayed senescence with enhanced photosynthesis in the lower leaves was also responsible for supplying more assimilates toward the roots for maintaining their higher activity. These features might also contribute to the improvement of grain filling and grain weight in SRI-grown plants as all the varieties performed better in terms of grain yield (12–42% higher) with this alternative management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI practices significantly (p < 0.05) improved harvest index, percentage of effective tillers and panicle length in all five rice varieties relative to the current transplanting system.

Treatment
SRI practicese0
Outcome
harvest index, percentage of effective tillers, panicle lengthe0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
current transplanting system (CTS)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“SRI practices significantly (p < 0.05) improved the harvest index, percentage of effective tillers, panicle length, and various yield components in all the varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–723 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with the current transplanting system (CTS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–261 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI practices significantly (p < 0.05) improved various yield components in all five rice varieties relative to the current transplanting system.

Treatment
SRI practicese0
Outcome
various yield componentse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
current transplanting system (CTS)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“SRI practices significantly (p < 0.05) improved the harvest index, percentage of effective tillers, panicle length, and various yield components in all the varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–723 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with the current transplanting system (CTS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–261 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI hills with an open-canopy structure had a higher leaf area index than conventional transplanting.

Treatment
SRI hillse0
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
conventional transplanting methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“SRI hills having an open-canopy structure with higher leaf area index (LAI) resulted in greater light interception than the conventional transplanting methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI hills with an open canopy and higher LAI resulted in greater light interception than conventional transplanting.

Treatment
SRI hillse0
Outcome
light interceptione0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
conventional transplanting methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“SRI hills having an open-canopy structure with higher leaf area index (LAI) resulted in greater light interception than the conventional transplanting methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the ripening stage, SRI plants had better root growth than CTS plants.

Organ / stage
ripening stagee0
Treatment
SRI plantse0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
CTS plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“At the ripening stage, SRI plants had better root growth and a higher xylem exudation rate than CTS plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–991 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the ripening stage, SRI plants had a higher xylem exudation rate than CTS plants.

Organ / stage
ripening stagee0
Treatment
SRI plantse0
Outcome
xylem exudation ratee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
CTS plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“At the ripening stage, SRI plants had better root growth and a higher xylem exudation rate than CTS plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–991 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In SRI plants, higher chlorophyll levels in the lower leaves and a higher photosynthesis rate were associated with better root growth and xylem exudation.

Organ / stage
lower leavese0
Treatment
SRI plantse1
Outcome
chlorophyll in the lower leaves and a higher photosynthesis ratee0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher levels of chlorophyll in the lower leaves and a higher photosynthesis rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1099 · show in text ↑
e1

“At the ripening stage, SRI plants had better root growth and a higher xylem exudation rate than CTS plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–991 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed senescence with enhanced photosynthesis in the lower leaves was responsible for supplying more assimilates to the roots, maintaining their higher activity.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
higher activitye0
Qualifier
Delayed senescence with enhanced photosynthesis in the lower leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“Delayed senescence with enhanced photosynthesis in the lower leaves was also responsible for supplying more assimilates toward the roots for maintaining their higher activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All rice varieties had 12-42% higher grain yield under SRI than under the current transplanting system.

Treatment
this alternative managemente0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
12–42%e0
Comparator
current transplanting system (CTS)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“all the varieties performed better in terms of grain yield (12–42% higher) with this alternative management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1497 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with the current transplanting system (CTS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–261 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The SRI features might also contribute to improved grain filling and grain weight in SRI-grown plants.

Treatment
SRI-grown plantse0
Outcome
grain filling and grain weighte0
Qualifier
might also contributee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“These features might also contribute to the improvement of grain filling and grain weight in SRI-grown plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1386 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

221 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.