Intervention effectmodel-written summary

SRI practices significantly (p < 0.05) improved various yield components in all five rice varieties relative to the current transplanting system.

A claim from Performance evaluation of rice varieties under the System of Rice Intensification compared with the conventional transplanting system · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI practices significantly (p < 0.05) improved various yield components in all five rice varieties relative to the current transplanting system.

Treatment
SRI practicese0
Outcome
various yield componentse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
current transplanting system (CTS)e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40
e0

“SRI practices significantly (p < 0.05) improved the harvest index, percentage of effective tillers, panicle length, and various yield components in all the varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–723
e1

“compared with the current transplanting system (CTS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–261

Title

Performance evaluation of rice varieties under the System of Rice Intensification compared with the conventional transplanting system

Amod Kumar Thakur; Sreelata Rath; Ashwani Kumar Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 2011. doi:10.1080/03650340903302302

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e0e3be0ca46e8de4eb919325cb4bef250e8cc32bf97d9e3ae153330278953fec · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this claim · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

1,162 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.