Paper · 2009 · http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/yadda/element/bwmeta1.element.dl-catalog-13d3a86b-468c-4c87-ab90-63b3adef1770/c/000010200900008000030003700042.pdf

Improvement of the effectiveness of maize (Zea mays L.) fertilization with nitrogen by the application of magnesium Part III. Quality of ears designed for silage CCM.

Piotr Szulc

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract. A field experiment was established at the Experimental and Didactic Station in Swadzim near Pozna over 2004-2007 (52o26 ’ N; 16o45 ’ E). The experiment was carried out in a ‘split-plot ’ design with 3 research factors in 4 field replications. 2 types of maize hybrids, 6 doses of nitrogen and magnesium doses (including methods of their applications) were examined. The effect of these research factors on the proportion of nutrients and raw material energy value of two types of maize hybrids grown for ear silage were assessed. The hybrid of stay-green type contained less crude fibre but more crude fat in dry matter of ears as compared with the traditional hybrid. The largest amounts of net energy concentration, net energy yield, digestible protein yield and total protein yield were obtained by applying a nitrogen dose of 120 kg N·ha-1. Fertilizing maize with N + Mg (in rows and by broadcasting), an increase in total protein yield was obtained in relation to the treatments with N fertilization only.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stay-green maize hybrid ears had less crude fibre than the traditional hybrid.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Material
hybrid of stay-green typee0
Organ / stage
earse0
Outcome
crude fibree0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
traditional hybride0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hybrid of stay-green type contained less crude fibre but more crude fat in dry matter of ears as compared with the traditional hybrid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–678 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stay-green maize hybrid ears had more crude fat than the traditional hybrid.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Material
hybrid of stay-green typee0
Organ / stage
earse0
Outcome
crude fate0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
traditional hybride0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hybrid of stay-green type contained less crude fibre but more crude fat in dry matter of ears as compared with the traditional hybrid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–678 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

net energy concentration was largest at a nitrogen dose of 120 kg N·ha-1.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
nitrogen dose of 120 kg N·ha-1e0
Outcome
net energy concentratione0
Direction
largeste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The largest amounts of net energy concentration, net energy yield, digestible protein yield and total protein yield were obtained by applying a nitrogen dose of 120 kg N·ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–854 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

net energy yield was largest at a nitrogen dose of 120 kg N·ha-1.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
nitrogen dose of 120 kg N·ha-1e0
Outcome
net energy yielde0
Direction
largeste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The largest amounts of net energy concentration, net energy yield, digestible protein yield and total protein yield were obtained by applying a nitrogen dose of 120 kg N·ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–854 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

digestible protein yield was largest at a nitrogen dose of 120 kg N·ha-1.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
nitrogen dose of 120 kg N·ha-1e0
Outcome
digestible protein yielde0
Direction
largeste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The largest amounts of net energy concentration, net energy yield, digestible protein yield and total protein yield were obtained by applying a nitrogen dose of 120 kg N·ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–854 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

total protein yield was largest at a nitrogen dose of 120 kg N·ha-1.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
nitrogen dose of 120 kg N·ha-1e0
Outcome
total protein yielde0
Direction
largeste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The largest amounts of net energy concentration, net energy yield, digestible protein yield and total protein yield were obtained by applying a nitrogen dose of 120 kg N·ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–854 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N plus Mg fertilization increased maize total protein yield relative to N fertilization alone.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
N + Mg (in rows and by broadcasting)e0
Outcome
total protein yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
N fertilization onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizing maize with N + Mg (in rows and by broadcasting), an increase in total protein yield was obtained in relation to the treatments with N fertilization only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1020 · show in text ↑

magnesium atom · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

transplanting · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.