Paper · 2010 · Journal of Plant Biotechnology

Growth regulation of cow1 rice mutant seedlings by blue light

Chang-Hyo Goh; Suk-Min Ko; Hee-Yeon Park; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

We assessed whether the cow1 mutant defects are associated with growth of Tos17 and T-DNA insertional rice in blue light (BL). Growth of oscow1 mutants which encoded a member of the YUCCA protein family was retarded in BL. Root to shoot ratios of the mutants were reduced about 2 times lower in the absence of NAA and about 2.5 times lower in the presence of NAA; the shoot growth was not significantly changed by NAA addition. Photosynthetic activity of the mutants was however inhibited in high light. Pigment analysis showed significant difference between wild-type (Chl a:b = 3.02) and mutants (3.84). Carotenoid contents of the mutants were also decreased considerably, implying the involvement of cow1 in pigment formation. These findings lead us to suggest that the growth retardation of oscow1 mutant plants by BL results from the difference of photosynthetic activity in part.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue light retarded oscow1 mutant growth.

Material
oscow1 mutantse0
Treatment
BLe0
Outcome
Growthe0
Direction
retardede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth of oscow1 mutants which encoded a member of the YUCCA protein family was retarded in BL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–222 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth regulation of cow1 rice mutant seedlings by blue light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mutant root to shoot ratio was about two times lower without NAA.

Material
mutantse0
Outcome
Root to shoot ratiose0
Direction
reducede0
Value
about 2 timese0
Qualifier
absence of NAAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root to shoot ratios of the mutants were reduced about 2 times lower in the absence of NAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–313 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth regulation of cow1 rice mutant seedlings by blue light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mutant root to shoot ratio was about 2.5 times lower with NAA.

Material
mutantst0
Outcome
Root to shoot ratiose1
Direction
lowere0
Value
about 2.5 timese0
Qualifier
presence of NAAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“about 2.5 times lower in the presence of NAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–362 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth regulation of cow1 rice mutant seedlings by blue light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“Root to shoot ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–243 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA did not significantly change shoot growth.

Treatment
NAA additione0
Outcome
shoot growthe0
Direction
not significantly changede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the shoot growth was not significantly changed by NAA addition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–427 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth regulation of cow1 rice mutant seedlings by blue light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High light inhibited mutant photosynthetic activity.

Material
mutantse0
Treatment
high lighte0
Outcome
Photosynthetic activitye0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthetic activity of the mutants was however inhibited in high light.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–503 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth regulation of cow1 rice mutant seedlings by blue light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll a:b ratio differed significantly between wild type at 3.02 and mutants at 3.84.

Material
mutantse0
Outcome
Chl a:be0
Value
3.84e0
Qualifier
3.02e0
Comparator
wild-typee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant difference between wild-type (Chl a:b = 3.02) and mutants (3.84).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–605 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth regulation of cow1 rice mutant seedlings by blue light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mutant carotenoid content decreased considerably.

Material
mutantse0
Outcome
Carotenoid contentse0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carotenoid contents of the mutants were also decreased considerably”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–673 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth regulation of cow1 rice mutant seedlings by blue light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest altered photosynthetic activity partly explains blue light growth retardation.

Material
oscow1 mutant plantse0
Outcome
growth retardatione0
Qualifier
difference of photosynthetic activitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth retardation of oscow1 mutant plants by BL results from the difference of photosynthetic activity in part.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–885 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth regulation of cow1 rice mutant seedlings by blue light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

71 papers: 65 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 65 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.