Paper · 2003 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Comparison of pre-treatments for inducing germination in highly dormant wheat genotypes

M. A. Matus-Cádiz; P. Hucl

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An effective dormancy-breaking method may be of interest to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) breeders selecting for increased seed dormancy prior to advancing their populations in greenhouse grow-outs. The objective of this study was to identify an effective pre-treatment for breaking dormancy in wheat that did not result in seedling etiolation. In 2000, eight dormant (W98616, line 211, EMDR-4, EMDR-9, EMDR-14, RL4137, Columbus, and AC Domain) and one nondormant line (Roblin) were grown at two locations in Saskatchewan. Seeds were: (i) stored for zero to 21 wks at 24°C before incubating at 20°C for 7 d; (ii) incubated at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25°C for 14 d; and (iii) treated with gibberellic acid (GA 3 ) (0.0006 and 0.0014 M), potassium nitrate (KNO 3 ) (0.01 and 0.02 M), chilling, heating, chilling with 0.01 M KNO 3 , and heating with 0.01 M KNO 3 before incubating at 10°C for 14 d. Seedling growth was observed in a duplicated growth chamber experiment. Seedling length, first inter-node length, and biomass yield data were collected from plants grown from seeds treated with four effective pretreatments. Data were subjected to an ANOVA. Six to 18 weeks of storage at 24°C were required to break the dormancy (≥ 95% germination) in dormant genotypes. Incubation at 10°C was the most effective temperature for promoting germination in dormant seeds after 10d of testing. Four pre-treatments including 0.0006 M GA 3 , 0.0014 M GA 3 , chilling with 0.01 M KNO 3 , and heating with 0.01 M KNO 3 led to ≥ 95% germination within 10 d of testing. Only GA 3 treatments were associated with etiolated seedling growth. Heating with 0.01 M KNO 3 or chilling with 0.01 M KNO 3 , applied before incubating at 10°C in darkness, may be of interest to breeders selecting for increased dormancy before advancing breeding populations in greenhouse grow-outs. Key words: Triticum, dormancy, nitrate, chilling, heating, etiolated seedling

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six to 18 weeks of storage at 24°C broke dormancy in dormant wheat genotypes.

Material
dormant genotypese0
Treatment
Six to 18 weeks of storage at 24°Ce0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
break the dormancye0
Value
≥ 95%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Six to 18 weeks of storage at 24°C were required to break the dormancy (≥ 95% germination) in dormant genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1259 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incubation at 10°C most effectively promoted germination after 10 days.

Treatment
Incubation at 10°Ce0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
most effectivee0
Qualifier
after 10d of testinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Incubation at 10°C was the most effective temperature for promoting germination in dormant seeds after 10d of testing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1378 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

0.0006 M GA 3 yielded at least 95% germination within 10 days.

Treatment
0.0006 M GA 3e0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
led toe0
Value
≥ 95%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four pre-treatments including 0.0006 M GA 3 , 0.0014 M GA 3 , chilling with 0.01 M KNO 3 , and heating with 0.01 M KNO 3 led to ≥ 95% germination within 10 d of testing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1548 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

0.0014 M GA 3 yielded at least 95% germination within 10 days.

Treatment
0.0014 M GA 3e0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
led toe0
Value
≥ 95%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four pre-treatments including 0.0006 M GA 3 , 0.0014 M GA 3 , chilling with 0.01 M KNO 3 , and heating with 0.01 M KNO 3 led to ≥ 95% germination within 10 d of testing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1548 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilling with 0.01 M KNO 3 yielded at least 95% germination within 10 days.

Treatment
chilling with 0.01 M KNO 3e0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
led toe0
Value
≥ 95%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four pre-treatments including 0.0006 M GA 3 , 0.0014 M GA 3 , chilling with 0.01 M KNO 3 , and heating with 0.01 M KNO 3 led to ≥ 95% germination within 10 d of testing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1548 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heating with 0.01 M KNO 3 yielded at least 95% germination within 10 days.

Treatment
heating with 0.01 M KNO 3e0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
led toe0
Value
≥ 95%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four pre-treatments including 0.0006 M GA 3 , 0.0014 M GA 3 , chilling with 0.01 M KNO 3 , and heating with 0.01 M KNO 3 led to ≥ 95% germination within 10 d of testing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1548 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only GA 3 treatments were associated with etiolated seedling growth.

Treatment
GA 3 treatmentse0
Outcome
etiolated seedling growthe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only GA 3 treatments were associated with etiolated seedling growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1617 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–87 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose heating with 0.01 M KNO 3 for breeders selecting dormancy.

Treatment
Heating with 0.01 M KNO 3e0
Outcome
Heating with 0.01 M KNO 3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heating with 0.01 M KNO 3 or chilling with 0.01 M KNO 3 , applied before incubating at 10°C in darkness, may be of interest to breeders selecting for increased dormancy before advancing breeding populations in greenhouse grow-outs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1618–1849 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–87 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose chilling with 0.01 M KNO 3 for breeders selecting dormancy.

Treatment
chilling with 0.01 M KNO 3e0
Outcome
chilling with 0.01 M KNO 3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heating with 0.01 M KNO 3 or chilling with 0.01 M KNO 3 , applied before incubating at 10°C in darkness, may be of interest to breeders selecting for increased dormancy before advancing breeding populations in greenhouse grow-outs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1618–1849 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–87 · show in text ↑

storage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 26 positive, 22 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

cold · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

88 papers: 34 positive, 54 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

heat · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 42 positive, 89 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 88 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.