Paper · 2012 · Tree Physiology

Interacting effects of elevated CO2 and weather variability on photosynthesis of mature boreal Norway spruce agree with biochemical model predictions

J. Uddling; G. Wallin

8
claims
21
verbatim quotes
29
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

According to well-known biochemical and biophysical mechanisms, the stimulation of C(3) photosynthesis by elevated atmospheric CO(2) concentration ([CO(2)]) is strongly modified by changes in temperature and radiation. In order to investigate whether a static parameterization of the commonly used Farquhar et al. model of photosynthesis (i.e., without CO(2)-induced seasonal or thermal acclimation of photosynthetic capacity) can accurately predict these interactions in mature boreal Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) during the frost-free part of the growing season, shoot gas exchange was continuously measured on trees during their second/third year of exposure to ambient or doubled [CO(2)] inside whole-tree chambers. The relative CO(2)-induced enhancement of net photosynthesis (A(n)) at a given temperature remained stable over the study period, but increased strongly with temperature and radiation, in agreement with predictions by the model. Light-saturated A(n) (+67% at 20 °C), dark respiration (+36%) and intercellular to ambient [CO(2)] ratio (c(i)/c(a); +27%) were significantly increased by CO(2) treatment. Stomatal conductance (g(s)) was not significantly affected. Our results demonstrate that the Farquhar et al. model of photosynthesis has the capability to predict interactions between [CO(2)] and seasonal weather variability on A(n) in Norway spruce during the non-frost growing season without accounting for CO(2)-induced seasonal and/or thermal photosynthetic acclimation. However, stomatal model assumptions of reduced g(s) and constant c(i)/c(a) under rising atmospheric [CO(2)] did not hold.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative CO2 enhancement of photosynthesis was stable over the study period at a given temperature.

Taxon
Norway sprucePicea abiest0
Outcome
net photosynthesise0
Direction
remained stablee0
Qualifier
at a given temperaturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea abies
Picea abies · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 ee · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative CO(2)-induced enhancement of net photosynthesis (A(n)) at a given temperature remained stable over the study period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–859 · show in text ↑
t0

“Norway spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative CO2 enhancement of photosynthesis rose with temperature and radiation.

Taxon
Norway sprucePicea abiest0
Treatment
temperature and radiatione0
Outcome
net photosynthesise1
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
temperature and radiatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea abies
Picea abies · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 ee · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased strongly with temperature and radiation, in agreement with predictions by the model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“Norway spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“net photosynthesis (A(n))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Doubled CO2 increased light-saturated net photosynthesis by 67% at 20 °C.

Taxon
Norway sprucePicea abiest0
Treatment
CO(2) treatmente0
Outcome
Light-saturated A(n)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
+67%e0
Qualifier
at 20 °Ce0
Comparator
ambiente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea abies
Picea abies · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 ee · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Light-saturated A(n) (+67% at 20 °C), dark respiration (+36%) and intercellular to ambient [CO(2)] ratio (c(i)/c(a); +27%) were significantly increased by CO(2) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“Norway spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“ambient or doubled [CO(2)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Doubled CO2 increased dark respiration by 36%.

Taxon
Norway sprucePicea abiest0
Treatment
CO(2) treatmente0
Outcome
dark respiratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
+36%e0
Comparator
ambiente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea abies
Picea abies · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 ee · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Light-saturated A(n) (+67% at 20 °C), dark respiration (+36%) and intercellular to ambient [CO(2)] ratio (c(i)/c(a); +27%) were significantly increased by CO(2) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“Norway spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“ambient or doubled [CO(2)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Doubled CO2 increased intercellular to ambient CO2 ratio by 27%.

Taxon
Norway sprucePicea abiest0
Treatment
CO(2) treatmente0
Outcome
intercellular to ambient [CO(2)] ratioe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
+27%e0
Comparator
ambiente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea abies
Picea abies · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 ee · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Light-saturated A(n) (+67% at 20 °C), dark respiration (+36%) and intercellular to ambient [CO(2)] ratio (c(i)/c(a); +27%) were significantly increased by CO(2) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“Norway spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“ambient or doubled [CO(2)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal conductance was not significantly affected by CO2 treatment.

Taxon
Norway sprucePicea abiest0
Treatment
CO(2) treatmente1
Outcome
Stomatal conductancee0
Comparator
ambiente2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea abies
Picea abies · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 ee · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stomatal conductance (g(s)) was not significantly affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1190 · show in text ↑
t0

“Norway spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“CO(2) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1130 · show in text ↑
e2

“ambient or doubled [CO(2)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–702 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Farquhar model predicted CO2 by seasonal weather interactions in spruce photosynthesis without acclimation.

Taxon
Norway sprucePicea abiese0
Outcome
predict interactions between [CO(2)] and seasonal weather variability on A(n)e0
Qualifier
without accounting for CO(2)-induced seasonal and/or thermal photosynthetic acclimatione0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea abies
Picea abies · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 ee · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Farquhar et al. model of photosynthesis has the capability to predict interactions between [CO(2)] and seasonal weather variability on A(n) in Norway spruce during the non-frost growing season without accounting for CO(2)-induced seasonal and/or thermal photosynthetic acclimation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1505 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal model assumptions of reduced conductance and constant CO2 ratio did not hold.

Taxon
Norway sprucePicea abiest0
Outcome
stomatal model assumptionse0
Qualifier
under rising atmospheric [CO(2)]e0
Comparator
reduced g(s) and constant c(i)/c(a)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea abies
Picea abies · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 ee · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stomatal model assumptions of reduced g(s) and constant c(i)/c(a) under rising atmospheric [CO(2)] did not hold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1516–1627 · show in text ↑
t0

“Norway spruce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–108 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: gas exchange · Picea abies (Norway spruce)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.