Paper · 2011 · International journal of agriscience.

Effects of deficit irrigation on grain yield and some morphological traits of wheat cultivars in drought - prone conditions

H Akbari Moghaddam; M. Galavi; Hamid Reza Fanaei; et al.

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the influence of deficit irrigation on grain yield and some morphological traits of wheat cultivars. The experiment was a split plot randomized complete block design in four replications over two successive cropping seasons (2006-2008) at the Agricultural Research Station in Zahak, Iran. In the main plots were the different levels of deficit irrigation: T1= irrigation at all stages (full irrigation), T2= no irrigation before stem elongation, T3= no irrigation before flowering and T4= no irrigation before grain filling. Sampled in the sub plots were the four wheat cultivars: Hamoon, Kavir, Dez and Peethee nr2. The results of combined analysis of variance showed that the effect of irrigation in both seasons was significant on grain yield and morphological traits. The highest grain yield resulted from irrigation at all stages with a yield of 6275 kg/ha. Deficit irrigation was found to decrease grain yield by 5% at no irrigation before stem elongation, by 32% at no irrigation before flowering and by 52% at no irrigation before grain filling. Deficit irrigation affected the characteristics of; spikes/m 2 , biomass and harvest index. Grain yields were significantly different between the cultivars: Hamoon and Kavir cultivars produced the highest (5540kg/ha) and the least (4326kg/ha) grain yields, respectively. Hamoon had a higher drought tolerance therefore greater grain yield than the other cultivars in conditions of a drought-prone environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation produced the highest grain yield, 6275 kg/ha.

Treatment
irrigation at all stagese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6275 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield resulted from irrigation at all stages with a yield of 6275 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–899 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No irrigation before stem elongation decreased grain yield by 5%.

Treatment
no irrigation before stem elongatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
5%e0
Comparator
full irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deficit irrigation was found to decrease grain yield by 5% at no irrigation before stem elongation, by 32% at no irrigation before flowering and by 52% at no irrigation before grain filling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1090 · show in text ↑
e1

“T1= irrigation at all stages (full irrigation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–440 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No irrigation before flowering decreased grain yield by 32%.

Treatment
no irrigation before floweringe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
32%e0
Comparator
full irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deficit irrigation was found to decrease grain yield by 5% at no irrigation before stem elongation, by 32% at no irrigation before flowering and by 52% at no irrigation before grain filling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1090 · show in text ↑
e1

“T1= irrigation at all stages (full irrigation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–440 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No irrigation before grain filling decreased grain yield by 52%.

Treatment
no irrigation before grain fillinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
52%e0
Comparator
full irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deficit irrigation was found to decrease grain yield by 5% at no irrigation before stem elongation, by 32% at no irrigation before flowering and by 52% at no irrigation before grain filling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1090 · show in text ↑
e1

“T1= irrigation at all stages (full irrigation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–440 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation affected spikes per square metre, biomass, and harvest index.

Treatment
Deficit irrigatione0
Outcome
spikes/m 2 , biomass and harvest indexe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deficit irrigation affected the characteristics of; spikes/m 2 , biomass and harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1182 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hamoon had the highest cultivar grain yield, 5540kg/ha.

Material
Hamoone0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5540kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hamoon and Kavir cultivars produced the highest (5540kg/ha) and the least (4326kg/ha) grain yields, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1361 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Kavir had the lowest cultivar grain yield, 4326kg/ha.

Material
Kavire0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
leaste0
Value
4326kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hamoon and Kavir cultivars produced the highest (5540kg/ha) and the least (4326kg/ha) grain yields, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1361 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hamoon had higher drought tolerance than other cultivars.

Material
Hamoone0
Outcome
drought tolerancee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the other cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hamoon had a higher drought tolerance therefore greater grain yield than the other cultivars in conditions of a drought-prone environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1500 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hamoon had greater grain yield than other cultivars in a drought-prone environment.

Material
Hamoone0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
the other cultivarse0
Setting
drought-prone environmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hamoon had a higher drought tolerance therefore greater grain yield than the other cultivars in conditions of a drought-prone environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1500 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–93 · show in text ↑

stage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 95 positive, 65 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.