Paper · 1985 · Bioelectromagnetics

A cytohistological analysis of roots whose growth is affected by a 60‐Hz electric field

Annie Brulfert; Morton W. Miller; Dominique Robertson; et al.

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Roots of Pisum sativum were exposed for 48 h to 60-Hz electric fields of 430 V/m in an aqueous inorganic growth medium. The growth in length of the exposed roots was 44% of that for control roots. Root tips were analyzed for mitotic index and cell cycle duration. Mature, differentiated root sections from tissue produced after electrode energization were analyzed for cell lengths and number of files. The major reason for the observation that exposed roots are shorter than control roots is that cell elongation in the former is greatly diminished relative to controls.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea roots exposed to a 60-Hz, 430 V/m field for 48 h grew to 44% of the length of control roots.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceuse0
Organ / stage
Rootse0
Treatment
60-Hz electric fields of 430 V/me0
Outcome
growth in lengthe1
Direction
shortere2
Value
44%e1
Qualifier
48 he0
Comparator
control rootse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Roots of Pisum sativum were exposed for 48 h to 60-Hz electric fields of 430 V/m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“The growth in length of the exposed roots was 44% of that for control roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–195 · show in text ↑
e2

“exposed roots are shorter than control roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–489 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced cell elongation was the major reason exposed roots were shorter than controls.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceuse1
Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
exposed roots are shorter than control rootse0
Qualifier
cell elongation in the former is greatly diminished relative to controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The major reason for the observation that exposed roots are shorter than control roots is that cell elongation in the former is greatly diminished relative to controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–570 · show in text ↑
e1

“Roots of Pisum sativum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑

physical treatment · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.