Paper · 1997 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

Effects of soil drought during the generative development phase on seed yield and nutrient uptake of faba bean ( Vicia faba )

M. Z. Xia

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of periods of drought during different phases of reproductive growth of faba bean ( Vicia faba L.) cv. Xichang Dabai were investigated in a pot experiment at Xichang Agricultural College, China. Parameters were total dry matter; seed yield; yield components; concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium; and total uptake in different organs. All drought treatments decreased total dry matter production and seed yield per plant. Plants subjected to drought from initiation of pod-set to full pod-set (stage D4) produced 32% less total dry matter and 45% less seed yield than the irrigated control. Mean seed weight was a relatively stable yield component. Statistical analysis indicated that only plants subjected to drought at stages D4 and D5 (drought from full pod-set to maturity) had a significantly ( P < 0·05) lower mean seed weight than the control. The nutrient concentration was generally high in the younger or more active organs of faba bean, and comparing the nutrients, the N concentration in leaves, stems, flowers, pods, and grain was greatest, followed by K concentration, and P concentration was least. All soil drought treatments decreased the nutrient concentration in various organs after 17–19 days of drought. However, the decreases at maturity were less clear, except the nutrient concentrations in stems and leaves. Water deficit significantly decreased total grain nutrients per plant, the decreases being 34–45% for N uptake, 34–47% for P uptake, and 33–46% for K uptake. Simple linear correlations with the P and K concentration in leaves at maturity and number of pods and seeds per plant gave a correlation coefficient ( r ) of 0·804–0·874.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All drought treatments reduced total dry matter and seed yield per plant.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Treatment
drought treatmentse0
Outcome
total dry matter production and seed yield per plante0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All drought treatments decreased total dry matter production and seed yield per plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–450 · show in text ↑
e1

“faba bean ( Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought from pod set initiation through full pod set reduced total dry matter by 32%.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Treatment
drought from initiation of pod-set to full pod-set (stage D4)e0
Outcome
total dry mattere0
Direction
lesse0
Value
32%e0
Comparator
irrigated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants subjected to drought from initiation of pod-set to full pod-set (stage D4) produced 32% less total dry matter and 45% less seed yield than the irrigated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–619 · show in text ↑
e1

“faba bean ( Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The D4 drought reduced seed yield 45% against irrigation.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Treatment
drought from initiation of pod-set to full pod-set (stage D4)e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
lesse0
Value
45%e0
Comparator
irrigated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants subjected to drought from initiation of pod-set to full pod-set (stage D4) produced 32% less total dry matter and 45% less seed yield than the irrigated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–619 · show in text ↑
e1

“faba bean ( Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean seed weight was relatively stable except for a significant reduction under D4 and D5 drought.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Treatment
drought at stages D4 and D5e0
Outcome
mean seed weighte0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only plants subjected to drought at stages D4 and D5 (drought from full pod-set to maturity) had a significantly ( P < 0·05) lower mean seed weight than the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–879 · show in text ↑
e1

“faba bean ( Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Younger or more active faba bean organs generally had high nutrient concentration.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Organ / stage
younger or more active organse0
Outcome
nutrient concentratione0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nutrient concentration was generally high in the younger or more active organs of faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–975 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen concentration was greatest, followed by potassium and phosphorus, across the listed organs.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Organ / stage
leaves, stems, flowers, pods, and graine0
Outcome
N concentratione0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
followed by K concentration, and P concentration was leaste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the N concentration in leaves, stems, flowers, pods, and grain was greatest, followed by K concentration, and P concentration was least.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1142 · show in text ↑
e1

“faba bean ( Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All soil drought treatments reduced organ nutrient concentrations after 17–19 days.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Treatment
soil drought treatmentse0
Outcome
nutrient concentratione0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
after 17–19 days of droughte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All soil drought treatments decreased the nutrient concentration in various organs after 17–19 days of drought.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1254 · show in text ↑
e1

“faba bean ( Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At maturity, nutrient concentration declines were less clear except in stems and leaves.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Outcome
nutrient concentrations in stems and leavese0
Direction
decreasese0
Qualifier
at maturitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the decreases at maturity were less clear, except the nutrient concentrations in stems and leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1362 · show in text ↑
e1

“faba bean ( Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit significantly reduced total grain nitrogen uptake by 34–45%.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Treatment
Water deficite0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
34–45%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water deficit significantly decreased total grain nutrients per plant, the decreases being 34–45% for N uptake, 34–47% for P uptake, and 33–46% for K uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1520 · show in text ↑
e1

“faba bean ( Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit significantly reduced total grain phosphorus uptake by 34–47%.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Treatment
Water deficite0
Outcome
P uptakee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
34–47%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water deficit significantly decreased total grain nutrients per plant, the decreases being 34–45% for N uptake, 34–47% for P uptake, and 33–46% for K uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1520 · show in text ↑
e1

“faba bean ( Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit significantly reduced total grain potassium uptake by 33–46%.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Treatment
Water deficite0
Outcome
K uptakee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
33–46%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water deficit significantly decreased total grain nutrients per plant, the decreases being 34–45% for N uptake, 34–47% for P uptake, and 33–46% for K uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1520 · show in text ↑
e1

“faba bean ( Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf phosphorus and potassium concentration at maturity correlated with pod and seed counts, r 0.804–0.874.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Organ / stage
leaves at maturitye0
Compound
P and Ke0
Outcome
number of pods and seeds per plante0
Value
0·804–0·874e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Simple linear correlations with the P and K concentration in leaves at maturity and number of pods and seeds per plant gave a correlation coefficient ( r ) of 0·804–0·874.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1692 · show in text ↑
e1

“faba bean ( Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ

40 papers: 7 positive, 33 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

drought · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 6 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

drought · nutrient: content · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.