Paper · 2012 · Journal of Stored Products and Postharvest Research

Influence of different soil amendments on postharvest performance of tomato cv. power (Lycopersicon esculentum, Mill)

Nyamah EY

11
claims
32
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The experiment was conducted to test the influence of different soil amendments types on postharvest performance of tomato fruits. The soil amendments were NPK 15-15-15 at 250kg/ha plus ‘Asasewura’ cocoa fertilizer (NPK 0-22-18 + 9CaO + 6s + 5MgO(s) at (250kg/ha), NPK 15-15-15 at 250kg/ha plus sulphate of ammonia (125kg/ha), poultry manure (1.1kg/ m²) and control (no amendment). Selected quality traits of tomato fruits harvested at the pink colour stage were evaluated after seven (7) days storage under average temperatures of 26.85°C and relative humidity of 85.75%. Fruit quality traits studied were fruit weight loss, firmness, general appearance, membrane ion leakage, pericarp thickness, decay, total soluble solids, pericarp weight, dry matter, moisture content and fruit shelf life. Significant differences among the soil amendments (P < 0.002) were observed in fruit quality traits studied. Fruits harvested from soil amended with NPK plus ‘Asasewura’ cocoa fertilizer recorded lower in weight loss, membrane ion leakage decay and moisture content and higher fruit firmness, general appearance, total soluble solids, dry matter and shelf life than fruits harvested from fields amended with NPK plus Sulphate of ammonia, Poultry manure and Control respectively. Significant correlations (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05) were observed among the quality traits evaluated. Fruit weight loss showed significantly but negative correlation between fruit firmness (-0.71) and shelf life (-0.71) but indicated significant but positive correlation between membrane ion leakage (0.63) and fruit decay (0.57) respectively. Fruit pericarp thickness showed significant but positive correlation between general appearance (0.69), pericarp weight (0.68) and total soluble solids (0.73). Key words: Amendments, tomato, Asasewura cocoa fertilizer, postharvest, performance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil amendment with NPK plus Asasewura cocoa fertilizer lowered fruit weight loss, membrane ion leakage and decay relative to NPK plus sulphate of ammonia, poultry manure and control.

Organ / stage
Fruitse1
Treatment
NPK plus ‘Asasewura’ cocoa fertilizere1
Outcome
weight loss, membrane ion leakage decaye1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
NPK plus Sulphate of ammonia, Poultry manure and Controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“postharvest performance of tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruits harvested from soil amended with NPK plus ‘Asasewura’ cocoa fertilizer recorded lower in weight loss, membrane ion leakage decay and moisture content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1060 · show in text ↑
e2

“than fruits harvested from fields amended with NPK plus Sulphate of ammonia, Poultry manure and Control respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1272 · show in text ↑
e7

“Significant differences among the soil amendments (P < 0.002) were observed in fruit quality traits studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–902 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil amendment with NPK plus Asasewura cocoa fertilizer lowered fruit moisture content relative to the other amendments and control.

Organ / stage
Fruitse1
Treatment
NPK plus ‘Asasewura’ cocoa fertilizere1
Outcome
moisture contente1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
NPK plus Sulphate of ammonia, Poultry manure and Controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“postharvest performance of tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruits harvested from soil amended with NPK plus ‘Asasewura’ cocoa fertilizer recorded lower in weight loss, membrane ion leakage decay and moisture content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1060 · show in text ↑
e2

“than fruits harvested from fields amended with NPK plus Sulphate of ammonia, Poultry manure and Control respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1272 · show in text ↑
e7

“Significant differences among the soil amendments (P < 0.002) were observed in fruit quality traits studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–902 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil amendment with NPK plus Asasewura cocoa fertilizer raised fruit firmness, general appearance and total soluble solids relative to the comparators.

Treatment
NPK plus ‘Asasewura’ cocoa fertilizere1
Outcome
fruit firmness, general appearance, total soluble solidse3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
NPK plus Sulphate of ammonia, Poultry manure and Controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“postharvest performance of tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruits harvested from soil amended with NPK plus ‘Asasewura’ cocoa fertilizer recorded lower in weight loss, membrane ion leakage decay and moisture content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1060 · show in text ↑
e2

“than fruits harvested from fields amended with NPK plus Sulphate of ammonia, Poultry manure and Control respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1272 · show in text ↑
e3

“higher fruit firmness, general appearance, total soluble solids, dry matter and shelf life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1155 · show in text ↑
e7

“Significant differences among the soil amendments (P < 0.002) were observed in fruit quality traits studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–902 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil amendment with NPK plus Asasewura cocoa fertilizer raised dry matter and shelf life relative to the comparators.

Treatment
NPK plus ‘Asasewura’ cocoa fertilizere1
Outcome
dry matter and shelf lifee3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
NPK plus Sulphate of ammonia, Poultry manure and Controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“postharvest performance of tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruits harvested from soil amended with NPK plus ‘Asasewura’ cocoa fertilizer recorded lower in weight loss, membrane ion leakage decay and moisture content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1060 · show in text ↑
e2

“than fruits harvested from fields amended with NPK plus Sulphate of ammonia, Poultry manure and Control respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1272 · show in text ↑
e3

“higher fruit firmness, general appearance, total soluble solids, dry matter and shelf life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1155 · show in text ↑
e7

“Significant differences among the soil amendments (P < 0.002) were observed in fruit quality traits studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–902 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit weight loss was significantly negatively correlated with fruit firmness (-0.71).

Organ / stage
Fruite4
Outcome
fruit firmnesse4
Direction
negativee4
Value
-0.71e4
Qualifier
Fruit weight losse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“postharvest performance of tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–129 · show in text ↑
e4

“Fruit weight loss showed significantly but negative correlation between fruit firmness (-0.71) and shelf life (-0.71)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1490 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit weight loss was significantly negatively correlated with shelf life (-0.71).

Organ / stage
Fruite4
Outcome
shelf lifee4
Direction
negativee4
Value
-0.71e4
Qualifier
Fruit weight losse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“postharvest performance of tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–129 · show in text ↑
e4

“Fruit weight loss showed significantly but negative correlation between fruit firmness (-0.71) and shelf life (-0.71)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1490 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit weight loss was significantly positively correlated with membrane ion leakage (0.63).

Organ / stage
fruite5
Outcome
membrane ion leakagee5
Direction
positivee5
Value
0.63e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“postharvest performance of tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–129 · show in text ↑
e5

“indicated significant but positive correlation between membrane ion leakage (0.63) and fruit decay (0.57)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1600 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit weight loss was significantly positively correlated with fruit decay (0.57).

Organ / stage
fruite5
Outcome
fruit decaye5
Direction
positivee5
Value
0.57e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“postharvest performance of tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–129 · show in text ↑
e5

“indicated significant but positive correlation between membrane ion leakage (0.63) and fruit decay (0.57)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1600 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pericarp thickness was positively correlated with general appearance (0.69).

Organ / stage
pericarpe6
Outcome
general appearancee6
Direction
positivee6
Value
0.69e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“postharvest performance of tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–129 · show in text ↑
e6

“Fruit pericarp thickness showed significant but positive correlation between general appearance (0.69), pericarp weight (0.68) and total soluble solids (0.73)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1773 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pericarp thickness was positively correlated with pericarp weight (0.68).

Organ / stage
pericarpe6
Outcome
pericarp weighte6
Direction
positivee6
Value
0.68e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“postharvest performance of tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–129 · show in text ↑
e6

“Fruit pericarp thickness showed significant but positive correlation between general appearance (0.69), pericarp weight (0.68) and total soluble solids (0.73)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1773 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pericarp thickness was positively correlated with total soluble solids (0.73).

Organ / stage
pericarpe6
Outcome
total soluble solidse6
Direction
positivee6
Value
0.73e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“postharvest performance of tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–129 · show in text ↑
e6

“Fruit pericarp thickness showed significant but positive correlation between general appearance (0.69), pericarp weight (0.68) and total soluble solids (0.73)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1773 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 90 positive, 21 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

fertilization · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 94 positive, 17 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 129 positive, 15 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.