Paper · 2007 · Weed Technology

Yield and Physiological Response of Peanut to Glyphosate Drift

Bridget R. Lassiter; Ian C. Burke; Walter E. Thomas; et al.

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
34
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Five experiments were conducted during 2001 and 2002 in North Carolina to evaluate peanut injury and pod yield when glyphosate was applied to 10 to 15 cm diameter peanut plants at rates ranging from 9 to 1,120 g ai/ha. Shikimic acid accumulation was determined in three of the five experiments. Visual foliar injury (necrosis and chlorosis) was noted 7 d after treatment (DAT) when glyphosate was applied at 18 g/ha or higher. Glyphosate at 280 g/ha or higher significantly injured the peanut plant and reduced pod yield. Shikimic acid accumulation was negatively correlated with visual injury and pod yield. The presence of shikimic acid can be detected using a leaf tissue assay, which is an effective diagnostic tool for determining exposure of peanut to glyphosate 7 DAT.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at 18 g/ha or higher caused visual foliar injury at 7 days.

Treatment
glyphosate was applied at 18 g/ha or highere0
Outcome
Visual foliar injury (necrosis and chlorosis)e0
Qualifier
7 d after treatment (DAT)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Visual foliar injury (necrosis and chlorosis) was noted 7 d after treatment (DAT) when glyphosate was applied at 18 g/ha or higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–425 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at 280 g/ha or higher significantly injured peanut.

Treatment
Glyphosate at 280 g/ha or highere0
Outcome
injured the peanut plante0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glyphosate at 280 g/ha or higher significantly injured the peanut plant and reduced pod yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–520 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at 280 g/ha or higher reduced pod yield.

Treatment
Glyphosate at 280 g/ha or highere0
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glyphosate at 280 g/ha or higher significantly injured the peanut plant and reduced pod yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–520 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shikimic acid accumulation was negatively correlated with visual injury.

Compound
Shikimic acide0
Outcome
visual injurye0
Direction
negativelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shikimic acid accumulation was negatively correlated with visual injury and pod yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–607 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shikimic acid accumulation was negatively correlated with pod yield.

Compound
Shikimic acide0
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
negativelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shikimic acid accumulation was negatively correlated with visual injury and pod yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–607 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A leaf assay detected shikimic acid as an exposure diagnostic at seven days.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
exposure of peanut to glyphosatee0
Value
7 DATe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The presence of shikimic acid can be detected using a leaf tissue assay, which is an effective diagnostic tool for determining exposure of peanut to glyphosate 7 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–774 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

9 papers: 3 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

glyphosate · physiology: pigments · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

glyphosate · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.