Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Dicamba plus glyphosate exposure at 25 DAP caused 1.6–2.3 times greater peanut injury than exposure at 50 and 75 DAP.

A claim from Response of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) to sublethal rates of dicamba plus glyphosate at different growth stages · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dicamba plus glyphosate exposure at 25 DAP caused 1.6–2.3 times greater peanut injury than exposure at 50 and 75 DAP.

Treatment
dicamba plus glyphosate at 25 DAPe1
Outcome
injurye1
Direction
greatere1
Value
1.6–2.3 timese1
Comparator
50 and 75 DAP exposurese1
Setting
Field experimentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiments were conducted in the summer of 2019 and 2020”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–370
e1

“Peanut exposure to dicamba plus glyphosate at 25 DAP resulted in 1.6–2.3 times greater injury and 3.4–8.5 times greater height and canopy width reductions compared to 50 and 75 DAP exposures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–870

Title

Response of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) to sublethal rates of dicamba plus glyphosate at different growth stages

Olumide S. Daramola; Prasanna Kharel; Joseph E. Iboyi; et al. Agronomy Journal 2023. doi:10.1002/agj2.21372

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-fa3f62db81ce2b4e6663cd9eb543dad36a02f759d99de42bdc4bf2f3f266c2cd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

glyphosate · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

dicamba · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.