Claim · model-written summary
Peanut injury was visible after dicamba in each site year.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- dicambae0
- Outcome
- peanut injurye0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In each site year, peanut injury was visible following exposure to dicamba.”
Title
Peanut (Arachis hypogea) Response to Low Rates of Dicamba at Reproductive Growth Stages
John W. Seale; Taghi Bararpour; Jason A. Bond; et al. Agriculture 2020. doi:10.3390/agriculture10090408
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Intervention effect Dicamba reduced peanut lateral growth regardless of treatment or growth stage.
- Observation Peanut injury peaked 14 days after dicamba exposure in both site years.
- Intervention effect Dicamba did not produce a yield difference in 2018.
- Intervention effect In 2017, dicamba at 1/32 X plus NIS reduced yield 16%.
- Intervention effect In 2017, dicamba at 1/16 X reduced yield 16%.
- Intervention effect In 2017, dicamba at 1/16 X plus NIS reduced yield 30%.