Paper · 2012 · International Journal of Agricultural Technology

Effects of antibiotics on biological control agents and their efficacy to control rice sheath blight (R. solani AG-I.1)

E. A. Maji; A. A. Shaibu

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effects of antibiotics on the growth of four strains of biological control agents (BCA) B-916 (Bacillus subtilis), P7-14 (Pseudomonas fluorescens), P9409 (P. resinovorans) and P10353 (P. malculicola) were tested by growing them on peptone potassium nitrate medium (PPM) ranged from 0.5 to 1000 ug/mL of four antibiotitics: ampicilin, hygromycin, kanamycin and rifampicin. Antibiotics affected the growth of some BCAs but not others. Some BCAs were able to withstand high concentrations of antibiotics and thus their growth was not affected. Sheath blight of rice (Oryza sativa) caused by Rhizoctonia solani AG-I.1 was effectively controlled by the antibiotics, BCAs and mutants depending on the compatibility of the BCA and antibiotics. The three antibiotics at 50 ug/mL) reduced sheath blight by 60-80% as measured by area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC). B-916 and P9409 controlled the disease over 75%, whereas P7-14 and P10353 were less effective. B-916 + ampicilin, P10353 + rifampicin and P9409 + rifampicin. (25 ug/mL) was mixed with a BCA (0.5 X 10 7 CFU/mL) were sensitive resulted, disease suppression was consistently weakened.When an antibiotic and a tolerant BCA were combined as P7-14 + hygromicin and P9409 + hygromycin, their efficacy was unchanged or enhanced. Compared with the parent BCA, bio-control efficacy of hyg R -714 and hyg R -9409 was significantly enhanced (P<0.05) or unchanged in other cases.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antibiotics affected the growth of some biocontrol agents but not others.

Treatment
Antibioticse1
Interactor
BCAse1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of some BCAse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Antibiotics affected the growth of some BCAs but not others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–431 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice sheath blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some biocontrol agents withstood high antibiotic concentrations, so their growth was not affected.

Treatment
high concentrations of antibioticse4
Interactor
BCAse4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growthe4
Direction
not affectede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Some BCAs were able to withstand high concentrations of antibiotics and thus their growth was not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–539 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice sheath blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three antibiotics at 50 ug/mL reduced rice sheath blight by 60-80%, measured as AUDPC.

Treatment
three antibiotics at 50 ug/mLe3
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solani AG-I.1Rhizoctonia solanie2pathogen
Outcome
sheath blighte3
Direction
reducede3
Value
60-80%e3
Qualifier
as measured by area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC)e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The three antibiotics at 50 ug/mL) reduced sheath blight by 60-80% as measured by area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–864 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sheath blight of rice (Oryza sativa) caused by Rhizoctonia solani AG-I.1 was effectively controlled by the antibiotics, BCAs and mutants depending on the compatibility of the BCA and antibiotics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B-916 controlled rice sheath blight over 75%.

Treatment
B-916e4
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solani AG-I.1Rhizoctonia solanie2pathogen
Second interactor
B-916e4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
the diseasee4
Direction
controllede4
Value
75%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e4

“B-916 and P9409 controlled the disease over 75%, whereas P7-14 and P10353 were less effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–959 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sheath blight of rice (Oryza sativa) caused by Rhizoctonia solani AG-I.1 was effectively controlled by the antibiotics, BCAs and mutants depending on the compatibility of the BCA and antibiotics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P9409 controlled rice sheath blight over 75%.

Treatment
P9409e4
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solani AG-I.1Rhizoctonia solanie2pathogen
Second interactor
P9409e4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
the diseasee4
Direction
controllede4
Value
75%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e4

“B-916 and P9409 controlled the disease over 75%, whereas P7-14 and P10353 were less effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–959 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sheath blight of rice (Oryza sativa) caused by Rhizoctonia solani AG-I.1 was effectively controlled by the antibiotics, BCAs and mutants depending on the compatibility of the BCA and antibiotics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P7-14 was less effective than B-916 and P9409 at controlling rice sheath blight.

Treatment
P7-14e4
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solani AG-I.1Rhizoctonia solanie2pathogen
Second interactor
P7-14e4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
the diseasee4
Direction
less effectivee4
Comparator
B-916 and P9409e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e4

“B-916 and P9409 controlled the disease over 75%, whereas P7-14 and P10353 were less effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–959 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sheath blight of rice (Oryza sativa) caused by Rhizoctonia solani AG-I.1 was effectively controlled by the antibiotics, BCAs and mutants depending on the compatibility of the BCA and antibiotics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P10353 was less effective than B-916 and P9409 at controlling rice sheath blight.

Treatment
P10353e4
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solani AG-I.1Rhizoctonia solanie2pathogen
Second interactor
P10353e4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
the diseasee4
Direction
less effectivee4
Comparator
B-916 and P9409e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e4

“B-916 and P9409 controlled the disease over 75%, whereas P7-14 and P10353 were less effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–959 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sheath blight of rice (Oryza sativa) caused by Rhizoctonia solani AG-I.1 was effectively controlled by the antibiotics, BCAs and mutants depending on the compatibility of the BCA and antibiotics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining antibiotics with sensitive biocontrol agents weakened rice sheath blight suppression.

Treatment
mixed with a BCAe5
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solani AG-I.1Rhizoctonia solanie2pathogen
Outcome
disease suppressione5
Direction
weakenede5
Qualifier
B-916 + ampicilin, P10353 + rifampicin and P9409 + rifampicine5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e5

“B-916 + ampicilin, P10353 + rifampicin and P9409 + rifampicin. (25 ug/mL) was mixed with a BCA (0.5 X 10 7 CFU/mL) were sensitive resulted, disease suppression was consistently weakened”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1146 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sheath blight of rice (Oryza sativa) caused by Rhizoctonia solani AG-I.1 was effectively controlled by the antibiotics, BCAs and mutants depending on the compatibility of the BCA and antibiotics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining tolerant biocontrol agents with hygromycin left their efficacy unchanged or enhanced.

Treatment
P7-14 + hygromicin and P9409 + hygromycine6
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solani AG-I.1Rhizoctonia solanie2pathogen
Outcome
efficacye6
Direction
unchanged or enhancede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e6

“When an antibiotic and a tolerant BCA were combined as P7-14 + hygromicin and P9409 + hygromycin, their efficacy was unchanged or enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1285 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sheath blight of rice (Oryza sativa) caused by Rhizoctonia solani AG-I.1 was effectively controlled by the antibiotics, BCAs and mutants depending on the compatibility of the BCA and antibiotics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-control efficacy of hyg R -714 was significantly enhanced compared with the parent BCA.

Material
hyg R -714e7
Treatment
hyg R -714e7
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solani AG-I.1Rhizoctonia solanie2pathogen
Outcome
bio-control efficacye7
Direction
significantly enhancede7
Qualifier
P<0.05e7
Comparator
parent BCAe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Compared with the parent BCA, bio-control efficacy of hyg R -714 and hyg R -9409 was significantly enhanced (P<0.05) or unchanged in other cases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1431 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sheath blight of rice (Oryza sativa) caused by Rhizoctonia solani AG-I.1 was effectively controlled by the antibiotics, BCAs and mutants depending on the compatibility of the BCA and antibiotics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-control efficacy of hyg R -9409 was significantly enhanced compared with the parent BCA.

Material
hyg R -9409e7
Treatment
hyg R -9409e7
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solani AG-I.1Rhizoctonia solanie2pathogen
Outcome
bio-control efficacye7
Direction
significantly enhancede7
Qualifier
P<0.05e7
Comparator
parent BCAe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Compared with the parent BCA, bio-control efficacy of hyg R -714 and hyg R -9409 was significantly enhanced (P<0.05) or unchanged in other cases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1431 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sheath blight of rice (Oryza sativa) caused by Rhizoctonia solani AG-I.1 was effectively controlled by the antibiotics, BCAs and mutants depending on the compatibility of the BCA and antibiotics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In other cases, bio-control efficacy of the hyg R strains was unchanged compared with the parent BCA.

Treatment
hyg R -714 and hyg R -9409e7
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solani AG-I.1Rhizoctonia solanie2pathogen
Outcome
bio-control efficacye7
Direction
unchangede7
Comparator
parent BCAe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Compared with the parent BCA, bio-control efficacy of hyg R -714 and hyg R -9409 was significantly enhanced (P<0.05) or unchanged in other cases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1431 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sheath blight of rice (Oryza sativa) caused by Rhizoctonia solani AG-I.1 was effectively controlled by the antibiotics, BCAs and mutants depending on the compatibility of the BCA and antibiotics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–735 · show in text ↑

antimicrobial agent · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

antimicrobial agent · Rhizoctonia solani · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

biocontrol · Rhizoctonia solani · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.