Paper · 2018 · Annals of Plant Protection Sciences

Management of sheath blight disease (Rhizoctonia solani L.) of Rice

Rao Yaduman; Abhilasha A. Lal; Shivam Singh; et al.

Read at the source ↗doi:10.5958/0974-0163.2018.00050.2 ↗OpenAlex W2797583421 ↗

2
claims
6
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

An experiment was carried out during two consecutive years (2013 & 2014) to manage sheath blight disease by using certain bio-agents (Trichoderma harzianum, Pseudomonas fluorescence and Bacillus subtilis) and chemicals (Carboxin, Carbendazim, Propiconazole & Hexaconazole) by taking different combinations (seed treatment & foliar spray) in transplanted rice crop. However, all the treatments were found superior over control. Various physical parameters and disease intensity % were also recorded and found significantly higher values.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All bio-agent and chemical treatments were superior to the control in managing sheath blight

Treatment
bio-agents (Trichoderma harzianum, Pseudomonas fluorescence and Bacillus subtilis) and chemicals (Carboxin, Carbendazim, Propiconazole & Hexaconazole)e0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanit0pathogen
Second interactor
Trichoderma harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
all the treatments were found superior over controle1
Direction
superiore1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · Second interactorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of sheath blight disease (Rhizoctonia solani L.) of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“to manage sheath blight disease by using certain bio-agents (Trichoderma harzianum, Pseudomonas fluorescence and Bacillus subtilis) and chemicals (Carboxin, Carbendazim, Propiconazole & Hexaconazole) by taking different combinations (seed treatment & foliar spray) in transplanted rice crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–363 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the treatments were found superior over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–425 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease intensity percentage was found significantly higher (comparison not stated)

Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanit0pathogen
Outcome
disease intensity %e2
Direction
highere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of sheath blight disease (Rhizoctonia solani L.) of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e0

“to manage sheath blight disease by using certain bio-agents (Trichoderma harzianum, Pseudomonas fluorescence and Bacillus subtilis) and chemicals (Carboxin, Carbendazim, Propiconazole & Hexaconazole) by taking different combinations (seed treatment & foliar spray) in transplanted rice crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–363 · show in text ↑
e2

“Various physical parameters and disease intensity % were also recorded and found significantly higher values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–535 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas · Rhizoctonia solani · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
    Jawahar Pseudomonas produced the minimum sheath blight incidence in both years compared with control.

    Management of sheath blight of rice using microbial formulations under in vivo condition · 2025 · compared with control

    Same direction

See all 2 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · Rhizoctonia solani · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
    BT1 inhibited R. solani mycelial growth in vitro.

    Biological Control of Rice Sheath Blight Disease (Rhizoctonia solani) Using Bio-pesticides and Bio-control Agents · 2021

    Same direction

  2. positive
    Seed and soil application of T. harzianum significantly reduced sheath blight incidence caused by Rhizoctonia solani.

    Evaluation of commercially available talc formulations of bioagents for management of sheath blight of rice and their effect on plant growth enhancement · 2017

    Same direction

  3. positive
    Trichoderma harzianum produced 64.73% in vitro mycelial inhibition.

    IN VITRO AND IN VIVO EVALUATION OF BIO-AGENTS AND PLANT EXTRACTS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF SHEATH BLIGHT IN PADDY (ORYZA SATIVA L.) · 2025 · compared with Propiconazole

    Same direction

See all 4 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · Rhizoctonia solani · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
    FZB24 inhibited R. solani by a maximum 36% versus control in vitro.

    Exploiting endophytic bacteria for the management of sheath blight disease in rice · 2013 · compared with control

    Same direction

  2. positive
    B. subtilis caused structural damage to R. solani hyphae in dual culture.

    Ultrastructural studies on the interaction between Bacillus subtilis MBI 600 (Integral) and the rice sheath blight pathogen, Rhizoctonia solani · 2013

    Same direction

  3. positive
    The combined application significantly reduced rice sheath blight incidence in pots and fields.

    Evaluation of bio inoculants fortified Lignite Fly Ash (LFA) against sheath blight (Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn) and sheath rot (Saracladium oryzae (Sawada) Games and Haksworth) diseases of rice in Cauvery delta region of Tamil Nadu · 2018

    Same direction

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

carbendazim · Rhizoctonia solani · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
    Three sprays of bavistin and mancozeb as cum-seed treatments brought down the incidence of sheath blight (Rhizoctonia solani) in rice.

    Management of Sheath blight and blast in rice through seed treatment · 2002

    Same direction

  2. positive
    Propiconazole, tebuconazole, hexaconazole and carbendazim + mancozeb completely inhibited in vitro radial growth of R. solani

    Efficacy of Tebuconazole Against Rhizocfonia solani, Causal Agent of Rice Sheath Blight · 2008

    Same direction

  3. positive
    Carbendazim gave the maximum in vitro sensitivity of R. solani, even at 1 ppm.

    Variability in Rhizoctonia solani causing sheath blight of rice and its chemical management · 2021

    Same direction

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

hexaconazole · Rhizoctonia solani · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
    Hexaconazole 5% EC had rice sheath blight incidence of 23.09%.

    Efficacy of New Combination Fungicide against Rice Sheath Blight Caused by Rhizoctonia solani (Kuhn) · 2012

    Same direction

  2. positive
    Propiconazole, tebuconazole, hexaconazole and carbendazim + mancozeb completely inhibited in vitro radial growth of R. solani

    Efficacy of Tebuconazole Against Rhizocfonia solani, Causal Agent of Rice Sheath Blight · 2008

    Same direction

  3. positive
    Hexaconazole caused complete inhibition of R. solani colony growth at 1000 ppm.

    Variability in Rhizoctonia solani causing sheath blight of rice and its chemical management · 2021

    Same direction

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

propiconazole · Rhizoctonia solani · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
    Propiconazole showed higher efficacy against R. solani and D. oryzae under laboratory conditions.

    Performance of some new fungicides against sheath blight and brown spot of rice · 2011

    Same direction

  2. positive
    Propiconazole, tebuconazole, hexaconazole and carbendazim + mancozeb completely inhibited in vitro radial growth of R. solani

    Efficacy of Tebuconazole Against Rhizocfonia solani, Causal Agent of Rice Sheath Blight · 2008

    Same direction

  3. positive
    Propiconazole 25 EC at 0.1 per cent reduced sheath blight disease severity by 86.0 per cent.

    Field evaluation of fungicides and botanicals against sheath blight, Rhizoctonia solani in rice (Oryza sativa L.) · 2016

    Same direction

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

biocontrol · Rhizoctonia solani · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Combining antibiotics with sensitive biocontrol agents weakened rice sheath blight suppression.

    Effects of antibiotics on biological control agents and their efficacy to control rice sheath blight (R. solani AG-I.1) · 2012

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Biological control agents controlled rice sheath blight with variable field efficacy of 50 to over 90%.

    Applying Rice Seed-Associated Antagonistic Bacteria to Manage Rice Sheath Blight in Developing Countries · 2004

    Same direction

  3. positive
    A fungal bio-agent applied 7 days before inoculation reduced disease by 67.0% compared with simultaneous application.

    Influence of formulations, doses and time of application of fungal Bio-agents on Rice Sheath blight · 2006 · compared with simultaneous application

    Same direction

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.