Paper · 2015 · Journal of Horticulture

Propagation Principles in Using Indole-3-Butyric Acid for Rooting Rosemary Stem Cuttings

MA Elhaak MZ Matter

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
22
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Indol-3-butyric acid (IBA) was applied in 0-100 ppm concentrations as a soaking medium of rosemary cuttings for one, three and six hrs or in low (0-20 ppm) concentrations continuously for cuttings rooting. Cuttings number of induced roots and root length and rosmarinic acid, phenolic and alkaloids contents, giving rosemary plant its edible and pharmaceutical importance, were studied. Results revealed that rooting ability of cuttings was improved as a number of induced roots andby time of cutting soaking in the different concentrations of IBA. Optimal root number, which was five times the control value was achieved by soaking cuttings for three hours in 60 ppm IBA. Length and weight of induced roots were significantly varied by both time of soaking and concentration of IBA. Rosemary cuttings length slightly increased (4%) by six hours of soaking in 40 ppm IBA while their leaves areas increased (20%) by one hour of cuttings soaking in 60 ppm IBA. Leaves chlorophyll a, b and carotenoids were not affected significantly by IBA concentrations, while time of soaking was effective in increasing chlorophyll a. Rosmarinic acid was increased (5.6%) by 60 ppm IBA, but soaking in 80 ppm for one and three hours decreased it (32% and 33%). Cutting mortality during transplantation into soil was improved by low concentration of IBA or by short time of Soaking in high IBA concentration. Study preferred soaking cuttings in low concentrations of IBA especially 5 ppm continuously as it was found effective in cuttings rooting and vigor that will insure success of plant growth by such cuttings schema.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA improved rosemary cutting rooting as measured by induced root number with soaking time and concentration.

Taxon
rosemarySalvia rosmarinust0
Treatment
IBAe0
Outcome
number of induced rootse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rooting ability of cuttings was improved as a number of induced roots andby time of cutting soaking in the different concentrations of IBA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–548 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosemary”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soaking cuttings for three hours in 60 ppm IBA produced an optimal root number five times the control.

Taxon
RosemarySalvia rosmarinust0
Treatment
soaking cuttings for three hours in 60 ppm IBAe0
Outcome
root numbere0
Direction
Optimale0
Value
five timese0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Optimal root number, which was five times the control value was achieved by soaking cuttings for three hours in 60 ppm IBA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–672 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosemary”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–74 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Induced root length and weight varied significantly with IBA concentration and soaking duration.

Taxon
RosemarySalvia rosmarinust0
Treatment
concentration of IBAe0
Outcome
Length and weight of induced rootse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Length and weight of induced roots were significantly varied by both time of soaking and concentration of IBA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosemary”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six hours of soaking in 40 ppm IBA slightly increased rosemary cutting length by 4%.

Taxon
RosemarySalvia rosmarinuse0
Treatment
six hours of soaking in 40 ppm IBAe0
Outcome
cuttings lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rosemary cuttings length slightly increased (4%) by six hours of soaking in 40 ppm IBA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–870 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One hour of soaking in 60 ppm IBA increased rosemary leaf area by 20%.

Taxon
RosemarySalvia rosmarinust0
Treatment
one hour of cuttings soaking in 60 ppm IBAe0
Outcome
leaves arease0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their leaves areas increased (20%) by one hour of cuttings soaking in 60 ppm IBA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosemary”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA concentration did not significantly affect leaf chlorophyll a, b or carotenoids.

Taxon
RosemarySalvia rosmarinust0
Treatment
IBA concentrationse0
Outcome
Leaves chlorophyll a, b and carotenoidse0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaves chlorophyll a, b and carotenoids were not affected significantly by IBA concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosemary”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–74 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soaking duration increased leaf chlorophyll a.

Taxon
RosemarySalvia rosmarinust0
Treatment
time of soakinge0
Outcome
chlorophyll ae0
Direction
increasinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“time of soaking was effective in increasing chlorophyll a.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosemary”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

60 ppm IBA increased rosmarinic acid by 5.6%.

Taxon
RosemarySalvia rosmarinust0
Treatment
60 ppm IBAe0
Outcome
Rosmarinic acide0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rosmarinic acid was increased (5.6%) by 60 ppm IBA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosemary”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soaking in 80 ppm IBA for one hour decreased rosmarinic acid by 32%.

Taxon
RosemarySalvia rosmarinust0
Treatment
soaking in 80 ppm for onee0
Outcome
Rosmarinic acide1
Direction
decreasede0
Value
32%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soaking in 80 ppm for one and three hours decreased it (32% and 33%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1244 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rosmarinic acid was increased (5.6%) by 60 ppm IBA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosemary”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soaking in 80 ppm IBA for three hours decreased rosmarinic acid by 33%.

Taxon
RosemarySalvia rosmarinust0
Treatment
80 ppm for one and three hourse0
Outcome
Rosmarinic acide1
Direction
decreasede0
Value
33%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soaking in 80 ppm for one and three hours decreased it (32% and 33%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1244 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rosmarinic acid was increased (5.6%) by 60 ppm IBA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosemary”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low IBA concentration or short soaking in high IBA improved transplant survival of cuttings.

Taxon
RosemarySalvia rosmarinust0
Treatment
low concentration of IBA or by short time of Soaking in high IBA concentratione0
Outcome
Cutting mortality during transplantation into soile0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cutting mortality during transplantation into soil was improved by low concentration of IBA or by short time of Soaking in high IBA concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1391 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosemary”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–74 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The study recommends continuously soaking rosemary cuttings in low IBA concentrations, especially 5 ppm, for rooting and vigor.

Taxon
RosemarySalvia rosmarinust0
Treatment
5 ppm continuouslye0
Outcome
soaking cuttings in low concentrations of IBA especially 5 ppm continuouslye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Study preferred soaking cuttings in low concentrations of IBA especially 5 ppm continuously as it was found effective in cuttings rooting and vigor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1539 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosemary”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–74 · show in text ↑

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Salvia rosmarinus (rosemary)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Salvia rosmarinus (rosemary)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · growth · Salvia rosmarinus (rosemary)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.