Abstract
An experiment was conducted in order to evaluate the effects of Mo spraying on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of wheat grain yield under water stress condition, in Varamin agricultural resspikech center in 2011. A split plot layout within randomized complete block design with three replications was used. Main plots were three irrigation treatments (normal irrigation, non-irrigation at start of grain filling stage and non-irrigation at start of flowering stage) and sub plots were Mo spraying with three levels including spraying with pure water, Mo spraying with 0.5% concentration and Mo spraying with 1% concentration. The result showed that, grain yield and many of yield components affected by drought stress, significantly, on reproductive growth stage. Grain yield had significantly decreased by light and severe stress by 14.6% and 26.7% respectively. The most effect of stress at filling stage treatment were on thousand kernel weight leaf area duration and day to maturity, whereas, number grain per spike and number of fertile spike affected with stress at flowering stage treatment. Severe stress treatment had a significant effect on maximum amount of LAI and CGR. Leaf area duration decreased for both two stress treatments and leaf defoliation started so spikelier than normal treatment. Mo spraying has significant effects on grain yield and many yield components and also caused a significant decrease of water stress damages. 1% concentration of Mo spraying caused significant increase in total kernel weight, pedancle length, number of fertile spike and number of kernel per spike by 6.7%, 13.9%, 5.7%, 6.5% and 17.4% respectively. Day to maturity increased for 4 days in this treatment. Mo spraying with 1% concentration increased the grain yield from 5699 kg ha -1 to 6065 kg ha -1 significantly. There was no significant difference between to spraying concentrations (0.5% and 1%) for number of kernel per spike, total kernel weight, peduncle length, grain yield, biological yield, harvest index, protein yield and protein percentage. Also, the effect of Mo spraying was not significant for biological yield and harvest index. The manner of LAI and CGR changes during wheat growth period had significantly affected by Mo spraying. Protein percentage of wheat grain increased in both two irrigation and Mo spraying treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18
Claim · model-written summary
Light stress reduced grain yield 14.6%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain yield had significantly decreased by light and severe stress by 14.6% and 26.7% respectively.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Severe stress reduced grain yield 26.7%.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- severe stresse0
- Outcome
- Grain yielde0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 26.7%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain yield had significantly decreased by light and severe stress by 14.6% and 26.7% respectively.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Filling-stage stress affected kernel weight, leaf area duration and maturity most.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- stress at filling stagee0
- Outcome
- thousand kernel weight leaf area duration and day to maturitye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The most effect of stress at filling stage treatment were on thousand kernel weight leaf area duration and day to maturity”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Flowering-stage stress affected grains per spike and fertile spike number.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- stress at flowering stagee0
- Outcome
- number grain per spike and number of fertile spikee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“number grain per spike and number of fertile spike affected with stress at flowering stage treatment”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Severe stress significantly affected maximal LAI and CGR.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Severe stress treatmente0
- Outcome
- maximum amount of LAI and CGRe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Severe stress treatment had a significant effect on maximum amount of LAI and CGR.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Both stresses reduced leaf area duration.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- both two stress treatmentse0
- Outcome
- Leaf area duratione0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Comparator
- normal treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Leaf area duration decreased for both two stress treatments and leaf defoliation started so spikelier than normal treatment.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Defoliation began earlier under stress.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- leaf defoliatione0
- Comparator
- normal treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“leaf defoliation started so spikelier than normal treatment”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Molybdenum spraying reduced water-stress damage.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Mo sprayinge0
- Outcome
- water stress damagese0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mo spraying has significant effects on grain yield and many yield components and also caused a significant decrease of water stress damages.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
One percent molybdenum increased total kernel weight.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 1% concentration of Mo sprayinge0
- Outcome
- total kernel weighte0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 6.7%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“1% concentration of Mo spraying caused significant increase in total kernel weight, pedancle length, number of fertile spike and number of kernel per spike by 6.7%, 13.9%, 5.7%, 6.5% and 17.4% respectively.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
One percent molybdenum increased peduncle length.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 1% concentration of Mo sprayinge0
- Outcome
- pedancle lengthe0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 13.9%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“1% concentration of Mo spraying caused significant increase in total kernel weight, pedancle length, number of fertile spike and number of kernel per spike by 6.7%, 13.9%, 5.7%, 6.5% and 17.4% respectively.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
One percent molybdenum increased fertile spike number.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 1% concentration of Mo sprayinge0
- Outcome
- number of fertile spikee0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 5.7%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“1% concentration of Mo spraying caused significant increase in total kernel weight, pedancle length, number of fertile spike and number of kernel per spike by 6.7%, 13.9%, 5.7%, 6.5% and 17.4% respectively.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
One percent molybdenum increased kernels per spike.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 1% concentration of Mo sprayinge0
- Outcome
- number of kernel per spikee0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 6.5%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“1% concentration of Mo spraying caused significant increase in total kernel weight, pedancle length, number of fertile spike and number of kernel per spike by 6.7%, 13.9%, 5.7%, 6.5% and 17.4% respectively.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Maturity was delayed four days under the treatment.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- this treatmente0
- Outcome
- Day to maturitye0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 4 dayse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Day to maturity increased for 4 days in this treatment.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
One percent molybdenum raised grain yield from 5699 to 6065 kg per hectare.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Mo spraying with 1% concentratione0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 6065 kg ha -1e0
- Qualifier
- 5699 kg ha -1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mo spraying with 1% concentration increased the grain yield from 5699 kg ha -1 to 6065 kg ha -1 significantly.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The two molybdenum concentrations did not differ significantly on listed yield and protein traits.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 0.5%e0
- Outcome
- number of kernel per spike, total kernel weight, peduncle length, grain yield, biological yield, harvest index, protein yield and protein percentagee0
- Direction
- no significant differencee0
- Comparator
- 1%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There was no significant difference between to spraying concentrations (0.5% and 1%) for number of kernel per spike, total kernel weight, peduncle length, grain yield, biological yield, harvest index, protein yield and protein percentage.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Molybdenum did not significantly affect biological yield or harvest index.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Mo sprayinge0
- Outcome
- biological yield and harvest indexe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the effect of Mo spraying was not significant for biological yield and harvest index.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Molybdenum significantly altered LAI and CGR trajectories.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Mo sprayinge0
- Outcome
- LAI and CGR changese0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The manner of LAI and CGR changes during wheat growth period had significantly affected by Mo spraying.”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation and molybdenum treatments increased grain protein percentage.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- irrigation and Mo spraying treatmentse0
- Outcome
- Protein percentage of wheat graine0
- Direction
- increasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Protein percentage of wheat grain increased in both two irrigation and Mo spraying treatments.”
t0“Wheat”
The same questions in other papers
molybdenum atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- no effect
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →light · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
64 papers more in this group
See all 68 papers →application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
873 papers more in this group
See all 877 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.