Paper · 2011 · AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY

Efficacy of preharvest spraying with Pichia guilliermondii on postharvest decay and quality of cherry tomato fruit during storage

Zhao Yan; Wang Ruolan; Tu Kang; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
26
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of preharvest spraying with Pichia guilliermondiion postharvest natural decay of cherry tomato fruit, and evaluated the quality attributes during storage. Preharvest spraying with P. guilliermondii significantlydecreased the decay index. Moreover, the efficacy of this biological control was positively correlated with spraying frequency. However, preharvest spraying with P. guilliermondii and spraying frequency did not significantly affect fruit quality attributes regardless of whether the cherry tomato fruit was grown or stored after harvest. This observation indicates that preharvest spraying with P. guilliermondiidoes not influence the quality attributes of the fruit. In addition, the activities of peroxidase (POD), phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), and β-1,3-glucanase increased in all P. guilliermondii treatments, suggesting a positive correlation with spraying frequency. The results suggest that cherry tomato fruit is capable of responding to preharvest spraying with P. guilliermondii, which can activate its defensive enzymes and thus induce host disease resistance. Key words: Preharvest, Pichia guilliermondii, cherry tomato fruit, decay, quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Preharvest Pichia spraying significantly decreased fruit decay index.

Treatment
Preharvest spraying with P. guilliermondiie0
Interactor
P. guilliermondiie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
decay indexe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cherry tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–114 · show in text ↑
e0

“Preharvest spraying with P. guilliermondii significantlydecreased the decay index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–273 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biocontrol efficacy increased with spraying frequency.

Treatment
spraying frequencye0
Outcome
efficacy of this biological controle0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cherry tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–114 · show in text ↑
e0

“the efficacy of this biological control was positively correlated with spraying frequency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–374 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Preharvest Pichia spraying did not significantly affect fruit quality attributes.

Treatment
preharvest spraying with P. guilliermondiie0
Interactor
P. guilliermondiie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
fruit quality attributese0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cherry tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–114 · show in text ↑
e0

“preharvest spraying with P. guilliermondii and spraying frequency did not significantly affect fruit quality attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–503 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying frequency did not significantly affect fruit quality attributes.

Treatment
spraying frequencye0
Outcome
fruit quality attributese0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cherry tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–114 · show in text ↑
e0

“preharvest spraying with P. guilliermondii and spraying frequency did not significantly affect fruit quality attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pichia treatments increased peroxidase, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and β-1,3-glucanase activity.

Treatment
P. guilliermondii treatmentse0
Interactor
P. guilliermondiie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
activities of peroxidase (POD), phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), and β-1,3-glucanasee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cherry tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–114 · show in text ↑
e0

“the activities of peroxidase (POD), phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), and β-1,3-glucanase increased in all P. guilliermondii treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–864 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defense enzyme activity was positively correlated with spraying frequency.

Treatment
spraying frequencye0
Outcome
positive correlatione0
Direction
positive correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cherry tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–114 · show in text ↑
e0

“suggesting a positive correlation with spraying frequency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–924 · show in text ↑

application · quality: grain · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 24 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

application · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

150 papers: 134 positive, 16 negative or no effect

133 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

146 papers more in this group

See all 150 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.