application · Quality: grain · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)
29 claims from these papers.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
None of these papers cites another one here.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 24
Influence of biostimulants on yield and quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) · 2000
- positive
Effect of Foliar Fertilization on Product Indicators of Tomato Grown in the Open Field · 2012
- positive
Tomato fruit quality as influenced by salinity and nitric oxide · 2013
- positive
Effects of Dipping Flowers and Spraying Micro Elements on Leaves on Development of Tomato Fruits · 2013
- positive
- positive
Response of Tomato Plants to Foliar Application of Humic, Fulvic Acid and Chelated Calcium · 2016
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Exogenous Calcium on Calcium Accumulation, Uptake and Utilization in Tomato · 2025
- positive
Nanoselenium application improves post‐harvest fruit quality and disease resistance in tomato · 2025
- positive
- positive
Design of the double-layer spray greenhouse spray system and its cooling effects · 2025
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 5
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.