Abstract
Enhancing fruit quality through the application of contemporary agrochemicals that regulate physiological and biochemical processes in plants is a pressing concern in present circumstances. The effect of foliar application of 04 agrochemicals (Agricola, Aminofol, Aminovit, Speefol) on the quality of 04 plum-shaped tomato varieties (Cobra26F1, Heinz3402F1, SisterF1, Rio Grande) cultivated on light chestnut soils under drip irrigation was carry out in the north of the Astrakhan region within a strongly continental climate zone from 2018 to 2020. The study revealed that varying agrochemicals have an impact on the quality parameters of tomato fruit. In the Cobra 26 F1 hybrid, foliar treatments led to a rise in the fruit's dry matter content, from 0.24% in the aminofol variant to 0.49% in the Agricola variant. Additionally, sugar content increased by 0.20-0.23% in the Agricola treatments and by 0.06-0.33% in the Aminovit treatments, for both the Cobra 26 F1 and Sister F1 hybrids. Application of various agrochemicals on leaves resulted in an increased mass fraction of vitamin C in Heinz 3402 F1 hybrids, specifically on variants treated with Aminovit and Agricola by 2.21 and 3.81 mg/100 g respectively. For hybrid Sister F1, only the variant treated with Agricola showed an increase of 1.79 mg/100g. In the case of variety Rio Grande, all variants showed an increase in vitamin C, ranging from 0.03 on the Aminovit-treated variant to 8.84 on the Aminofol-treated variant. The fruit of both the Heinz 3402 F1 hybrid and the Rio Grande variety exhibited an increase in carotene content, from 0.10 to 0.24 mg% and 0.02 to 0.04 mg%, respectively. Additionally, fruit acidity was reduced. As a conclusion the applied agrochemicals have different effects on the content of dry matter.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar treatments raised dry matter in Cobra 26 F1 fruit by 0.24% with Aminofol and 0.49% with Agricola.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Material
- Cobra 26 F1e0
- Treatment
- foliar treatmentse0
- Outcome
- dry matter contente0
- Direction
- risee0
- Value
- 0.24%e0
- Qualifier
- 0.49% in the Agricola variante0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the Cobra 26 F1 hybrid, foliar treatments led to a rise in the fruit's dry matter content, from 0.24% in the aminofol variant to 0.49% in the Agricola variant”
t0“Tomato’s Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Agricola raised sugar content by 0.20–0.23% in Cobra 26 F1 and Sister F1 fruit.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Material
- Cobra 26 F1 and Sister F1e0
- Treatment
- Agricola treatmentse0
- Outcome
- sugar contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 0.20-0.23%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sugar content increased by 0.20-0.23% in the Agricola treatments and by 0.06-0.33% in the Aminovit treatments, for both the Cobra 26 F1 and Sister F1 hybrids”
t0“Tomato’s Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Aminovit raised sugar content by 0.06–0.33% in Cobra 26 F1 and Sister F1 fruit.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Material
- Cobra 26 F1 and Sister F1e0
- Treatment
- Aminovit treatmentse0
- Outcome
- sugar contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 0.06-0.33%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sugar content increased by 0.20-0.23% in the Agricola treatments and by 0.06-0.33% in the Aminovit treatments, for both the Cobra 26 F1 and Sister F1 hybrids”
t0“Tomato’s Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Aminovit increased vitamin C in Heinz 3402 F1 fruit by 2.21 mg/100 g.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Material
- Heinz 3402 F1e0
- Treatment
- Aminovite0
- Outcome
- mass fraction of vitamin Ce0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 2.21e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increased mass fraction of vitamin C in Heinz 3402 F1 hybrids, specifically on variants treated with Aminovit and Agricola by 2.21 and 3.81 mg/100 g respectively”
t0“Tomato’s Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Agricola increased vitamin C in Heinz 3402 F1 fruit by 3.81 mg/100 g.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Material
- Heinz 3402 F1e0
- Treatment
- Agricolae0
- Outcome
- mass fraction of vitamin Ce0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 3.81 mg/100 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increased mass fraction of vitamin C in Heinz 3402 F1 hybrids, specifically on variants treated with Aminovit and Agricola by 2.21 and 3.81 mg/100 g respectively”
t0“Tomato’s Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Agricola increased vitamin C in Sister F1 fruit by 1.79 mg/100g.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Material
- Sister F1e0
- Treatment
- Agricolae0
- Outcome
- vitamin Ce0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 1.79 mg/100ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of various agrochemicals on leaves resulted in an increased mass fraction of vitamin C in Heinz 3402 F1 hybrids, specifically on variants treated with Aminovit and Agricola by 2.21 and 3.81 mg/100 g respectively. For hybrid Sister F1, only the variant treated with Agricola showed an increase of 1.79 mg/100g”
t0“Tomato’s Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
All treatments increased vitamin C in Rio Grande fruit, ranging from 0.03 with Aminovit to 8.84 with Aminofol.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Material
- Rio Grandee0
- Treatment
- all variantse0
- Outcome
- vitamin Ce0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 0.03e0
- Qualifier
- 8.84 on the Aminofol-treated variante0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the case of variety Rio Grande, all variants showed an increase in vitamin C, ranging from 0.03 on the Aminovit-treated variant to 8.84 on the Aminofol-treated variant”
t0“Tomato’s Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Carotene content increased from 0.10 to 0.24 mg% in Heinz 3402 F1 fruit.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Material
- Heinz 3402 F1e0
- Outcome
- carotene contente0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 0.10 to 0.24 mg%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The fruit of both the Heinz 3402 F1 hybrid and the Rio Grande variety exhibited an increase in carotene content, from 0.10 to 0.24 mg% and 0.02 to 0.04 mg%, respectively”
t0“Tomato’s Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Carotene content increased from 0.02 to 0.04 mg% in Rio Grande fruit.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Material
- Rio Grandee0
- Outcome
- carotene contente0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 0.02 to 0.04 mg%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The fruit of both the Heinz 3402 F1 hybrid and the Rio Grande variety exhibited an increase in carotene content, from 0.10 to 0.24 mg% and 0.02 to 0.04 mg%, respectively”
t0“Tomato’s Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Tomato fruit acidity was reduced.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Outcome
- fruit aciditye0
- Direction
- reducede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Additionally, fruit acidity was reduced”
t0“Tomato’s Cultivars”
The same questions in other papers
application · quality: grain · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
25 papers more in this group
See all 29 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.