Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Weekly nutrient injection schedule had no significant effect on fruit quality or elemental concentration.

A claim from External and Internal Blotchy Ripening and Fruit Elemental Content of Trickle-irrigated Tomatoes as Affected by N and K Application Time · 1990

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weekly nutrient injection schedule had no significant effect on fruit quality or elemental concentration.

Treatment
weekly schedule of nutrient injectione0
Outcome
fruit quality or fruit elemental concentratione0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The weekly schedule of nutrient injection had no significant effect on fruit quality or fruit elemental concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1340
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–96

Title

External and Internal Blotchy Ripening and Fruit Elemental Content of Trickle-irrigated Tomatoes as Affected by N and K Application Time

James M. Dangler; Salvadore J. Locascio Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1990. doi:10.21273/jashs.115.4.547

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-81d7f53e80dead7aa590a0275809969f38b3a820ed918aaad152fb7cd7f24a5f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 18 in the model’s answer

application · quality: grain · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 24 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.