Paper · 2009 · African Journal of Microbiology Research

Effects of Rhizobium inoculation, lime and molybdenum on photosynthesis and chlorophyll content of Phaseolus vulgaris L.

Sylvie Bambara; Patrick Alois Ndakidemi

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
22
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effects of Rhizobium inoculation, lime and molybdenum on photosynthesis and chlorophyll content of Phaseolus vulgaris L. were investigated in a split-split plot design in a greenhouse and field experiment. Results showed that R. inoculation, molybdenum and lime had significant effects on the leaf chlorophyll content (Chl), the photosynthesis (A), the intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) and the transpiration rate (E) of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Application of Mo and lime at the highest rates (12 g of Mo per kg seed and 3 t lime ha-1 respectively) was significantly superior to the control and the 6 g of Mo per kg seed and 2 t lime ha-1. The combination of these supplies at different levels resulted in significant interactions between some parameters suggesting that successful bean production in these acidic soils is unlikely unless attention is paid to supply these important nutrients in the study area. Key words: Intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), transpiration (E), interaction.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation had significant effects on leaf chlorophyll content and photosynthesis of Phaseolus vulgaris.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
R. inoculatione0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiumt1symbiont
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll content (Chl), the photosynthesis (A)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“R. inoculation, molybdenum and lime had significant effects on the leaf chlorophyll content (Chl), the photosynthesis (A), the intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) and the transpiration rate (E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–424 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rhizobium inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation had significant effects on intercellular CO2 concentration and transpiration rate of Phaseolus vulgaris.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
R. inoculatione0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiumt1symbiont
Outcome
the intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) and the transpiration rate (E)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“R. inoculation, molybdenum and lime had significant effects on the leaf chlorophyll content (Chl), the photosynthesis (A), the intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) and the transpiration rate (E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–424 · show in text ↑
t1

“Rhizobium inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Molybdenum had significant effects on leaf chlorophyll content and photosynthesis of Phaseolus vulgaris.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
molybdenume0
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll content (Chl), the photosynthesis (A)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“R. inoculation, molybdenum and lime had significant effects on the leaf chlorophyll content (Chl), the photosynthesis (A), the intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) and the transpiration rate (E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Molybdenum had significant effects on intercellular CO2 concentration and transpiration rate of Phaseolus vulgaris.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
molybdenume0
Outcome
the intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) and the transpiration rate (E)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“R. inoculation, molybdenum and lime had significant effects on the leaf chlorophyll content (Chl), the photosynthesis (A), the intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) and the transpiration rate (E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime had significant effects on leaf chlorophyll content and photosynthesis of Phaseolus vulgaris.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
limee0
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll content (Chl), the photosynthesis (A)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“R. inoculation, molybdenum and lime had significant effects on the leaf chlorophyll content (Chl), the photosynthesis (A), the intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) and the transpiration rate (E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime had significant effects on intercellular CO2 concentration and transpiration rate of Phaseolus vulgaris.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
limee0
Outcome
the intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) and the transpiration rate (E)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“R. inoculation, molybdenum and lime had significant effects on the leaf chlorophyll content (Chl), the photosynthesis (A), the intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) and the transpiration rate (E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mo applied at 12 g per kg seed was significantly superior to the control and to 6 g of Mo per kg seed.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
12 g of Mo per kg seede0
Outcome
significantly superiore0
Direction
significantly superiore0
Comparator
the control and the 6 g of Mo per kg seede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of Mo and lime at the highest rates (12 g of Mo per kg seed and 3 t lime ha-1 respectively) was significantly superior to the control and the 6 g of Mo per kg seed and 2 t lime ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime applied at 3 t per ha was significantly superior to the control and to 2 t per ha.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
3 t lime ha-1e0
Outcome
significantly superiore0
Direction
significantly superiore0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of Mo and lime at the highest rates (12 g of Mo per kg seed and 3 t lime ha-1 respectively) was significantly superior to the control and the 6 g of Mo per kg seed and 2 t lime ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining Rhizobium inoculation, Mo and lime at different levels produced significant interactions between some parameters.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Phaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
combination of these supplies at different levelse0
Outcome
interactions between some parameterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Phaseolus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“The combination of these supplies at different levels resulted in significant interactions between some parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–759 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Successful bean production in these acidic soils is unlikely unless these nutrients are supplied.

Taxon
beane0
Outcome
supply these important nutrientse0
Setting
acidic soilse0

Verbatim

e0

“successful bean production in these acidic soils is unlikely unless attention is paid to supply these important nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–897 · show in text ↑

molybdenum atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

lime · physiology: gas exchange · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · Rhizobium · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 16 positive, 7 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.