Paper · 1991 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Effects of Anoxia on Wheat Seedlings

I. WATERS; P. J. C. KUIPER; E. WATKIN; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
63
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Anoxia was imposed on 4–6-d-old, intact wheat seedlings, after the roots had first been exposed for 1 d to O2 concentrations between 0·016 and 0·06 mol m−3. Apices of the main axis of the seminal roots were considered to have tolerated anoxia if elongation occurred after return from anoxia to air, hereafter called ‘retention of elongation potential’. During anoxia, elongation potential was retained longer in roots of intact seedlings than in 0–5 mm excised root tips supplied with 50 mol m−3 glucose. In intact seedlings, elongation potential was retained longer at 15°C than at 25°C, and at pH 50 and 60 than at pH 40. These differences between treatments were maintained in the presence of exogenous glucose, and glucose supply prolonged the retention of elongation potential in all anoxic treatments. Elongation potential was retained much longer at very low 02 concentrations (0006 to 00l mol m−3) than under anoxia; this was established at pH 40. Anoxia inhibited the transport of sugars from the shoots and/or endosperm to the root by 79-97%, as assessed from experiments with roots of intact plants exposed to anoxia at pH 60 and 15 °C. Overall, the results demonstrate: (i) that the occurrence of adverse effects of anoxia during waterlogging in the field may interact with other environmental factors and (ii) that there are pronounced difficulties integrating data on tolerance to anoxia obtained in different laboratories.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root elongation potential persisted longer in intact wheat seedlings than excised tips during anoxia.

Treatment
intact seedlingse0
Outcome
elongation potentiale0
Direction
retained longere0
Qualifier
During anoxiae0
Comparator
0–5 mm excised root tipse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“During anoxia, elongation potential was retained longer in roots of intact seedlings than in 0–5 mm excised root tips supplied with 50 mol m−3 glucose.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat root elongation potential persisted longer at 15°C than 25°C.

Treatment
15°Ce0
Outcome
elongation potentiale0
Direction
retained longere0
Comparator
25°Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“In intact seedlings, elongation potential was retained longer at 15°C than at 25°C, and at pH 50 and 60 than at pH 40.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–623 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat root elongation potential persisted longer at pH 50 and 60 than pH 40.

Treatment
pH 50 and 60e0
Outcome
elongation potentiale0
Direction
retained longere0
Comparator
pH 40e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“In intact seedlings, elongation potential was retained longer at 15°C than at 25°C, and at pH 50 and 60 than at pH 40.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–623 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The temperature and pH differences persisted with exogenous glucose.

Outcome
differences between treatments were maintainede0
Qualifier
presence of exogenous glucosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“These differences between treatments were maintained in the presence of exogenous glucose, and glucose supply prolonged the retention of elongation potential in all anoxic treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glucose prolonged wheat root elongation potential under all anoxic treatments.

Treatment
glucose supplye0
Outcome
retention of elongation potentiale0
Direction
prolongede0
Qualifier
all anoxic treatmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“glucose supply prolonged the retention of elongation potential in all anoxic treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Very low oxygen allowed longer elongation potential retention than anoxia at pH 40.

Treatment
very low 02 concentrations (0006 to 00l mol m−3)e0
Outcome
Elongation potentiale0
Direction
retained much longere0
Qualifier
pH 40e0
Comparator
anoxiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“Elongation potential was retained much longer at very low 02 concentrations (0006 to 00l mol m−3) than under anoxia; this was established at pH 40.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–955 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anoxia inhibited sugar transport from shoot or endosperm to wheat root by 79-97%.

Treatment
Anoxiae0
Outcome
transport of sugars from the shoots and/or endosperm to the roote0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
79-97%e0
Qualifier
pH 60 and 15 °Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“Anoxia inhibited the transport of sugars from the shoots and/or endosperm to the root by 79-97%, as assessed from experiments with roots of intact plants exposed to anoxia at pH 60 and 15 °C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1147 · show in text ↑

glucose · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

ph · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 6 positive, 24 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.