Paper · 1995 · HortScience

Benzyladenine Effects on Cell Division and Cell Size during Apple Fruit Thinning

Paul T. Wismer; J.T.A. Proctor; D.C. Elfving

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · public-domain

Abstract

Benzyladenine (BA), carbaryl (CB), daminozide (DM), and naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) were applied postbloom, as fruitlet thinning agents, to mature `Empire' apple trees. Although fruit set and yield were similar for BA, NAA, and CB, BA-treated fruit were larger, indicating BA increased fruit size beyond the effect attributable to thinning. BA applied at 100 mg·liter –1 increased the rate of cell layer formation in the fruit cortex, indicating that BA stimulated cortical cell division. The maximum rate of cell division occurred 10 to 14 days after full bloom (DAFB) when fruit relative growth rate and density reached a maximum and percent dry weight reached a minimum. Cell size in BA-treated fruit was similar to the control. Cell division ended by 35 DAFB in the control and BA-treated fruit when percent dry weight and dry weight began to increase rapidly and fruit density changed from a rapid to a slower rate of decreased density. These data support the hypothesis that BA-induced fruit size increases in `Empire' apple result largely from greater numbers of cells in the fruit cortex, whereas the fruit size increase due to NAA or CB is a consequence of larger cell size.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed public-domain. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benzyladenine increased apple fruit size beyond the effect of thinning.

Treatment
BAe1
Outcome
fruit sizee1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Fruit Thinning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“Although fruit set and yield were similar for BA, NAA, and CB, BA-treated fruit were larger, indicating BA increased fruit size beyond the effect attributable to thinning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–340 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benzyladenine gave fruit set and yield similar to NAA and CB.

Treatment
BAe1
Outcome
fruit set and yielde1
Direction
similare1
Comparator
NAA, and CBe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Fruit Thinning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“Although fruit set and yield were similar for BA, NAA, and CB, BA-treated fruit were larger, indicating BA increased fruit size beyond the effect attributable to thinning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–340 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BA at 100 mg·liter–1 increased the rate of cell layer formation in the fruit cortex.

Treatment
BA applied at 100 mg·liter –1e3
Outcome
rate of cell layer formation in the fruit cortexe3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Fruit Thinning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–80 · show in text ↑
e3

“BA applied at 100 mg·liter –1 increased the rate of cell layer formation in the fruit cortex”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–434 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum rate of cell division in apple fruit occurred 10 to 14 days after full bloom.

Outcome
maximum rate of cell divisione4
Value
10 to 14 days after full bloom (DAFB)e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Fruit Thinning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–80 · show in text ↑
e4

“The maximum rate of cell division occurred 10 to 14 days after full bloom (DAFB)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–570 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cell size in BA-treated fruit was similar to the control.

Treatment
BAe5
Outcome
cell sizee5
Direction
similare5
Comparator
the controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Fruit Thinning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–80 · show in text ↑
e5

“Cell size in BA-treated fruit was similar to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–731 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cell division ended by 35 DAFB in control and BA-treated fruit.

Outcome
cell divisione6
Value
35 DAFBe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Fruit Thinning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–80 · show in text ↑
e6

“Cell division ended by 35 DAFB in the control and BA-treated fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–799 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BA-induced fruit size increase results largely from greater numbers of cortical cells rather than larger cells.

Treatment
BAe7
Outcome
fruit size increasese7
Qualifier
greater numbers of cells in the fruit cortexe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Fruit Thinning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–80 · show in text ↑
e7

“These data support the hypothesis that BA-induced fruit size increases in”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1016 · show in text ↑
e2

“result largely from greater numbers of cells in the fruit cortex, whereas the fruit size increase due to NAA or CB is a consequence of larger cell size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1183 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit size increase due to NAA or CB is a consequence of larger cell size.

Treatment
NAA or CBe1
Outcome
fruit size increasee1
Qualifier
larger cell sizee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Fruit Thinning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“result largely from greater numbers of cells in the fruit cortex, whereas the fruit size increase due to NAA or CB is a consequence of larger cell size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1183 · show in text ↑

N-benzyladenine · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

75 papers: 57 positive, 18 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.