Paper · 2014 · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Intercropping different varieties of radish can increase cadmium accumulation in radish

Lijin Lin; Qihua Liu; Jun Shi; et al.

9
claims
10
verbatim quotes
48
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Genetic diversity has supplied effective ways to improve crop yields and disease resistance. Therefore, crop uptake of heavy metals may be reduced by collecting germplasm resources. In the present study, cadmium accumulation and nutrients in radish were investigated by intercropping 3 genotypes (red, green, and white radish) in different combinations. Both pot and field experiments showed that cadmium content in radish was increased by intercropping 2 or 3 genotypes, except when white radish was intercropped with green radish. The biomass of red radish was improved by a mixture of all 3 genotypes, green radish biomass was improved by intercropping with the other 2 varieties, and white radish biomass was improved by intercropping with red radish in both pot and field experiments. The pot experiment indicated that the soil exchangeable cadmium concentration of red radish grown with green radish was lower than that of monoculture, whereas red radish intercropped with white radish was between the respective monocultures; the soil exchangeable cadmium concentrations of green radish grown with white radish and with all 3 genotypes grown together were greater than those of the monocultures. Some intercropping modes also improved potassium and phosphorus contents in the edible parts of radish in the pot experiment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two- or three-genotype intercropping increased radish cadmium content except the white–green pairing.

Treatment
intercropping 2 or 3 genotypese0
Outcome
cadmium contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
except when white radish was intercropped with green radishe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cadmium content in radish was increased by intercropping 2 or 3 genotypes, except when white radish was intercropped with green radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–531 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixing all three genotypes improved red radish biomass.

Taxon
red radishe0
Material
red radishe0
Treatment
a mixture of all 3 genotypese0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The biomass of red radish was improved by a mixture of all 3 genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping green radish with the other two varieties improved its biomass.

Taxon
green radishe0
Material
green radishe0
Treatment
intercropping with the other 2 varietiese0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“green radish biomass was improved by intercropping with the other 2 varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–682 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping white radish with red radish improved white radish biomass.

Taxon
white radishe0
Material
white radishe0
Treatment
intercropping with red radishe0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“white radish biomass was improved by intercropping with red radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–754 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil exchangeable cadmium was lower for red radish with green radish than in monoculture.

Taxon
red radishe0
Treatment
grown with green radishe0
Outcome
soil exchangeable cadmium concentratione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
monoculturee0

Verbatim

e0

“the soil exchangeable cadmium concentration of red radish grown with green radish was lower than that of monoculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–940 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil exchangeable cadmium for red radish with white radish lay between the monocultures.

Taxon
red radishe0
Treatment
intercropped with white radishe0
Outcome
red radish intercropped with white radishe0
Direction
betweene0
Comparator
respective monoculturese0

Verbatim

e0

“red radish intercropped with white radish was between the respective monocultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1031 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil exchangeable cadmium was greater for green radish grown with white radish than in monocultures.

Taxon
green radishe0
Treatment
grown with white radishe0
Outcome
soil exchangeable cadmium concentrationse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
monoculturese0

Verbatim

e0

“the soil exchangeable cadmium concentrations of green radish grown with white radish and with all 3 genotypes grown together were greater than those of the monocultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil exchangeable cadmium was greater for all three genotypes together than in monocultures.

Treatment
all 3 genotypes grown togethere0
Outcome
soil exchangeable cadmium concentrationse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
monoculturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soil exchangeable cadmium concentrations of green radish grown with white radish and with all 3 genotypes grown together were greater than those of the monocultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1201 · show in text ↑
t0

“Intercropping different varieties of radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some intercropping modes improved potassium and phosphorus content in edible radish parts.

Organ / stage
edible partse0
Treatment
Some intercropping modese0
Outcome
potassium and phosphorus contentse0
Direction
improvede0
Setting
pot experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Some intercropping modes also improved potassium and phosphorus contents in the edible parts of radish in the pot experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1327 · show in text ↑

intercropping · molecular: metabolites · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

intercropping · nutrient: content · Raphanus sativus (radish)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.