Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Phytoremediation

Effects of intercropping on Se accumulation and growth of pakchoi, lettuce and radish

Wen Tang; Wanjia Tang; Yongdong Xie; et al.

15
claims
24
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Selenium is one of the most basic trace elements in the human body. It is necessary to improve the selenium content in agricultural products through agricultural planting technology to ensure that human nutrition and health need selenium. Therefore, our research passed the effect of intercropping on the growth and selenium accumulation of pakchoi, lettuce and radish were studied through pot experiments to determine whether intercropping of the three crop species can improve their selenium accumulation ability. The results showed that intercropping increased the root and shoot biomass of pakchoi and radish compared with the monocultures, while the biomass of roots and shoots decreased in other intercropping combinations. Intercropping also affected the photosynthetic pigment content of the three crop species. Specifically, the photosynthetic pigments increased in pakchoi and decreased in radish after intercropping. Notably, intercropping the three crop species together increased the SOD (superoxide dismutase) activities of the three crops compared with the monocultures. Meanwhile, intercropping radish with lettuce significantly increased the activities of SOD and CAT (catalase) in radish. Intercropping also increased the soluble sugar content in pakchoi and soluble protein content of radish relative to the monocultures. Furthermore, intercropping decreased the selenium content and the bioconcentration factor of the roots of the three vegetable crops, but improved the shoot selenium content, the bioconcentration factor and the transport factor of Se in pakchoi and radish. In conclusion, intercropping combination of pakchoi and radish can improve selenium accumulation in the edible parts of the crops, which is significant for efficient production of selenium-enriched vegetables.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased root and shoot biomass of pakchoi.

Taxon
pakchoie0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
root and shoot biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
monoculturese0

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping increased the root and shoot biomass of pakchoi and radish compared with the monocultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased root and shoot biomass of radish.

Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
root and shoot biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
monoculturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping increased the root and shoot biomass of pakchoi and radish compared with the monocultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other intercropping combinations reduced root and shoot biomass.

Taxon
pakchoi, lettuce and radisht0
Treatment
other intercropping combinationse0
Outcome
biomass of roots and shootse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the biomass of roots and shoots decreased in other intercropping combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–728 · show in text ↑
t0

“pakchoi, lettuce and radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased photosynthetic pigments in pakchoi.

Taxon
pakchoie0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
photosynthetic pigmentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the photosynthetic pigments increased in pakchoi and decreased in radish after intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–926 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping decreased photosynthetic pigments in radish.

Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
photosynthetic pigmentse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the photosynthetic pigments increased in pakchoi and decreased in radish after intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–926 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-species intercropping increased SOD activity in pakchoi.

Taxon
pakchoit0
Treatment
intercropping the three crop species togethere0
Outcome
SOD (superoxide dismutase) activitiese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
monoculturese0

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping the three crop species together increased the SOD (superoxide dismutase) activities of the three crops compared with the monocultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“pakchoi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-species intercropping increased SOD activity in lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
intercropping the three crop species togethere0
Outcome
SOD (superoxide dismutase) activitiese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
monoculturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping the three crop species together increased the SOD (superoxide dismutase) activities of the three crops compared with the monocultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-species intercropping increased SOD activity in radish.

Treatment
intercropping the three crop species togethere0
Outcome
SOD (superoxide dismutase) activitiese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
monoculturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping the three crop species together increased the SOD (superoxide dismutase) activities of the three crops compared with the monocultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Radish–lettuce intercropping significantly increased radish SOD and CAT activities.

Treatment
intercropping radish with lettucee0
Outcome
activities of SOD and CAT (catalase)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping radish with lettuce significantly increased the activities of SOD and CAT (catalase) in radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased soluble sugar in pakchoi.

Taxon
pakchoie0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
soluble sugar contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
monoculturese0

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping also increased the soluble sugar content in pakchoi and soluble protein content of radish relative to the monocultures”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1207–1339 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased soluble protein in radish.

Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
soluble protein contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
monoculturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping also increased the soluble sugar content in pakchoi and soluble protein content of radish relative to the monocultures”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1207–1339 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced root selenium content and bioconcentration factor across all three crops.

Taxon
pakchoi, lettuce and radisht0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
selenium content and the bioconcentration factore0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping decreased the selenium content and the bioconcentration factor of the roots of the three vegetable crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1472 · show in text ↑
t0

“pakchoi, lettuce and radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping raised shoot selenium content, bioconcentration factor, and transport factor in pakchoi.

Taxon
pakchoit0
Treatment
intercroppinge1
Outcome
shoot selenium content, the bioconcentration factor and the transport factor of See0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“improved the shoot selenium content, the bioconcentration factor and the transport factor of Se in pakchoi and radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1595 · show in text ↑
t0

“pakchoi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“intercropping increased the root and shoot biomass of pakchoi and radish compared with the monocultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping raised shoot selenium content, bioconcentration factor, and transport factor in radish.

Treatment
intercroppinge1
Outcome
shoot selenium content, the bioconcentration factor and the transport factor of See0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved the shoot selenium content, the bioconcentration factor and the transport factor of Se in pakchoi and radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1595 · show in text ↑
t0

“radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“intercropping increased the root and shoot biomass of pakchoi and radish compared with the monocultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–643 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude pakchoi–radish intercropping can improve edible-part selenium accumulation.

Taxon
pakchoi and radishe0
Outcome
improve selenium accumulation in the edible parts of the cropse0

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping combination of pakchoi and radish can improve selenium accumulation in the edible parts of the crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1612–1726 · show in text ↑

intercropping · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

intercropping · nutrient: content · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

intercropping · growth · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

intercropping · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

intercropping · nutrient: content · Raphanus sativus (radish)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

intercropping · physiology: osmolytes · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.