Abstract

The aim of this research was to determine the effect of cold stress on chlorophyll content, proline accumulation and the cell membrane stability of 15 bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at two stage of growth (2 leaf stage and 4 leaf stage). Experiment was carried out in complete block design with tree replications at year 2009 in west Azerbaijan Agriculture science and research center laboratory. 15 cultivar (five genotypes with types winters names Sayson, Martin, Gaskoghen, C-82-12, C-81-14, 5 genotype with type intermediate including Alvand, Mahdavi, Zarrin, Marvdasht, Toos and five genotypes with type spring names Shiraz, Pishtaz, M-79-7, M-81-13 and Kavir) were sown in lab condition . According to the results, cold stress had a significant effect on chlorophyll a and b, total chlorophyll, prolin content and cell membrane stability. At the other hand variety and growing stage have significant effect on treats (P>0.01). The result showed that the M-81-13 with 53.05 mΩ EC has the highest cell membrane stability and the lowest EC was obtaining from gaskoghen with 18.987 mΩ. Also M-79-7 with 2.315 mg chlorophyll a per 1 g leaf fresh weight has highest chlorophyll content. It was determining the ratio of maximal chlorophyll content after cold stress is reliable and a method to determine the frost hardness of wheat variety. The proline content of the leaf however increased in both growth stages in all variety of wheat. Gaskoghen with 0.340 (μg/0.5 g dwt) in 2 leaf growing stage had the highest rate of proline amino acid and Marvdasht variety from inter mediate type in 4 leaf growing stage with 0.003 (μg/0.5 g dwt) had the lowest rate of proline. Key words: Wheat variety, chlorophyll content and proline.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold stress significantly affected chlorophyll a and b, total chlorophyll, proline and membrane stability.

Treatment
cold stresse0
Outcome
chlorophyll a and b, total chlorophyll, prolin content and cell membrane stabilitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cold stress had a significant effect on chlorophyll a and b, total chlorophyll, prolin content and cell membrane stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of cold stress on cell membrane stability, chlorophyll a and b contain and proline accumulation in wheat (Triticum aiestivum L.) variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety and growth stage significantly affected the studied traits.

Material
varietye0
Organ / stage
growing stagee0
Outcome
treatse0
Value
P>0.01e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variety and growing stage have significant effect on treats (P>0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–935 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of cold stress on cell membrane stability, chlorophyll a and b contain and proline accumulation in wheat (Triticum aiestivum L.) variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M-81-13 had the highest cell membrane stability, with 53.05 mΩ EC.

Material
M-81-13e0
Outcome
cell membrane stabilitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
53.05 mΩe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M-81-13 with 53.05 mΩ EC has the highest cell membrane stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1028 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of cold stress on cell membrane stability, chlorophyll a and b contain and proline accumulation in wheat (Triticum aiestivum L.) variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gaskoghen had the lowest EC, 18.987 mΩ.

Material
gaskoghene0
Outcome
ECe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
18.987 mΩe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest EC was obtaining from gaskoghen with 18.987 mΩ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1090 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of cold stress on cell membrane stability, chlorophyll a and b contain and proline accumulation in wheat (Triticum aiestivum L.) variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M-79-7 had the highest chlorophyll a content, 2.315 mg per 1 g leaf fresh weight.

Material
M-79-7e0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.315 mg chlorophyll a per 1 g leaf fresh weighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M-79-7 with 2.315 mg chlorophyll a per 1 g leaf fresh weight has highest chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1189 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of cold stress on cell membrane stability, chlorophyll a and b contain and proline accumulation in wheat (Triticum aiestivum L.) variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximal chlorophyll ratio after cold stress was judged a reliable frost-hardiness measure.

Outcome
frost hardnesse0
Qualifier
reliablee0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ratio of maximal chlorophyll content after cold stress is reliable and a method to determine the frost hardness of wheat variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf proline increased after cold stress at both growth stages in all wheat varieties.

Organ / stage
both growth stagese0
Treatment
cold stresst0
Outcome
proline content of the leafe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The proline content of the leaf however increased in both growth stages in all variety of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1439 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of cold stress on cell membrane stability, chlorophyll a and b contain and proline accumulation in wheat (Triticum aiestivum L.) variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gaskoghen had the highest proline at the 2 leaf stage, 0.340 μg/0.5 g dwt.

Material
Gaskoghene0
Organ / stage
2 leaf growing stagee0
Outcome
rate of proline amino acide0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.340 (μg/0.5 g dwt)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gaskoghen with 0.340 (μg/0.5 g dwt) in 2 leaf growing stage had the highest rate of proline amino acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1543 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of cold stress on cell membrane stability, chlorophyll a and b contain and proline accumulation in wheat (Triticum aiestivum L.) variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marvdasht had the lowest proline at the 4 leaf stage, 0.003 μg/0.5 g dwt.

Material
Marvdashte0
Organ / stage
4 leaf growing stagee0
Outcome
rate of prolinee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
0.003 (μg/0.5 g dwt)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Marvdasht variety from inter mediate type in 4 leaf growing stage with 0.003 (μg/0.5 g dwt) had the lowest rate of proline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1670 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of cold stress on cell membrane stability, chlorophyll a and b contain and proline accumulation in wheat (Triticum aiestivum L.) variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–143 · show in text ↑

cold · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.