Paper · 2011 · Plant and Cell Physiology

Allocation of Absorbed Light Energy in PSII to Thermal Dissipations in the Presence or Absence of PsbS Subunits of Rice

Satoshi Ishida; Ken-ichi Morita; Masahiro Kishine; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
29
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The thermal dissipation (TD) of absorbed light energy in PSII is considered to be an important photoprotection process in photosynthesis. A major portion of TD has been visualized through the analysis of Chl fluorescence as energy quenching (qE) which depends on the presence of the PsbS subunit. Although the physiological importance of qE-associated TD (qE-TD) has been widely accepted, it is not yet clear how much of the absorbed light energy is dissipated through a qE-associated mechanism. In this study, the fates of absorbed light energy in PSII with regard to different TD processes, including qE-TD, were quantitatively estimated by the typical energy allocation models using transgenic rice in which psbS genes were silenced by RNA interference (RNAi). The silencing of psbS genes resulted in a decrease in the light-inducible portion of TD, whereas the allocation of energy to electron transport did not change over a wide range of light intensities. The allocation models indicate that the energy allocated to qE-TD under saturating light is 30-50%. We also showed that a large portion of absorbed light energy is thermally dissipated in manners that are independent of qE. The nature of such dissipations is discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silencing psbS decreased the light-inducible portion of thermal dissipation in rice.

Treatment
silencing of psbS genese0
Gene
psbSe0
Outcome
light-inducible portion of TDe0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“The silencing of psbS genes resulted in a decrease in the light-inducible portion of TD, whereas the allocation of energy to electron transport did not change over a wide range of light intensities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–962 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silencing psbS did not change energy allocation to electron transport across a wide light-intensity range.

Treatment
silencing of psbS genese0
Gene
psbSe0
Outcome
allocation of energy to electron transporte0
Direction
did not changee0
Qualifier
over a wide range of light intensitiese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“The silencing of psbS genes resulted in a decrease in the light-inducible portion of TD, whereas the allocation of energy to electron transport did not change over a wide range of light intensities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–962 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The model estimated 30-50% of absorbed energy went to qE-TD under saturating light.

Outcome
energy allocated to qE-TDe0
Value
30-50%e0
Qualifier
under saturating lighte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“The allocation models indicate that the energy allocated to qE-TD under saturating light is 30-50%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1062 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A large portion of absorbed light energy was thermally dissipated independently of qE.

Outcome
absorbed light energy is thermally dissipatede0
Qualifier
independent of qEe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“We also showed that a large portion of absorbed light energy is thermally dissipated in manners that are independent of qE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1186 · show in text ↑

loss of function · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 4 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.