Paper · 2002 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Determining critical pre‐ and post‐anthesis periods and physiological processes in Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. exposed to moderately elevated temperatures

Suguru Sato; Mary M. Peet; Judith F. Thomas

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
269
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

To determine the thermosensitive periods and physiological processes in tomato flowers exposed to moderately elevated temperatures, tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill., cv. NC 8288) were grown at 28/22 degrees C or 32/26 degrees C day/night temperature regimes and then transferred to the opposite regime for 0-15 d before or 0-24 h after anthesis. For plants initially grown at 28/22 degrees C, moderate temperature stress before anthesis decreased the percentage of fruit set per plant, but did not clarify the thermosensitive period. The same level of stress did not significantly reduce fruit set when applied immediately after anthesis. For plants initially grown at 32/26 degrees C, fruit set was completely prevented unless a relief period of more than 5 d was provided before anthesis. The same level of stress relief for 3-24 h after anthesis also increased fruit set. Plants were most sensitive to 32/26 degrees C temperatures 7-15 d before anthesis. Microscopic investigation of anthers in plants grown continuously at high temperature indicated disruption of development in the pollen, endothecium, epidermis, and stomium. This disruption was reduced, but still observable in plants relieved from high temperature for 10 d before anthesis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-anthesis moderate heat decreased fruit set per plant.

Taxon
Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.Solanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
moderate temperature stress before anthesise0
Outcome
percentage of fruit set per plante0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate temperature stress before anthesis decreased the percentage of fruit set per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–496 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat immediately after anthesis did not significantly reduce fruit set.

Taxon
Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.Solanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
stresse0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
did not significantly reducee0
Qualifier
immediately after anthesise0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same level of stress did not significantly reduce fruit set when applied immediately after anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–649 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In plants initially grown at 32/26 degrees C, fruit set was prevented without more than five days of pre-anthesis relief.

Taxon
Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.Solanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
32/26 degrees Ce0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
completely preventede0
Qualifier
unless a relief period of more than 5 d was provided before anthesise0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For plants initially grown at 32/26 degrees C, fruit set was completely prevented unless a relief period of more than 5 d was provided before anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat relief for 3-24 hours after anthesis increased fruit set.

Taxon
Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.Solanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
stress relief for 3-24 h after anthesise0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stress relief for 3-24 h after anthesis also increased fruit set”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–885 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants were most sensitive to 32/26 degrees C seven to fifteen days before anthesis.

Taxon
Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.Solanum lycopersicumt0
Outcome
sensitivee0
Direction
most sensitivee0
Qualifier
7-15 d before anthesise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants were most sensitive to 32/26 degrees C temperatures 7-15 d before anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous high temperature disrupted pollen, endothecium, epidermis and stomium development.

Taxon
Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.Solanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
high temperaturee0
Outcome
development in the pollen, endothecium, epidermis, and stomiume0
Direction
disruptione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants grown continuously at high temperature indicated disruption of development in the pollen, endothecium, epidermis, and stomium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1142 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten days of pre-anthesis relief reduced but did not eliminate anther developmental disruption.

Taxon
Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.Solanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
relieved from high temperature for 10 d before anthesise0
Outcome
disruptione0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
still observablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This disruption was reduced, but still observable in plants relieved from high temperature for 10 d before anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1259 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–112 · show in text ↑

heat · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

81 papers: 26 positive, 55 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.