Paper · 2000 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Effects of short episodes of heat stress on flower production and fruit‐set of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

Pagadala V. Vara Prasad; Peter Q. Craufurd; Rodney J. Summerfield; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
171
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) are an important crop of the semi-arid tropics where they are often exposed to maximum temperatures of > 40 degrees C for short periods during the growing season. The objectives of this study were to determine: (i) the effects of short periods of exposure to high temperature on flower production (FN), the proportion of flowers forming fruits (fruit-set) and the number of pegs and pods per plant (RNt); (ii) whether fruit-set is affected by high temperature during different periods of daylight in each diurnal cycle; and (iii) whether responses to temperature were qualitative or quantitative. Plants of cv. ICGV 86015 were grown in controlled environments at a day/night temperature of 28/22 degrees C from sowing until 9 d after flowering (DAF). Then, cohorts of plants were: (a) exposed to day temperature of 28, 34, 42 or 48 degrees C for 2, 4 or 6 d; or were (b) exposed to 34, 42 or 48 degrees C for 6 d either throughout a 12 h day (08.00 to 20.00 h, WD), or only during the first 6 h (AM) or second 6 h (PM) of the day. Values of RNt were significantly reduced by high temperature, by duration of exposure, and by timing of exposure. Variation in FN was quantitatively related to floral bud temperatures during the day over the range 28-43 degrees C. In contrast, only floral bud temperatures > 36 degrees C during AM and WD significantly reduced fruit-set and hence RNt, whereas high PM temperature had no effect on fruit-set. These findings indicate that the response of RNt to day temperature is quantitative and can be modelled by combining the responses of FN and fruit-set to temperature.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature significantly reduced the number of pegs and pods per plant (RNt) of groundnut, depending on duration and timing of exposure.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Material
cv. ICGV 86015e2
Treatment
high temperaturee1
Outcome
RNte1
Direction
significantly reducede1
Qualifier
by duration of exposure, and by timing of exposuree1
Setting
controlled environmentse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Values of RNt were significantly reduced by high temperature, by duration of exposure, and by timing of exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1176 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plants of cv. ICGV 86015 were grown in controlled environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–692 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower production (FN) of groundnut was quantitatively related to floral bud temperatures during the day over 28-43 degrees C.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
floral bud temperatures during the day over the range 28-43 degrees Ce4
Outcome
Variation in FNe4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–110 · show in text ↑
e4

“Variation in FN was quantitatively related to floral bud temperatures during the day over the range 28-43 degrees C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Floral bud temperatures above 36 degrees C during the morning and whole day significantly reduced fruit-set in groundnut.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
floral bud temperatures > 36 degrees C during AM and WDe5
Outcome
fruit-sete5
Direction
significantly reducede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–110 · show in text ↑
e5

“only floral bud temperatures > 36 degrees C during AM and WD significantly reduced fruit-set and hence RNt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High afternoon (PM) temperature had no effect on fruit-set of groundnut.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
high PM temperaturee6
Outcome
fruit-sete6
Direction
no effecte6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–110 · show in text ↑
e6

“whereas high PM temperature had no effect on fruit-set”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1470 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The response of RNt of groundnut to day temperature is quantitative and can be modelled by combining the responses of FN and fruit-set.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Outcome
response of RNt to day temperaturee7
Qualifier
can be modelled by combining the responses of FN and fruit-set to temperaturee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–110 · show in text ↑
e7

“These findings indicate that the response of RNt to day temperature is quantitative and can be modelled by combining the responses of FN and fruit-set to temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1637 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 27 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.