Paper · 1998 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Effect of Insect Damage to Maize Ears, with Special Reference to Mussidia nigrivenella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), on Aspergillus flavus (Deuteromycetes: Monoliales) Infection and Aflatoxin Production in Maize Before Harvest in the Republic of Benin

M. SÉTamou; K. F. Cardwell; F. Schulthess; et al.

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
77
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Maize infection by Aspergillus flavus Link and subsequent aflatoxin contamination as affected by insect damage to maize ears before harvest was studied with surveys in farmers' fields and in a field trial in the Republic of Benin, West Africa. The most important pest species was the lepidopteran earborer Mussidia nigrivenella Ragonot. Percentage of grain infected by A. flavus and of samples contaminated with aflatoxin, as well as the mean aflatoxin content of samples, increased with increasing borer damage. Ears with <2% insect damage had an average of 11.7 and 43.6 ppb of aflatoxin in 1994 and 1995, respectively. Ears in the highest damage class (i.e., > 10%damage) had an average aflatoxin of 514.6 and 388.2 ppb in 1994 and 1995, respectively. In 1994 only, coleopteran species such as Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky and Carpophilus sp. significantly increased levels of aflatoxin in grain samples. In a field trial using M. nigrivenella infestation and A. flavus inoculation treatments, the presence of the insect feeding resulted in increased kernel infection and aflatoxin contamination. Artificial infestation with M. nigrivenella larvae increased aflatoxin content of maize by an average of 45 ppb, whereas inoculation with A. flavus spores increased the toxin level by 517 ppb. The significant interaction between infestation and inoculation indicated that higher levels of aflatoxin BI were found when the fungus was associated with borers than with the fungus alone. M. nigrivenlla was the major field pest connected with A. flavus infection and subsequent aflatoxin production in preharvest maize in Benin.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mussidia nigrivenella was the most important pest species.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Mussidia nigrivenella RagonotMussidia nigrivenellae0pest
Outcome
most important pest speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most important pest species was the lepidopteran earborer Mussidia nigrivenella Ragonot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–336 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Ears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–37 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater borer damage was associated with increased fungal grain infection, contaminated sample percentage and mean aflatoxin content.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
borer damagee0
Interactor
A. flavusAspergillus flavuse0pathogen
Outcome
Percentage of grain infected by A. flavus and of samples contaminated with aflatoxin, as well as the mean aflatoxin content of samplese0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Percentage of grain infected by A. flavus and of samples contaminated with aflatoxin, as well as the mean aflatoxin content of samples, increased with increasing borer damage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–512 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Ears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ears with less than 2% damage averaged 11.7 ppb aflatoxin in 1994.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
aflatoxine0
Value
11.7e0
Qualifier
<2% insect damagee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ears with <2% insect damage had an average of 11.7 and 43.6 ppb of aflatoxin in 1994 and 1995, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–621 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Ears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ears with less than 2% damage averaged 43.6 ppb aflatoxin in 1995.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
aflatoxine0
Value
43.6 ppbe0
Qualifier
1995e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ears with <2% insect damage had an average of 11.7 and 43.6 ppb of aflatoxin in 1994 and 1995, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–621 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Ears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ears with greater than 10% damage averaged 514.6 ppb aflatoxin in 1994.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
aflatoxine0
Value
514.6e0
Qualifier
> 10%damagee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ears in the highest damage class (i.e., > 10%damage) had an average aflatoxin of 514.6 and 388.2 ppb in 1994 and 1995, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–754 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Ears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ears with greater than 10% damage averaged 388.2 ppb aflatoxin in 1995.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
aflatoxine0
Value
388.2 ppbe0
Qualifier
1995e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ears in the highest damage class (i.e., > 10%damage) had an average aflatoxin of 514.6 and 388.2 ppb in 1994 and 1995, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–754 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Ears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–37 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sitophilus zeamais was associated with significantly increased aflatoxin in 1994 only.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Sitophilus zeamais MotschulskySitophilus zeamaise0pest
Outcome
levels of aflatoxin in grain samplese0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
In 1994 onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sitophilus zeamais
Sitophilus zeamais · InteractorThis image was released by the Agricultural Research Service , the research agency of the United States Department of Agriculture , with the ID k3980-17 (next) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1994 only, coleopteran species such as Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky and Carpophilus sp. significantly increased levels of aflatoxin in grain samples.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–909 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Ears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–37 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Carpophilus was associated with significantly increased aflatoxin in 1994 only.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Interactor
Carpophilus sp.Carpophiluse0pest
Outcome
levels of aflatoxin in grain samplese0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
In 1994 onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Carpophilus
Carpophilus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Udo Schmidt from Deutschland · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1994 only, coleopteran species such as Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky and Carpophilus sp. significantly increased levels of aflatoxin in grain samples.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–909 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Ears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insect feeding increased kernel infection and aflatoxin contamination in the field trial.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
insect feedinge0
Interactor
A. flavusAspergillus flavuse0pathogen
Second interactor
M. nigrivenellaMussidia nigrivenellae0pest
Outcome
kernel infection and aflatoxin contaminatione0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
field triale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In a field trial using M. nigrivenella infestation and A. flavus inoculation treatments, the presence of the insect feeding resulted in increased kernel infection and aflatoxin contamination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Ears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Artificial larval infestation increased maize aflatoxin by 45 ppb on average.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Artificial infestation with M. nigrivenella larvaee0
Interactor
M. nigrivenellaMussidia nigrivenellae0pest
Outcome
aflatoxin content of maizee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
45 ppbe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Artificial infestation with M. nigrivenella larvae increased aflatoxin content of maize by an average of 45 ppb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1213 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal spore inoculation increased toxin level by 517 ppb.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
inoculation with A. flavus sporese0
Interactor
A. flavusAspergillus flavuse0pathogen
Outcome
toxin levele0
Direction
increasede0
Value
517 ppbe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with A. flavus spores increased the toxin level by 517 ppb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1293 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Ears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The significant infestation-by-inoculation interaction showed higher aflatoxin BI with fungus and borers than fungus alone.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
infestation and inoculatione0
Interactor
A. flavusAspergillus flavuse1pathogen
Second interactor
M. nigrivenellaMussidia nigrivenellae1pest
Outcome
levels of aflatoxin BIe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
fungus alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The significant interaction between infestation and inoculation indicated that higher levels of aflatoxin BI were found when the fungus was associated with borers than with the fungus alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1485 · show in text ↑
e1

“In a field trial using M. nigrivenella infestation and A. flavus inoculation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–997 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Ears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–37 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. nigrivenlla was the major field pest connected to preharvest fungal infection and aflatoxin production.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Interactor
A. flavusAspergillus flavuse0pathogen
Second interactor
M. nigrivenllae0pest
Outcome
A. flavus infection and subsequent aflatoxin productione0
Setting
Benine0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M. nigrivenlla was the major field pest connected with A. flavus infection and subsequent aflatoxin production in preharvest maize in Benin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1626 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Aspergillus flavus · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

infection · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 11 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

infection · Aspergillus flavus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.