Paper · 2007 · Global Change Biology

Plant nitrogen acquisition and interactions under elevated carbon dioxide: impact of endophytes and mycorrhizae

XIN CHEN; CONG TU; MICHAEL G. BURTON; et al.

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
51
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Both endophytic and mycorrhizal fungi interact with plants to form symbiosis in which the fungal partners rely on, and sometimes compete for, carbon (C) sources from their hosts. Changes in photosynthesis in host plants caused by atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) enrichment may, therefore, influence those mutualistic interactions, potentially modifying plant nutrient acquisition and interactions with other coexisting plant species. However, few studies have so far examined the interactive controls of endophytes and mycorrhizae over plant responses to atmospheric CO 2 enrichment. Using Festuca arundinacea Schreb and Plantago lanceolata L. as model plants, we examined the effects of elevated CO 2 on mycorrhizae and endophyte ( Neotyphodium coenophialum) and plant nitrogen (N) acquisition in two microcosm experiments, and determined whether and how mycorrhizae and endophytes mediate interactions between their host plant species. Endophyte‐free and endophyte‐infected F. arundinacea varieties, P. lanceolata L., and their combination with or without mycorrhizal inocula were grown under ambient (400 μmol mol −1 ) and elevated CO 2 (ambient + 330 μmol mol −1 ). A 15 N isotope tracer was used to quantify the mycorrhiza‐mediated plant acquisition of N from soil. Elevated CO 2 stimulated the growth of P. lanceolata greater than F. arundinacea , increasing the shoot biomass ratio of P. lanceolata to F. arundinacea in all the mixtures. Elevated CO 2 also increased mycorrhizal root colonization of P. lanceolata , but had no impact on that of F. arundinacea . Mycorrhizae increased the shoot biomass ratio of P. lanceolata to F. arundinacea under elevated CO 2 . In the absence of endophytes, both elevated CO 2 and mycorrhizae enhanced 15 N and total N uptake of P. lanceolata but had either no or even negative effects on N acquisition of F. arundinacea , altering N distribution between these two species in the mixture. The presence of endophytes in F. arundinacea , however, reduced the CO 2 effect on N acquisition in P. lanceolata , although it did not affect growth responses of their host plants to elevated CO 2 . These results suggest that mycorrhizal fungi and endophytes might interactively affect the responses of their host plants and their coexisting species to elevated CO 2 .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased the shoot biomass ratio of P. lanceolata to F. arundinacea in all mixtures.

Taxon
Plantago lanceolataPlantago lanceolatae0
Treatment
Elevated CO 2e1
Outcome
shoot biomass ratio of P. lanceolata to F. arundinaceae1
Direction
increasinge1
Qualifier
in all the mixturese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plantago lanceolata
Plantago lanceolata · Taxonsannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using Festuca arundinacea Schreb and Plantago lanceolata L. as model plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–671 · show in text ↑
e1

“Elevated CO 2 stimulated the growth of P. lanceolata greater than F. arundinacea , increasing the shoot biomass ratio of P. lanceolata to F. arundinacea in all the mixtures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1455 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 stimulated the growth of P. lanceolata more than that of F. arundinacea.

Taxon
Plantago lanceolataPlantago lanceolatae0
Treatment
Elevated CO 2e1
Outcome
growth of P. lanceolatae1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
F. arundinaceae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plantago lanceolata
Plantago lanceolata · Taxonsannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using Festuca arundinacea Schreb and Plantago lanceolata L. as model plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–671 · show in text ↑
e1

“Elevated CO 2 stimulated the growth of P. lanceolata greater than F. arundinacea , increasing the shoot biomass ratio of P. lanceolata to F. arundinacea in all the mixtures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1455 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased mycorrhizal root colonization of P. lanceolata.

Taxon
P. lanceolataPlantago lanceolatae2
Treatment
Elevated CO 2e2
Interactor
mycorrhizale2symbiont
Outcome
mycorrhizal root colonizatione2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plantago lanceolata
Plantago lanceolata · Taxonsannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Elevated CO 2 also increased mycorrhizal root colonization of P. lanceolata , but had no impact on that of F. arundinacea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1578 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 had no effect on mycorrhizal root colonization of F. arundinacea.

Taxon
F. arundinaceaLolium arundinaceume2
Treatment
Elevated CO 2e2
Interactor
mycorrhizale2symbiont
Outcome
mycorrhizal root colonizatione2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Elevated CO 2 also increased mycorrhizal root colonization of P. lanceolata , but had no impact on that of F. arundinacea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1578 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizae increased the shoot biomass ratio of P. lanceolata to F. arundinacea under elevated CO2.

Taxon
P. lanceolataPlantago lanceolatae5
Treatment
Mycorrhizaee5
Interactor
Mycorrhizaee5symbiont
Outcome
shoot biomass ratio of P. lanceolata to F. arundinaceae5
Direction
increasede5
Qualifier
under elevated CO 2e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plantago lanceolata
Plantago lanceolata · Taxonsannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using Festuca arundinacea Schreb and Plantago lanceolata L. as model plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–671 · show in text ↑
e5

“Mycorrhizae increased the shoot biomass ratio of P. lanceolata to F. arundinacea under elevated CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1681 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 enhanced 15N and total N uptake of P. lanceolata in the absence of endophytes.

Taxon
P. lanceolataPlantago lanceolatae3
Treatment
elevated CO 2e3
Outcome
15 N and total N uptakee3
Direction
enhancede3
Qualifier
In the absence of endophytese3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plantago lanceolata
Plantago lanceolata · Taxonsannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using Festuca arundinacea Schreb and Plantago lanceolata L. as model plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–671 · show in text ↑
e3

“In the absence of endophytes, both elevated CO 2 and mycorrhizae enhanced 15 N and total N uptake of P. lanceolata but had either no or even negative effects on N acquisition of F. arundinacea , altering N distribution between these two species in the mixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1684–1943 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizae enhanced 15N and total N uptake of P. lanceolata in the absence of endophytes.

Taxon
P. lanceolataPlantago lanceolatae3
Treatment
mycorrhizaee3
Interactor
mycorrhizaee3symbiont
Outcome
15 N and total N uptakee3
Direction
enhancede3
Qualifier
In the absence of endophytese3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plantago lanceolata
Plantago lanceolata · Taxonsannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using Festuca arundinacea Schreb and Plantago lanceolata L. as model plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–671 · show in text ↑
e3

“In the absence of endophytes, both elevated CO 2 and mycorrhizae enhanced 15 N and total N uptake of P. lanceolata but had either no or even negative effects on N acquisition of F. arundinacea , altering N distribution between these two species in the mixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1684–1943 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 had no or negative effects on N acquisition of F. arundinacea.

Taxon
F. arundinaceaLolium arundinaceume3
Treatment
elevated CO 2e3
Outcome
N acquisitione3
Direction
negativee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using Festuca arundinacea Schreb and Plantago lanceolata L. as model plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–671 · show in text ↑
e3

“In the absence of endophytes, both elevated CO 2 and mycorrhizae enhanced 15 N and total N uptake of P. lanceolata but had either no or even negative effects on N acquisition of F. arundinacea , altering N distribution between these two species in the mixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1684–1943 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizae had no or negative effects on N acquisition of F. arundinacea.

Taxon
F. arundinaceaLolium arundinaceume3
Treatment
mycorrhizaee3
Interactor
mycorrhizaee3symbiont
Outcome
N acquisitione3
Direction
negativee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using Festuca arundinacea Schreb and Plantago lanceolata L. as model plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–671 · show in text ↑
e3

“In the absence of endophytes, both elevated CO 2 and mycorrhizae enhanced 15 N and total N uptake of P. lanceolata but had either no or even negative effects on N acquisition of F. arundinacea , altering N distribution between these two species in the mixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1684–1943 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The presence of endophytes in F. arundinacea reduced the CO2 effect on N acquisition in P. lanceolata.

Taxon
P. lanceolataPlantago lanceolatae4
Treatment
endophytese4
Interactor
endophytese4symbiont
Outcome
CO 2 effect on N acquisitione4
Direction
reducede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plantago lanceolata
Plantago lanceolata · Taxonsannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using Festuca arundinacea Schreb and Plantago lanceolata L. as model plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–671 · show in text ↑
e4

“The presence of endophytes in F. arundinacea , however, reduced the CO 2 effect on N acquisition in P. lanceolata , although it did not affect growth responses of their host plants to elevated CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1945–2142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endophytes in F. arundinacea did not affect growth responses of their host plants to elevated CO2.

Taxon
F. arundinaceaLolium arundinaceume4
Treatment
endophytese4
Interactor
endophytese4symbiont
Outcome
growth responses of their host plants to elevated CO 2e4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using Festuca arundinacea Schreb and Plantago lanceolata L. as model plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–671 · show in text ↑
e4

“The presence of endophytes in F. arundinacea , however, reduced the CO 2 effect on N acquisition in P. lanceolata , although it did not affect growth responses of their host plants to elevated CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1945–2142 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

co2 · nutrient: content · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.