Paper · 2023 · Functional Ecology

Elevated atmospheric CO2 suppresses silicon accumulation and exacerbates endophyte reductions in plant phosphorus

Scott N. Johnson; Craig V. M. Barton; Fikadu N. Biru; et al.

12
claims
18
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Many temperate grasses are both hyper‐accumulators of silicon (Si) and hosts of Epichloë fungal endophytes, functional traits which may alleviate environmental stresses such as herbivore attack. Si accumulation and endophyte infection may operate synergistically, but this has not been tested in a field setting, nor in the context of changing environmental conditions. Predicted increases in atmospheric CO 2 concentrations can affect both Si accumulation and endophyte function, but these have not been studied in combination. We investigated how elevated atmospheric CO 2 (eCO 2 ), Si supplementation, endophyte‐presence and insect herbivory impacted plant growth, stoichiometry (C, N, P and Si), leaf gas exchange (rates of photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, transpiration rates) and endophyte production of anti‐herbivore defences (alkaloids) of an important pasture grass (tall fescue; Lolium arundinaceum ) in the field. eCO 2 and Si supplementation increased shoot biomass (+52% and +31%, respectively), whereas herbivory reduced shoot biomass by at least 35% and induced Si accumulation by 24%. Shoot Si concentrations, in contrast, decreased by 17%–21% under eCO 2 . Si supplementation and herbivory reduced shoot C concentrations. eCO 2 reduced shoot N concentrations which led to increased shoot C:N ratios. Overall, shoot P concentrations were 26% lower in endophytic plants compared to non‐endophytic plants, potentially due to decreased mass flow (i.e. observed reductions in stomatal conductance and transpiration). Alkaloid production was not discernibly affected by any experimental treatment. The negative impacts of endophytes on P uptake were particularly strong under eCO 2 . We show that eCO 2 and insect herbivory reduce and promote Si accumulation, respectively, incorporating some field conditions for the first time. This indicates that these drivers operate in a more realistic ecological context than previously demonstrated. Reduced uptake of P in endophytic plants may adversely affect plant productivity in the future, particularly if increased demand for P due to improved plant growth under eCO 2 cannot be met. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased shoot biomass by 52%.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume1
Treatment
eCO 2e0
Outcome
shoot biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
+52%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“eCO 2 and Si supplementation increased shoot biomass (+52% and +31%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1022 · show in text ↑
e1

“tall fescue; Lolium arundinaceum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–923 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon supplementation increased shoot biomass by 31%.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume1
Treatment
Si supplementatione0
Outcome
shoot biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
+31%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“eCO 2 and Si supplementation increased shoot biomass (+52% and +31%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1022 · show in text ↑
e1

“tall fescue; Lolium arundinaceum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–923 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbivory reduced shoot biomass by at least 35%.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume1
Treatment
herbivorye0
Outcome
shoot biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
at least 35%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“herbivory reduced shoot biomass by at least 35% and induced Si accumulation by 24%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1114 · show in text ↑
e1

“tall fescue; Lolium arundinaceum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–923 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbivory induced silicon accumulation by 24%.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume1
Treatment
herbivorye0
Outcome
Si accumulatione0
Direction
inducede0
Value
24%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“herbivory reduced shoot biomass by at least 35% and induced Si accumulation by 24%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1114 · show in text ↑
e1

“tall fescue; Lolium arundinaceum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–923 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 decreased shoot silicon concentrations by 17%–21%.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume1
Treatment
eCO 2e0
Outcome
Shoot Si concentrationse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
17%–21%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot Si concentrations, in contrast, decreased by 17%–21% under eCO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1186 · show in text ↑
e1

“tall fescue; Lolium arundinaceum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–923 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon supplementation reduced shoot carbon concentrations.

Treatment
Si supplementatione0
Outcome
shoot C concentrationse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Si supplementation and herbivory reduced shoot C concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1252 · show in text ↑
t0

“plant phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbivory reduced shoot carbon concentrations.

Treatment
herbivorye0
Outcome
shoot C concentrationse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Si supplementation and herbivory reduced shoot C concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 reduced shoot nitrogen concentrations.

Treatment
eCO 2e0
Outcome
shoot N concentrationse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“eCO 2 reduced shoot N concentrations which led to increased shoot C:N ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1330 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased shoot carbon to nitrogen ratios.

Treatment
eCO 2e0
Outcome
shoot C:N ratiose0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“eCO 2 reduced shoot N concentrations which led to increased shoot C:N ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1330 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endophytic plants had 26% lower shoot phosphorus than non-endophytic plants.

Treatment
endophytic plantse0
Outcome
shoot P concentrationse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
26%e0
Comparator
non‐endophytic plantse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“shoot P concentrations were 26% lower in endophytic plants compared to non‐endophytic plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1433 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alkaloid production was not discernibly affected by treatments.

Outcome
Alkaloid productione0
Direction
not discernibly affectede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Alkaloid production was not discernibly affected by any experimental treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1622 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endophyte-associated reductions in phosphorus uptake were particularly strong under elevated CO2.

Outcome
P uptakee0
Direction
negative impactse0
Qualifier
particularly strong under eCO 2e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The negative impacts of endophytes on P uptake were particularly strong under eCO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1624–1707 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · growth · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

co2 · growth · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Results differ

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

grazing · nutrient: content · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

grazing · growth · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

co2 · nutrient: content · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.