Paper · 2005 · Journal of Bacteriology

The hrpK Operon of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 Encodes Two Proteins Secreted by the Type III (Hrp) Protein Secretion System: HopB1 and HrpK, a Putative Type III Translocator

Tanja Petnicki-Ocwieja; Karin van Dijk; James R. Alfano

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
76
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Pseudomonas syringae is a gram-negative bacterial plant pathogen that is dependent on a type III protein secretion system (TTSS) and the effector proteins it translocates into plant cells for pathogenicity. The P. syringae TTSS is encoded by hrp-hrc genes that reside in a central region of a pathogenicity island (Pai). Flanking one side of this Pai is the exchangeable effector locus (EEL). We characterized the transcriptional expression of the open reading frames (ORFs) within the EEL of P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000. One of these ORFs, PSPTO1406 (hopB1) is expressed in the same transcriptional unit as hrpK. Both HopB1 and HrpK were secreted in culture and translocated into plant cells via the TTSS. However, the translocation of HrpK required its C-terminal half. HrpK shares low similarity with a putative translocator, HrpF, from Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. DC3000 mutants lacking HrpK were significantly reduced in disease symptoms and multiplication in planta, whereas DC3000 hopB1 mutants produced phenotypes similar to the wild type. Additionally, hrpK mutants were reduced in their ability to elicit the hypersensitive response (HR), a programmed cell death associated with plant defense. The reduced HR phenotype exhibited by hrpK mutants was complemented by hrpK expressed in bacteria but not by HrpK transgenically expressed in tobacco, suggesting that HrpK does not function inside plant cells. Further experiments identified a C-terminal transmembrane domain within HrpK that is required for HrpK translocation. Taken together, HopB1 is a type III effector and HrpK plays an important role in the TTSS and is a putative type III translocator.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HopB1 and HrpK were secreted in culture and translocated into plant cells.

Taxon
plante0
Interactor
Pseudomonas syringaePseudomonas syringaee1pathogen
Gene
HopB1 and HrpKe0
Outcome
translocated into plant cellse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas syringae
Pseudomonas syringae · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both HopB1 and HrpK were secreted in culture and translocated into plant cells via the TTSS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–707 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pseudomonas syringae is a gram-negative bacterial plant pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HrpK translocation required its C-terminal half.

Taxon
plante1
Gene
HrpKe0
Outcome
translocation of HrpKe0
Qualifier
its C-terminal halfe0

Verbatim

e0

“the translocation of HrpK required its C-terminal half”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–772 · show in text ↑
e1

“translocated into plant cells”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

HrpK-deficient DC3000 mutants produced significantly fewer disease symptoms in plants.

Taxon
plante1
Treatment
DC3000 mutants lacking HrpKe0
Gene
HrpKe0
Outcome
disease symptomse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“DC3000 mutants lacking HrpK were significantly reduced in disease symptoms and multiplication in planta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–985 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

HrpK-deficient DC3000 mutants multiplied significantly less in plants.

Taxon
plante1
Treatment
DC3000 mutants lacking HrpKe0
Gene
HrpKe0
Outcome
multiplication in plantae0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“DC3000 mutants lacking HrpK were significantly reduced in disease symptoms and multiplication in planta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–985 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DC3000 hopB1 mutants had phenotypes similar to wild type.

Taxon
plante1
Treatment
DC3000 hopB1 mutantse0
Gene
hopB1e0
Outcome
phenotypese0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
wild typee0

Verbatim

e0

“DC3000 hopB1 mutants produced phenotypes similar to the wild type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1060 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HrpK mutants had reduced ability to elicit the plant hypersensitive response.

Taxon
plante0
Treatment
hrpK mutantse0
Gene
hrpKe0
Outcome
ability to elicit the hypersensitive responsee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“hrpK mutants were reduced in their ability to elicit the hypersensitive response (HR), a programmed cell death associated with plant defense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial hrpK complemented the reduced HR phenotype.

Treatment
hrpK expressed in bacteriae0
Gene
hrpKe0
Outcome
reduced HR phenotypee0
Direction
complementede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduced HR phenotype exhibited by hrpK mutants was complemented by hrpK expressed in bacteria but not by HrpK transgenically expressed in tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HrpK expressed in tobacco did not complement the reduced HR phenotype.

Treatment
HrpK transgenically expressed in tobaccoe0
Gene
HrpKe0
Outcome
reduced HR phenotypee0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduced HR phenotype exhibited by hrpK mutants was complemented by hrpK expressed in bacteria but not by HrpK transgenically expressed in tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1367 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A C-terminal transmembrane domain was required for HrpK translocation.

Taxon
plante1
Gene
HrpKe0
Outcome
HrpK translocatione0
Qualifier
C-terminal transmembrane domaine0

Verbatim

e0

“a C-terminal transmembrane domain within HrpK that is required for HrpK translocation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1544 · show in text ↑
e1

“inside plant cells”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1426 · show in text ↑

transgenic · disease · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 34 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

inoculation · disease · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

87 papers: 37 positive, 50 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

83 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.