Paper · 2006 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Drought-induced changes in free amino acid and ureide concentrations of nitrogen-fixing chickpea

Dil Thavarajah; Rosalind A Ball

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
11
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The metabolic products of nitrogen (N) fixation in a legume can be amides or ureides. Chickpea (Cicer arientinum L.) is a cool-season legume which transports both ureides and amides from N fixation. Ureides are purine derivatives which are synthesized solely in the nodules. Drought-sensitive legumes accumulate ureides, but the regulation of these N fixation products during drought in chickpea is not yet known. The objectives of this study were (1) to measure the metabolic products of N fixation during drought and (2) to quantify the differences in N fixation among chickpea cultivars during drought by acetylene reduction activity under controlled environment conditions. Five chickpea cultivars were exposed to drought by soil dehydration. Plants were harvested at 1, 5, 10 and 15 d after drought and were analyzed for leaf and stem ureide concentrations and total N. In separate growth chamber experiments, N fixation was quantified daily. Leaf ureide and free amino acid concentrations were analyzed at 1, 5, and 15 d after drought. Drought increased ureide accumulation in drought-sensitive cultivars and decreased total N, alanine and asparagine concentrations over time. Drought-tolerant chickpea cultivars maintained ureide and amide concentrations during drought. Of the chickpea cultivars examined, Myles was the most drought tolerant and CDC Chico was the least. Further research on leaf ureides, alanine and asparagine concentrations would be valuable to determine if these metabolic products could serve as measures for screening chickpea germplasm for drought-tolerant N fixation. Key words: Ureides, N fixation, Asparagine, Acetylene reduction

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased ureide accumulation in drought-sensitive chickpea cultivars.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
drought-sensitive cultivarse1
Treatment
Droughte1
Outcome
ureide accumulatione1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“nitrogen-fixing chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drought increased ureide accumulation in drought-sensitive cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased total N, alanine and asparagine concentrations in chickpea over time.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Droughte1
Outcome
total N, alanine and asparagine concentrationse2
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“nitrogen-fixing chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drought increased ureide accumulation in drought-sensitive cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1110 · show in text ↑
e2

“decreased total N, alanine and asparagine concentrations over time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1181 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought-tolerant chickpea cultivars maintained ureide and amide concentrations during drought.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume3
Material
Drought-tolerant chickpea cultivarse3
Treatment
droughte3
Outcome
ureide and amide concentrationse3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Drought-tolerant chickpea cultivars maintained ureide and amide concentrations during drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1276 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Myles was the most drought tolerant of the chickpea cultivars examined.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume4
Material
Mylese4
Outcome
most drought tolerante4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Of the chickpea cultivars examined, Myles was the most drought tolerant and CDC Chico was the least”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1377 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CDC Chico was the least drought tolerant of the chickpea cultivars examined.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume4
Material
CDC Chicoe4
Outcome
the leaste4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Of the chickpea cultivars examined, Myles was the most drought tolerant and CDC Chico was the least”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1377 · show in text ↑

drought · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

drought · molecular: metabolites · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 3 positive, 8 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.