Abstract
Abstract A greenhouse experiment was conducted to investigate the single and combined effects of different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and bioformulated Paecilomyces lilacinus against M. incognita race 1 on tomato. Dysteric Cambisol soil was used. The experiment took place in Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria. The experiment was laid out as a 3x6 factorial in a completely randomized design (CRD) with three replications. Three applications of the bionematicide were combined with five species of AMF plus an uninoculated control. The results indicated that AMF species differed significantly (p ≤ 0.05) in their efficacy of gall and egg mass inhibition, tomato root colonization rate as well as growth and fresh fruit yield enhancement. Glomus etunicatum and G. deserticola were the most efficient species. Two applications of the bionematicide more significantly (p ≤ 0.05) reduced galling and egg production than a single application. Individual combinations of two AMF (G. etunicatum and G. deserticola) with a double application of the bionematicide, resulted in the greatest gall and egg mass inhibition and consequently the greatest growth and fresh fruit yield enhancement.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
AMF species differed significantly in gall and egg mass inhibition.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume1 - Treatment
- AMF speciese0
- Interactor
- M. incognita race 1
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitae1pathogen - Outcome
- gall and egg mass inhibitione0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“AMF species differed significantly (p ≤ 0.05) in their efficacy of gall and egg mass inhibition”
e1“against M. incognita race 1 on tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
AMF species differed significantly in tomato root colonization.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- AMF speciese0
- Interactor
- AMF speciese0symbiont
- Outcome
- tomato root colonization ratee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“AMF species differed significantly (p ≤ 0.05) in their efficacy of gall and egg mass inhibition, tomato root colonization rate as well as growth and fresh fruit yield enhancement”
Claim · model-written summary
AMF species differed significantly in tomato growth and fresh fruit yield enhancement.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- AMF speciese0
- Interactor
- AMF speciese0symbiont
- Outcome
- growth and fresh fruit yield enhancemente0
- Direction
- enhancemente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“AMF species differed significantly (p ≤ 0.05) in their efficacy of gall and egg mass inhibition, tomato root colonization rate as well as growth and fresh fruit yield enhancement”
Claim · model-written summary
Glomus etunicatum was among the most efficient AMF species.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Treatment
- Glomus etunicatume0
- Interactor
- Glomus etunicatume0symbiont
- Outcome
- most efficient speciese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Glomus etunicatum and G. deserticola were the most efficient species”
e1“against M. incognita race 1 on tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
G. deserticola was among the most efficient AMF species.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Treatment
- G. deserticolae0
- Interactor
- G. deserticolaSeptoglomus deserticolae0symbiont
- Outcome
- most efficient speciese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Glomus etunicatum and G. deserticola were the most efficient species”
e1“against M. incognita race 1 on tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Two bionematicide applications reduced galling and egg production more than one application.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Treatment
- Two applications of the bionematicidee0
- Interactor
- M. incognita race 1Meloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
- Outcome
- galling and egg productione0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- a single applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two applications of the bionematicide more significantly (p ≤ 0.05) reduced galling and egg production than a single application”
e1“against M. incognita race 1 on tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
G. etunicatum with two bionematicide applications gave the greatest gall and egg mass inhibition.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Treatment
- G. etunicatume0
- Interactor
- M. incognita race 1Meloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
- Second interactor
- G. etunicatume0symbiont
- Outcome
- gall and egg mass inhibitione0
- Direction
- greateste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Individual combinations of two AMF (G. etunicatum and G. deserticola) with a double application of the bionematicide, resulted in the greatest gall and egg mass inhibition”
e1“against M. incognita race 1 on tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
G. deserticola with two bionematicide applications gave the greatest gall and egg mass inhibition.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Treatment
- G. deserticolae0
- Interactor
- M. incognita race 1Meloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
- Second interactor
- G. deserticolaSeptoglomus deserticolae0symbiont
- Outcome
- gall and egg mass inhibitione0
- Direction
- greateste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Individual combinations of two AMF (G. etunicatum and G. deserticola) with a double application of the bionematicide, resulted in the greatest gall and egg mass inhibition”
e1“against M. incognita race 1 on tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
G. etunicatum with double bionematicide application gave greatest tomato growth and yield enhancement.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Treatment
- G. etunicatume0
- Interactor
- G. etunicatume0symbiont
- Outcome
- growth and fresh fruit yield enhancemente0
- Direction
- greateste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Individual combinations of two AMF (G. etunicatum and G. deserticola) with a double application of the bionematicide, resulted in the greatest gall and egg mass inhibition and consequently the greatest growth and fresh fruit yield enhancement”
e1“against M. incognita race 1 on tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
G. deserticola with double bionematicide application gave greatest tomato growth and yield enhancement.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Treatment
- G. deserticolae0
- Interactor
- G. deserticolaSeptoglomus deserticolae0symbiont
- Outcome
- growth and fresh fruit yield enhancemente0
- Direction
- greateste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Individual combinations of two AMF (G. etunicatum and G. deserticola) with a double application of the bionematicide, resulted in the greatest gall and egg mass inhibition and consequently the greatest growth and fresh fruit yield enhancement”
e1“against M. incognita race 1 on tomato”
The same questions in other papers
Septoglomus deserticola · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
mycorrhiza · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
61 papers more in this group
See all 65 papers →mycorrhiza · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →mycorrhiza · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
33 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.