Paper · 1975 · Journal of Experimental Botany

The Influence of Brief Exposures to Short Days on the Growth and Development of Barley

J. J. BATCH; D. G. MORGAN

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Plants of barley (Hordeum vulgare L. cultivar Proctor) otherwise grown, in long days (16 h) were given a 2-week exposure to short days from the following stages of main shoot development: (A) double ridge, (B) stamen initial, (C) awn initial, and (D) a later stage of awn differentiation. Treatment B led to severe inhibition and ultimate death of the main shoot ear and treatments C and D to the almost complete failure of certain ears to set grain. In main shoot ears the reduction in floret fertility was shown to be due to male sterility. The effects on shoot mortality and floret fertility are new and have not been observed by other workers when plants were grown in continuous short days. They therefore appear to depend on an exposure to long days before the treatment with short days. In contrast, the effects of the short days on vegetative characters, such as the number, length, and width of leaves on the main shoot and the numbers of tillers produced, were similar to those which have been observed under continuous short days.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 2-week short-day exposure at the stamen initial stage caused severe inhibition and ultimate death of the main shoot ear in barley otherwise grown in long days.

Material
cultivar Proctore1
Organ / stage
main shoot eare2
Treatment
2-week exposure to short dayse1
Outcome
inhibition and ultimate death of the main shoot eare2
Direction
inhibitione2
Qualifier
(B) stamen initiale1
Comparator
otherwise grown, in long days (16 h)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Plants of barley (Hordeum vulgare L. cultivar Proctor) otherwise grown, in long days (16 h) were given a 2-week exposure to short days from the following stages of main shoot development: (A) double ridge, (B) stamen initial, (C) awn initial, and (D) a later stage of awn differentiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–287 · show in text ↑
e2

“Treatment B led to severe inhibition and ultimate death of the main shoot ear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–366 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 2-week short-day exposure at the awn initial and later awn differentiation stages caused almost complete failure of certain barley ears to set grain.

Material
cultivar Proctore1
Organ / stage
certain earse3
Treatment
2-week exposure to short dayse1
Outcome
failure of certain ears to set graine3
Direction
decreaseinferrede3
Qualifier
(C) awn initial, and (D) a later stage of awn differentiatione1
Comparator
otherwise grown, in long days (16 h)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Plants of barley (Hordeum vulgare L. cultivar Proctor) otherwise grown, in long days (16 h) were given a 2-week exposure to short days from the following stages of main shoot development: (A) double ridge, (B) stamen initial, (C) awn initial, and (D) a later stage of awn differentiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–287 · show in text ↑
e3

“treatments C and D to the almost complete failure of certain ears to set grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–449 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In main shoot ears of barley, the reduction in floret fertility was shown to be due to male sterility.

Organ / stage
main shoot earse4
Outcome
reduction in floret fertilitye4
Qualifier
male sterilitye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“In main shoot ears the reduction in floret fertility was shown to be due to male sterility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–541 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth and Development of Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The short-day effects on the number, length and width of leaves on the main shoot were similar to those under continuous short days.

Treatment
short dayse5
Outcome
number, length, and width of leaves on the main shoote5
Direction
similare5
Comparator
continuous short dayse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“the effects of the short days on vegetative characters, such as the number, length, and width of leaves on the main shoot and the numbers of tillers produced, were similar to those which have been observed under continuous short days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth and Development of Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The short-day effect on the numbers of tillers produced was similar to that under continuous short days.

Treatment
short dayse5
Outcome
numbers of tillers producede5
Direction
similare5
Comparator
continuous short dayse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“the effects of the short days on vegetative characters, such as the number, length, and width of leaves on the main shoot and the numbers of tillers produced, were similar to those which have been observed under continuous short days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth and Development of Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–86 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The shoot mortality and floret fertility effects appear to depend on an earlier long-day exposure before the short-day treatment.

Outcome
effects on shoot mortality and floret fertilitye6
Qualifier
an exposure to long days before the treatment with short dayse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The effects on shoot mortality and floret fertility are new and have not been observed by other workers when plants were grown in continuous short days. They therefore appear to depend on an exposure to long days before the treatment with short days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth and Development of Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–86 · show in text ↑

light · disease · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.