Paper · 2012 · Journal of Medicinal Plants Research

Physico-protein based dormancy in medicinal plant of Andrographis paniculata

Daryush Talei

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
11
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Andrographis paniculata is an important medicinal herb in the family of the Acanthaceae. Low seed germination is one of the main problems in A. paniculata. The current study focused on the seed dormancy and effective methods to enhance the seed germination. For this purpose, two experiments were carried out: (1) Testing different mechanical and chemical scarification methods; (2) studying the impact of seed and seed coat proteins on the scarified seeds. The results showed that all scarification methods increased the germination percentage, while seed and seed coat protein extracts decreased it. The fastest and highest germination was obtained using scarification with sandpaper (71.33% at the third day after the scarification). The germination was further increased up to 94% after 20 days. Finally, to identify the role of seed and seed coat proteins on the seed dormancy and germination, the proteins were analyzed on the sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Three polymorphic bands were detected in total. However, the hard seed coat layer may physically affect the seed dormancy, but the presence of a specific protein sized 75 kDa in the seed coat and two proteins sized 31 and 69 kDa in endosperm may cause the physiological dormancy. Our findings suggested that a combination of physical and physiological mechanisms control the dormancy of A. paniculata seed. Key words: Andrographis paniculata, seed protein, scarification, seed dormancy, seed germination.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scarification methods increased germination percentage.

Taxon
Andrographis paniculataAndrographis paniculatat0
Treatment
scarification methodse0
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Andrographis paniculata
Andrographis paniculata · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that all scarification methods increased the germination percentage, while seed and seed coat protein extracts decreased it.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–601 · show in text ↑
t0

“Andrographis paniculata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed and seed coat protein extracts decreased germination percentage.

Taxon
Andrographis paniculataAndrographis paniculatat0
Treatment
seed and seed coat protein extractse0
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Andrographis paniculata
Andrographis paniculata · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that all scarification methods increased the germination percentage, while seed and seed coat protein extracts decreased it.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–601 · show in text ↑
t0

“Andrographis paniculata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sandpaper scarification produced 71.33% germination on day three.

Taxon
Andrographis paniculataAndrographis paniculatat0
Treatment
scarification with sandpapere0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
71.33%e0
Qualifier
at the third day after the scarificatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Andrographis paniculata
Andrographis paniculata · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fastest and highest germination was obtained using scarification with sandpaper (71.33% at the third day after the scarification).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“Andrographis paniculata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination increased to 94% after 20 days.

Taxon
Andrographis paniculataAndrographis paniculatat0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
94%e0
Qualifier
after 20 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Andrographis paniculata
Andrographis paniculata · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The germination was further increased up to 94% after 20 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–799 · show in text ↑
t0

“Andrographis paniculata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three polymorphic protein bands were detected.

Taxon
Andrographis paniculataAndrographis paniculatat0
Outcome
polymorphic bandse0
Value
Threee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Andrographis paniculata
Andrographis paniculata · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three polymorphic bands were detected in total.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“Andrographis paniculata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–76 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest hard seed coat and specific proteins jointly control seed dormancy.

Taxon
Andrographis paniculataAndrographis paniculatat0
Organ / stage
seed coate0
Outcome
seed dormancye0
Qualifier
hard seed coat layere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Andrographis paniculata
Andrographis paniculata · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the hard seed coat layer may physically affect the seed dormancy, but the presence of a specific protein sized 75 kDa in the seed coat and two proteins sized 31 and 69 kDa in endosperm may cause the physiological dormancy.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Andrographis paniculata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–76 · show in text ↑

botanical · growth · Andrographis paniculataPositive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Andrographis paniculataResults agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.