Paper · 2013 · Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences

Field efficacy of neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) based biopesticides for the management of insect-pests of cotton in Northern Ghana.

Jerry Asalma Nboyine; Mumuni Abudulai; Danial Opare-Atakora

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Cotton is an important fiber crop grown in northern Ghana. Its cultivation is beset with numerous insect pest problems. Current pest management practices in cotton fields are based on the use of chlorpyrifos and lamda cyhalothrin based synthetic insecticides which is unaffordable to most peasant cotton farmers. Hence, this study aimed at assessing the field efficacy of neem based biopesticides like neem seed kernel extract (NSKE) and neem seed oil (NSO) as an alternative for the management of insect pests of cotton in northern Ghana. The treatments were 2% NSO, 5% NSO, 5% NSKE, 10% NSKE, chlorpyrifos alternated with lamda cyhalothrin and untreated control. The results showed that 10% NSKE significantly (P<0.05) reduced the abundance of bollworms, aphids and white flies to 0.75, 3.71 and 3.29 respectively while for the untreated control they were as high as 3.07, 14.14 and 6.75 respectively. The neem was non-toxic to the natural enemies. Seed cotton yield were between 52.20% and 90.82% higher in the neem treated plots than the untreated control while yield loss was 64.79% lower on the 10% NSKE treated plots than the untreated control plots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

10% NSKE significantly reduced bollworm abundance to 0.75 compared with the untreated control.

Treatment
10% NSKEe1
Interactor
bollwormsHelicoverpa zeae1pest
Outcome
abundancee1
Direction
reducede1
Value
0.75e1
Comparator
untreated controle1
Setting
northern Ghanae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton is an important fiber crop grown in northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“10% NSKE significantly (P<0.05) reduced the abundance of bollworms, aphids and white flies to 0.75, 3.71 and 3.29 respectively while for the untreated control they were as high as 3.07, 14.14 and 6.75 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–902 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

10% NSKE significantly reduced aphid abundance to 3.71 compared with the untreated control.

Treatment
10% NSKEe1
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae1pest
Outcome
abundancee1
Direction
reducede1
Value
3.71e1
Comparator
untreated controle1
Setting
northern Ghanae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton is an important fiber crop grown in northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“10% NSKE significantly (P<0.05) reduced the abundance of bollworms, aphids and white flies to 0.75, 3.71 and 3.29 respectively while for the untreated control they were as high as 3.07, 14.14 and 6.75 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–902 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

10% NSKE significantly reduced white fly abundance to 3.29 compared with the untreated control.

Treatment
10% NSKEe1
Interactor
white fliesAleyrodoideae1pest
Outcome
abundancee1
Direction
reducede1
Value
3.29e1
Comparator
untreated controle1
Setting
northern Ghanae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton is an important fiber crop grown in northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“10% NSKE significantly (P<0.05) reduced the abundance of bollworms, aphids and white flies to 0.75, 3.71 and 3.29 respectively while for the untreated control they were as high as 3.07, 14.14 and 6.75 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–902 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem was non-toxic to the natural enemies of cotton pests.

Treatment
neeme2
Interactor
natural enemiese2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
non-toxice2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton is an important fiber crop grown in northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–57 · show in text ↑
e2

“The neem was non-toxic to the natural enemies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–949 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed cotton yield was 52.20% to 90.82% higher in neem-treated plots than in the untreated control.

Treatment
neem treated plotse3
Outcome
Seed cotton yielde3
Direction
highere3
Value
52.20% and 90.82%e3
Comparator
untreated controle3
Setting
northern Ghanae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton is an important fiber crop grown in northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–57 · show in text ↑
e3

“Seed cotton yield were between 52.20% and 90.82% higher in the neem treated plots than the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1059 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield loss was 64.79% lower on 10% NSKE-treated plots than on untreated control plots.

Treatment
10% NSKE treated plotse4
Outcome
yield losse4
Direction
lowere4
Value
64.79%e4
Comparator
untreated control plotse4
Setting
northern Ghanae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton is an important fiber crop grown in northern Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–57 · show in text ↑
e4

“yield loss was 64.79% lower on the 10% NSKE treated plots than the untreated control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1156 · show in text ↑

Azadirachta indica · Aphidomorpha · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Azadirachta indica · Aleyrodoidea · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Azadirachta indica · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

botanical · Aphidomorpha · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

botanical · Helicoverpa zea · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

botanical · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 35 positive, 1 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

botanical · Aleyrodoidea · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.