Paper · 2014 · Romanian Agricultural Research

EFFECT OF FOLIAR FERTILIZERS ON PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF POTATO

Tea Horvat; Milan Poljak; Boris Lazarević; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Limited information is available on physiological response of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) to the application of foliar fertilizers. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of three commercial foliar fertilizers (EPSO Microtop, Megagreen and Drin) compared with control (without foliar fertilizer) on the intensity of photosynthesis, concentration of photosynthetic pigments in potato leaves and tuber dry matter yield at various intervals after planting. Greenhouse experiment was conducted during two growing seasons (2006 and 2007), which were characterized by higher than optimum temperatures. Foliar fertilizers were applied five times during vegetation in ten-day intervals starting at tuber initiation phase. Control plants achieved higher intensity of photosynthesis at tuber initiation phase (50 and 55 days after planting) in comparison to all foliar treatments. In all other days after planting, control and foliar treatments had similar intensity of photosynthesis. Application of foliar fertilizers did not increase the concentration of chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b in potato leaves and the aboveground dry matter yield. The highest tuber dry matter yield under conditions of higher than optimum temperature was obtained with the foliar fertilizer Megagreen, which contains calcium.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At tuber initiation, control plants had higher photosynthesis than all foliar fertilizer treatments (50 and 55 days after planting).

Organ / stage
tuber initiation phasee1
Treatment
foliar fertilizerst0
Outcome
intensity of photosynthesise1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
Control plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“EFFECT OF FOLIAR FERTILIZERS ON PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF POTATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“Control plants achieved higher intensity of photosynthesis at tuber initiation phase (50 and 55 days after planting) in comparison to all foliar treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–893 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On other days after planting, control and foliar treatments had similar photosynthesis intensity.

Treatment
foliar treatmentse2
Outcome
intensity of photosynthesise2
Direction
similare2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“EFFECT OF FOLIAR FERTILIZERS ON PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF POTATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“In all other days after planting, control and foliar treatments had similar intensity of photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–998 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilizers did not increase chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b concentration in potato leaves.

Treatment
foliar fertilizerse3
Outcome
concentration of chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b in potato leavese3
Direction
did not increasee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“EFFECT OF FOLIAR FERTILIZERS ON PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF POTATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e3

“Application of foliar fertilizers did not increase the concentration of chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b in potato leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilizers did not increase the aboveground dry matter yield of potato.

Treatment
foliar fertilizerst0
Outcome
aboveground dry matter yielde4
Direction
did not increasee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“EFFECT OF FOLIAR FERTILIZERS ON PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF POTATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e4

“did not increase the concentration of chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b in potato leaves and the aboveground dry matter yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilizer Megagreen gave the highest tuber dry matter yield under higher-than-optimum temperature.

Treatment
foliar fertilizer Megagreene5
Outcome
tuber dry matter yielde5
Direction
higheste5
Setting
conditions of higher than optimum temperaturee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“EFFECT OF FOLIAR FERTILIZERS ON PHYSIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF POTATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest tuber dry matter yield under conditions of higher than optimum temperature was obtained with the foliar fertilizer Megagreen, which contains calcium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1319 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

application · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 18 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

application · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

191 papers: 177 positive, 14 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

187 papers more in this group

See all 191 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

450 papers: 394 positive, 56 negative or no effect

393 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

446 papers more in this group

See all 450 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.