Abstract

Because of difficulties in directly assessing root responses of mature forest trees exposed to atmospheric pollutants, we have used the model TREGRO to analyze the effects of a 3- and a 10-year exposure to ozone (O(3)) on root dynamics of a simulated 160-year-old sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) tree. We used existing phenological, allometric, and growth data to parameterize TREGRO to produce a simulated 160-year-old tree. Simulations were based on literature values for sugar maple fine root production and senescence and the photosynthetic responses of sugar maple seedlings exposed to O(3) in open-top chambers. In the simulated 3-year exposure to O(3), 2 x ambient atmospheric O(3) concentrations reduced net carbon (C) gain of the 160-year-old tree. This reduction occurred in the C storage pools (total nonstructural carbohydrate, TNC), with most of the reduction occurring in coarse (woody) roots. Total fine root production and senescence were unaffected by the simulated 3-year exposure to O(3). However, extending the simulated O(3) exposure period to 10 years depleted the TNC pools of the coarse roots and reduced total fine root production. Similar reductions in TNC pools have been observed in forest-grown sugar maple trees exhibiting symptoms of stress. We conclude that modeling can aid in evaluating the belowground response of mature forest trees to atmospheric pollution stress and could indicate the potential for gradual deterioration of tree health under conditions of long-term stress, a situation similar to that underlying the decline of sugar maple trees.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Three years at twice ambient ozone reduced net carbon gain.

Taxon
sugar mapleAcer saccharumt0
Treatment
2 x ambient atmospheric O(3) concentrationse0
Outcome
net carbon (C) gaine0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
ambient atmospheric O(3) concentrationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acer saccharum
Acer saccharum · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. MPF assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2 x ambient atmospheric O(3) concentrations reduced net carbon (C) gain of the 160-year-old tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone reduced nonstructural carbohydrate storage mainly in coarse roots.

Taxon
sugar mapleAcer saccharumt0
Organ / stage
coarse (woody) rootse0
Treatment
ozonet0
Outcome
C storage pools (total nonstructural carbohydrate, TNC)e0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acer saccharum
Acer saccharum · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. MPF assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This reduction occurred in the C storage pools (total nonstructural carbohydrate, TNC), with most of the reduction occurring in coarse (woody) roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–910 · show in text ↑
t0

“Simulated root dynamics of a 160-year-old sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) tree with and without ozone exposure using the TREGRO model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Three years of simulated ozone exposure left total fine root production and senescence unaffected.

Taxon
sugar mapleAcer saccharumt0
Treatment
simulated 3-year exposure to O(3)e0
Outcome
Total fine root production and senescencee0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acer saccharum
Acer saccharum · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. MPF assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total fine root production and senescence were unaffected by the simulated 3-year exposure to O(3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Ten years of ozone exposure depleted coarse-root TNC pools.

Taxon
sugar mapleAcer saccharumt0
Treatment
simulated O(3) exposure period to 10 yearse0
Outcome
TNC pools of the coarse rootse0
Direction
depletede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acer saccharum
Acer saccharum · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. MPF assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“extending the simulated O(3) exposure period to 10 years depleted the TNC pools of the coarse roots and reduced total fine root production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1159 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Ten years of ozone exposure reduced total fine root production.

Taxon
sugar mapleAcer saccharumt0
Treatment
simulated O(3) exposure period to 10 yearse0
Outcome
total fine root productione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acer saccharum
Acer saccharum · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. MPF assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“extending the simulated O(3) exposure period to 10 years depleted the TNC pools of the coarse roots and reduced total fine root production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1159 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–77 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude modeling can aid evaluation of mature-tree belowground responses to pollution.

Taxon
sugar mapleAcer saccharumt0
Outcome
modeling can aid in evaluating the belowground responsee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acer saccharum
Acer saccharum · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. MPF assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“modeling can aid in evaluating the belowground response of mature forest trees to atmospheric pollution stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1404 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–77 · show in text ↑

ozone · quality: sugar starch · Acer saccharum (sugar maple)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

ozone · molecular: metabolites · Acer saccharum (sugar maple)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

ozone · quality: postharvest · Acer saccharum (sugar maple)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.