Paper · 2002 · Journal of Sustainable Agriculture

Effects of Long-Term Poultry Litter Application to Cotton on Succeeding Corn Crop Production

R. K. Malik; K. C. Reddy

9
claims
12
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Long-term application of organic manures in crop production often leads to environmental problems. After applying poultry litter on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) from 1994 to 1998, a test crop of corn (Zea mays L.) was planted in 1999 to understand the poultry litter's long-term effects on succeeding crop. The experiment was conducted on a Decatur silt loam soil (Clayey, Kaolinitic thermic, Typic paleudult) at Belle Mina, AL. Treatments on cotton included three sources of nitrogen: urea, fresh poultry litter (FPL), and composted poultry litter (CPL); three nitrogen rates: 40, 80, and 120 kg N ha−1; with and without nitrification inhibitor carboxymethyl pyrazole (CMP). The test crop, corn, received no fertilization except for super imposed N treatments in the control plots. The residual effects of 40 kg N ha−1 FPL and CPL increased corn yields by 9% and 24%, respectively, compared to control; similar responses at 120 kg N ha−1 of FPL and CPL were 81% and 202%, respectively. The differences between the previous 80 and 120 kg N ha−1 were also significant. There was no effect of CMP on corn yield and N uptake in 1999 or on cotton in the previous 5 years of application. Rotation of cereal crops like corn, with fibrous root systems, helps to remove any residual nitrogen from long-term poultry litter application to dicots like cotton, thus reducing any environmental concerns.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual 40 kg N ha−1 fresh poultry litter increased corn yield by 9% versus control.

Treatment
40 kg N ha−1 FPLe0
Outcome
corn yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The residual effects of 40 kg N ha−1 FPL and CPL increased corn yields by 9% and 24%, respectively, compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–913 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual 40 kg N ha−1 composted poultry litter increased corn yield by 24% versus control.

Treatment
40 kg N ha−1 FPL and CPLe0
Outcome
corn yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
24%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The residual effects of 40 kg N ha−1 FPL and CPL increased corn yields by 9% and 24%, respectively, compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–913 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual 120 kg N ha−1 FPL increased corn yield by 81%.

Treatment
120 kg N ha−1 of FPLe0
Outcome
responsese0
Value
81%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“similar responses at 120 kg N ha−1 of FPL and CPL were 81% and 202%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual 120 kg N ha−1 CPL increased corn yield by 202%.

Treatment
120 kg N ha−1 of FPL and CPLe0
Outcome
responsese0
Value
202%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“similar responses at 120 kg N ha−1 of FPL and CPL were 81% and 202%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield differed significantly between prior 80 and 120 kg N ha−1 rates.

Treatment
120 kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
differencese0
Comparator
80e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The differences between the previous 80 and 120 kg N ha−1 were also significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CMP had no effect on corn yield.

Treatment
CMPe0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no effect of CMP on corn yield and N uptake in 1999”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CMP had no effect on corn nitrogen uptake.

Treatment
CMPe0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no effect of CMP on corn yield and N uptake in 1999”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CMP had no effect on cotton during the prior five application years.

Treatment
CMPe0
Outcome
cottone0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no effect of CMP on corn yield and N uptake in 1999 or on cotton in the previous 5 years of application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1193 · show in text ↑
Recommendationobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend corn rotation to remove residual nitrogen after poultry litter on cotton.

Treatment
Rotation of cereal crops like corne0
Outcome
remove any residual nitrogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rotation of cereal crops like corn, with fibrous root systems, helps to remove any residual nitrogen from long-term poultry litter application to dicots like cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1358 · show in text ↑

pyrazole · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.