Paper · 2008 · International Journal of Agriculture and Biology

Improving the sustainability of wheat production in irrigated areas of Punjab, Pakistan through conservation tillage technology.

R. A. Mann; Muhammad Ramzan; Anjum Munir

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
20
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Wheat and rice are the major food staples around the globe including Pakistan. The challenge of increasing food production in the next 20 years to match population growth is daunting and warrants improvement in the quality of natural resources for growing more food from marginal and degraded lands. Cost of cultivation must be reduced and at the same time, efficiency of resources like irrigation water, fuel, fertilizers must be improved to make the crop production system more viable and ecofriendly. Resource Conserving Technology (RCT) must figure highly in this equation since it plays a crucial role in achieving the above goals. The RCTs include laser land leveling, zero-tillage, bed furrow irrigation method and crop residue management. These technologies were evaluated in irrigated areas of Punjab province where rice follows wheat. Water use efficiency was increased by 20% in laser leveled fields. Zero-tillage technology resulted in a significant saving of irrigation water (22%), fuel (78%), cultivation (88%) and herbicide use (33%) compared to conventional, thus increasing yields and farmer’s profits. Soil properties and microbial population including bacteria, fungi and actinomyces improved in the zero-till fields. Planting of wheat on raised beds is making headway in low-lying and poorly drained areas. Thus, resource conservation tillage technology provides a tool for making progress towards improving and sustaining wheat production, helping with food security and poverty alleviation in Pakistan in the next few decades. Key Word: Rice; Wheat; Cropping system; Sustainability; Resource conservation

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Laser leveling increased water use efficiency by 20% in wheat fields.

Treatment
laser leveled fieldse1
Outcome
Water use efficiencye1
Direction
increasede1
Value
20%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Improving the sustainability of wheat production in irrigated areas of Punjab, Pakistan through conservation tillage technology.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water use efficiency was increased by 20% in laser leveled fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–910 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero-tillage significantly decreased irrigation water use by 22% compared with conventional tillage.

Treatment
Zero-tillage technologye2
Outcome
irrigation watere2
Direction
decreaseinferrede2
Value
22%e2
Comparator
conventionale2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Improving the sustainability of wheat production in irrigated areas of Punjab, Pakistan through conservation tillage technology.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–128 · show in text ↑
e2

“Zero-tillage technology resulted in a significant saving of irrigation water (22%), fuel (78%), cultivation (88%) and herbicide use (33%) compared to conventional”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1074 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero-tillage significantly decreased fuel use by 78% compared with conventional tillage.

Treatment
Zero-tillage technologye2
Outcome
fuele2
Direction
decreaseinferrede2
Value
78%e2
Comparator
conventionale2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Improving the sustainability of wheat production in irrigated areas of Punjab, Pakistan through conservation tillage technology.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–128 · show in text ↑
e2

“Zero-tillage technology resulted in a significant saving of irrigation water (22%), fuel (78%), cultivation (88%) and herbicide use (33%) compared to conventional”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1074 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero-tillage significantly decreased cultivation by 88% compared with conventional tillage.

Treatment
Zero-tillage technologye2
Outcome
cultivatione2
Direction
decreaseinferrede2
Value
88%e2
Comparator
conventionale2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Improving the sustainability of wheat production in irrigated areas of Punjab, Pakistan through conservation tillage technology.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–128 · show in text ↑
e2

“Zero-tillage technology resulted in a significant saving of irrigation water (22%), fuel (78%), cultivation (88%) and herbicide use (33%) compared to conventional”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1074 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero-tillage significantly decreased herbicide use by 33% compared with conventional tillage.

Treatment
Zero-tillage technologye2
Outcome
herbicide usee2
Direction
decreaseinferrede2
Value
33%e2
Comparator
conventionale2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Improving the sustainability of wheat production in irrigated areas of Punjab, Pakistan through conservation tillage technology.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–128 · show in text ↑
e2

“Zero-tillage technology resulted in a significant saving of irrigation water (22%), fuel (78%), cultivation (88%) and herbicide use (33%) compared to conventional”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1074 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero-tillage increased wheat yields and farmers profits compared with conventional tillage.

Treatment
Zero-tillage technologye2
Outcome
yieldse3
Direction
increasinge3
Comparator
conventionale2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Improving the sustainability of wheat production in irrigated areas of Punjab, Pakistan through conservation tillage technology.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–128 · show in text ↑
e2

“Zero-tillage technology resulted in a significant saving of irrigation water (22%), fuel (78%), cultivation (88%) and herbicide use (33%) compared to conventional”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1074 · show in text ↑
e3

“thus increasing yields and farmer’s profits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil properties and microbial populations improved in zero-till fields.

Treatment
zero-tille4
Outcome
Soil properties and microbial populatione4
Direction
improvede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Improving the sustainability of wheat production in irrigated areas of Punjab, Pakistan through conservation tillage technology.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–128 · show in text ↑
e4

“Soil properties and microbial population including bacteria, fungi and actinomyces improved in the zero-till fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1236 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat planting on raised beds is making headway in low-lying and poorly drained areas.

Outcome
making headwaye5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Improving the sustainability of wheat production in irrigated areas of Punjab, Pakistan through conservation tillage technology.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–128 · show in text ↑
e5

“Planting of wheat on raised beds is making headway in low-lying and poorly drained areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1326 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Resource conservation tillage is a tool for sustaining wheat production in Pakistan.

Outcome
sustaining wheat productione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Improving the sustainability of wheat production in irrigated areas of Punjab, Pakistan through conservation tillage technology.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–128 · show in text ↑
e6

“resource conservation tillage technology provides a tool for making progress towards improving and sustaining wheat production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1460 · show in text ↑

tillage · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

117 papers: 97 positive, 20 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

tillage · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 26 positive, 1 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

tillage · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 48 positive, 9 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.