Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Bed planting increased grain yield by 13% over conventional tillage in 2015-16.

A claim from Straw Mulch and Restricted Irrigation Effect on Productivity, Profitability and Water Use in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Various Crop Establishment Techniques in Eastern Sub-Himalayan Plains of India · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bed planting increased grain yield by 13% over conventional tillage in 2015-16.

Treatment
BPe0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
2015-16e0
Comparator
CTe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was increased by 13 and 16.9% under BP over that under CT during 2015-16 and 2016-17, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–699
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–121

Title

Straw Mulch and Restricted Irrigation Effect on Productivity, Profitability and Water Use in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Various Crop Establishment Techniques in Eastern Sub-Himalayan Plains of India

Prantick Singha; Triptesh Mondal; Koushik Patra; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2018. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2018.702.183

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-f9083519857c13fa1457080860dc5d40867b909a46cb5886521c0d1e5f188b2a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this claim · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

1,405 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.