Paper · 2010 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Cadmium concentration in durum wheat grain (Triticum turgidum) as influenced by nitrogen rate, seeding date and soil type

Patrizia Perilli; Les G Mitchell; Cynthia A Grant; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
57
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cadmium (Cd) is a trace element that has been associated with various human health problems. Cd enters plants, either by direct absorption through leaves or by uptake from soils, allowing Cd into the food chain. Nitrogen (N) fertilizer management is important in optimizing crop yield and protein content of durum wheat, but may influence Cd availability and hence Cd concentration in crops, with the effects being strongly influenced by environmental conditions and crop cultivar. RESULTS: In field studies, Cd and protein concentration in durum wheat grain differed between cultivars and were strongly affected by N application, with only minor effects of N occurring on concentration and uptake of P and Zn. Protein content increased significantly with N application in five of six site-years, with the response being generally independent of cultivar and seeding data. Cd concentration also increased with N application in five of six seeding dates, with the response being greater in AC Melita than Arcola in three of the six site-years. There were large differences in Cd concentration from year to year and with seeding date, indicating a strong environmental influence. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that different cultivars accumulate different levels of Cd in the grain and that seeding date and nitrogen fertilizer management can influence grain Cd concentration, with the magnitude of effects varying with environmental factors. In the future we may be able to manipulate management practices to optimize protein concentration and minimize Cd concentration in durum wheat, which could help to address the health and safety concerns of consumers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Durum wheat grain Cd concentration differed among cultivars.

Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
Cde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cd and protein concentration in durum wheat grain differed between cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–597 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Durum wheat grain protein concentration differed among cultivars.

Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
protein concentratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cd and protein concentration in durum wheat grain differed between cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–597 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application significantly increased grain protein in five of six durum wheat site-years.

Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
Protein contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
five of six site-yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Protein content increased significantly with N application in five of six site-years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–807 · show in text ↑
e1

“durum wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–570 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application increased grain Cd concentration in five of six seeding dates.

Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
Cd concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
five of six seeding datese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cd concentration also increased with N application in five of six seeding dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–964 · show in text ↑
e1

“durum wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–570 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen had only minor effects on P concentration and uptake in durum wheat.

Treatment
Ne0
Outcome
concentration and uptake of Pe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only minor effects of N occurring on concentration and uptake of P and Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–721 · show in text ↑
e1

“durum wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–570 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen had only minor effects on Zn concentration and uptake in durum wheat.

Treatment
Ne0
Outcome
uptake of P and Zne0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only minor effects of N occurring on concentration and uptake of P and Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–721 · show in text ↑
e1

“durum wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–570 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Cd response to nitrogen was greater in AC Melita than Arcola in three of six site-years.

Material
AC Melitae0
Outcome
Cd concentratione1
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
three of the six site-yearse0
Comparator
Arcolae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the response being greater in AC Melita than Arcola in three of the six site-years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1053 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cd concentration also increased with N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–935 · show in text ↑
e2

“durum wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–570 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Durum wheat grain Cd concentration varied greatly among years.

Outcome
Cd concentratione0
Qualifier
year to yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were large differences in Cd concentration from year to year and with seeding date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1143 · show in text ↑
e1

“durum wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–570 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Durum wheat grain Cd concentration varied greatly with seeding date.

Treatment
seeding datee0
Outcome
Cd concentratione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were large differences in Cd concentration from year to year and with seeding date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1143 · show in text ↑
e1

“durum wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–570 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Nitrogen starvation negatively affected total nitrogen content.

    Transcriptomic response of durum wheat to nitrogen starvation · 2017

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 23 positive, 1 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.