Paper · 2004 · Weed Science

Spring wheat seed size and seeding rate effects on yield loss due to wild oat (Avena fatua) interference

Robert N. Stougaard; Qingwu Xue

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
70
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The development of competitive cropping systems could minimize the negative effects of wild oat competition on cereal grain yield, and in the process, help augment herbicide use. A 3-yr field experiment was conducted at Kalispell, MT, to investigate the effects of spring wheat seed size and seeding rate on wheat spike production, biomass, and grain yield under a range of wild oat densities. Wheat plant density, spikes, biomass, and yield all increased as seed size and seeding rates increased. Averaged across all other factors, the use of higher seeding rates and larger seed sizes improved yields by 12 and 18%, respectively. Accordingly, grain yield was more highly correlated with seed size than with seeding rate effects. However, the combined use of both tactics resulted in a more competitive cropping system, improving grain yields by 30%. Seeding rate effects were related to spike production, whereas seed size effects were related to biomass production. As such, plants derived from large seed appear to have greater vigor and are able to acquire a larger share of plant growth factors relative to plants derived from small seed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat density, spikes, biomass and yield increased with seed size and seeding rate.

Material
seed sizee0
Treatment
seeding ratese0
Outcome
plant density, spikes, biomass, and yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat plant density, spikes, biomass, and yield all increased as seed size and seeding rates increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–497 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher seeding rates improved wheat yield by 12%.

Taxon
Spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
higher seeding ratese0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
improvede0
Value
12e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of higher seeding rates and larger seed sizes improved yields by 12 and 18%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–631 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Larger seed sizes improved wheat yield by 18%.

Taxon
Spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
larger seed sizese0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
improvede0
Value
18%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of higher seeding rates and larger seed sizes improved yields by 12 and 18%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–631 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield was more highly correlated with seed size than seeding rate.

Taxon
Spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
seed sizee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
more highly correlatede0
Comparator
seeding ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield was more highly correlated with seed size than with seeding rate effects.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–730 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Using both larger seeds and higher seeding rates improved wheat grain yield by 30%.

Taxon
Spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
seed size and seeding ratet0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
improvinge0
Value
30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combined use of both tactics resulted in a more competitive cropping system, improving grain yields by 30%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–851 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring wheat seed size and seeding rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeding rate effects related to spike production.

Taxon
Spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Seeding ratee0
Outcome
spike productione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seeding rate effects were related to spike production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–905 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed size effects related to biomass production.

Taxon
Spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
seed sizee0
Outcome
biomass productione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed size effects were related to biomass production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants from large seed appear more vigorous and acquire more growth factors than plants from small seed.

Taxon
Spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
large seede0
Outcome
greater vigor and are able to acquire a larger share of plant growth factorse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
small seede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants derived from large seed appear to have greater vigor and are able to acquire a larger share of plant growth factors relative to plants derived from small seed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1144 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑

property · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.